Defect-enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of ZnO Micro/nanostructures
[3] Ravelli, D.; Dondi, D.; Fagnoni, M.; Albini, A. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2009, 38, 1999.
[4] Ye, C.; Bando, Y.; Shen, G.; Golberg, D. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006,
110, 15146.
[5] Meng, M.; Lai, Y. L.; Yu, Y. F. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2010, 100,
491.
ZnO-2 (nine times) is partial damaged to nanoparticles
(Figure 7c), and ZnO-3 (two times) changes from po-
rous nanorods to nanoparticles (Figure 7d), which re-
sults in their poor photostability.
It has been reported that the photocorrosion mainly
occurred at the surface defect sites of ZnO.[16,31] In our
samples, ZnO-1 owns the highest defect concentration,
however, from Figure 6b-6d, we can see the ZnO-1
has the best and ZnO-3 has weakest photostability. The
possible reason is that ZnO-1 is micrometer-sized (the
structural stability) material.[32-34] As we know, the
nanosized ZnO materials have poor structural stability
and are easy to agglomerate in the photocatalytic proc-
ess. So, nanosized ZnO materials have the poor ability
to resist the photocorrosion and their photocatalytic ac-
tivities decay rapidly. However, ZnO-1 micro/nano
structures possess an overall dimension in micrometers
with nanosized units. The assembled nanosized units are
stabilized to ensure a superior structural stability, so the
agglomeration is minimized. However, if the defects are
mainly on the surface of ZnO nanoparticles, it is rather
difficult to explain the high packing of ZnO-1 since the
aggregation of the nanoparticle units with high surface
defect density is rather difficult to form microstructure.
Maybe, there are some other reasons to explain the
photostability of ZnO-1 samples. The photostability of
ZnO micro/nanostructures will be further researched.
[6] Zeng, H. B.; Liu, P. S.; Cai, W. P.; Yang, S. K.; Xu, X. X. J. Phys.
Chem. C 2008, 112, 19620.
[7] Wang, Q.; Geng, B. Y.; Wang, S. Z. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43,
8968.
[8] Xu, Y. G.; Xu, H.; Li, H. M.; Xia, J. X.; Liu, C. T.; Liu, L. J. Alloys
Compd. 2011, 509, 3286.
[9] Zheng, Y. H.; Zheng, L. R.; Zhan, Y. Y.; Lin, X. Y.; Zheng, Q.; Wei,
K. M. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 6980.
[10] Lu, W. W.; Gao, S. Y.; Wang, J. J. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112,
16792.
[11] Lai, Y. L.; Meng, M.; Yu, Y. F. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2010, 100,
491.
[12] Lin, D. D.; Wu, H.; Zhang, R.; Pan, W. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21,
3479.
[13] Georgekutty, R.; Seery, M. K.; Pillai, S. C. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008,
112, 13563.
[14] Zheng, Y. H.; Chen, C. Q.; Zhan, Y. Y.; Lin, X. Y.; Zheng, Q.; Wei,
K. M.; Zhu, J. F. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 10773.
[15] Wang, Y. J.; Shi, R.; Lin, J.; Zhu, Y. F. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4,
2922.
[16] Fu, H. B.; Xu, T. G.; Zhu, S. B.; Zhu, Y. F. Environ. Sci. Technol.
2008, 42, 8064.
[17] Bai, X. J.; Wang, L.; Zong, R. L.; Lv, Y. H.; Sun, Y. Q.; Zhu, Y. F.
Langmuir 2013, 29, 3097.
[18] Beane, G. A.; Morfa, A. J.; Funston, A. M.; Mulvaney, P. J. Phys.
Chem. C 2012, 116, 3305.
[19] Zheng, Y. H.; Chen, C. Q.; Zhan, Y. Y.; Lin, X. Y.; Zheng, Q.; Wei, K.
M.; Zhu, J. F.; Zhu, Y. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 6675.
[20] Wang, J. C.; Liu, P.; Fu, X. Z.; Li, Z. H.; Han, W.; Wang, X. X.
Langmuir 2009, 25, 1218.
[21] Kong, M.; Li, Y. Z.; Chen, X.; Tian, T. T.; Fang, P. F.; Zheng, F.;
Zhao, X. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16414.
[22] Greene, L. E.; Law, M.; Goldberger, F. K.; Johnson, J. C.; Zhang, Y.;
Saykally, R. J.; Yang, P. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3031.
[23] Cross, R. B. M.; De Souza, M. M.; Sankara Narayanan, E. M.;
Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 2188.
[24] Shi, H. Y.; Deng, B.; Zhong, S. L.; Wang, L.; Xu, A. W. J. Mater.
Chem. 2011, 21, 12309.
[25] Vanheusden, K.; Seager, C. H.; Warren, W. L.; Tallant, D. R.; Voigt,
J. A. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1996, 68, 403.
[26] Zhang, S. B.; Wei, S. H.; Zunger, A. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 075205.
[27] Studenikin, S. A.; Golego, N.; Cocivera, M. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 84,
2287.
[28] Özgür, Ü.; Alivov, Y.; Liu, C.; Teke, A.; Reshchikov, M.; Dogan, S.;
Avrutin, V.; Cho, S.; Morkoc, H. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 041301.
[29] Zeng, H. B.; Duan, G. T.; Li, Y.; Yang, S. K.; Xu, X. X.; Cai, W. P.
Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 561.
Conclusions
ZnO micro/nanostructures made of nanopartiles with
controlled size, surface defect type and concentration
are successfully prepared through simple thermal treat-
ment methods. With the solvent changing from water to
ethanol, the size, surface defect type and concentration
of as-prepared ZnO samples are obviously different.
The luminescence and photocatalytic activity of these
ZnO samples are mainly dependent on the type and
concentration of oxygen defects formed in the samples.
The sample with higher surface defects concentration
exhibits better photocatalytic activity toward MB deg-
radation under UV light irradiation. The surface defects
are proposed to be the active sites of ZnO photocatalyst
in our system.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (No. 21101006)
[30] Ollis, D. F. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1985, 19, 480.
[31] Kislov, N.; Lahiri, J.; Verma, H.; Goswami, D. Y.; Stefanakos, E.;
Batzill, M. Langmuir 2009, 25, 3310.
[32] Lu, F.; Cai, W. P.; Zhang, Y. G. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 1047.
[33] Li, J.; Wang, G. Z.; Wang, H. Q.; Tang, C. J.; Wang, Y. Q.; Liang, C.
H.; Cai, W. P.; Zhang, L. D. J. Mater. Chem. 2009, 19, 2253.
[34] Deng, Q.; Duan, X. W.; Dickon, H. L. N.; Tang, H. B.; Yang, Y.;
Kong, M. G.; Wu, Z. K.; Cai, W. P.; Wang, G. Z. ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces 2012, 4, 6030.
References
[1] Hoffmann, M. R.; Martin, S. T.; Choi, W. Y.; Bahnemann, D. W.
Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 69.
[2] Matsuoka, M.; Kitano, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Tsujimaru, K.; Anpo, M.;
Thomas, J. M. Catal. Today 2007, 122, 51.
(Pan, B.; Qin, X.)
Chin. J. Chem. 2013, 31, 1557—1563
© 2013 SIOC, CAS, Shanghai, & WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1563