Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
DOI: 10.1039/C7CC04767C
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
corresponds to the interaction between the transition dipole
moment at the molecule and at the excited electron-hole pair
in silicon. The Förster-like energy transfer between an emitter
dipole and an array of acceptors filling a semi-infinite half
6
7
8
V. M. Agranovich, Y. N. Gartstein and M. Litinskaya, Chem.
Rev., 2011, 111, 5179–214.
A. P. Alivisatos, M. F. Arndt, S. Efrima, D. H. Waldeck and C.
B. Harris, J. Chem. Phys., 1987, 86, 6540.
1
space is predicted to follow the distance dependence
M. T. Nimmo, L. M. Caillard, W. De Benedetti, H. M.
Nguyen, O. Seitz, Y. N. Gartstein, Y. J. Chabal and A. V
Malko, ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 3236–45.
ꢇ
ꢀ
ꢁ
ꢀ
ꢄ
ꢂ
= ꢁ
ꢃ
ꢆ
(Eq.1)
9
1
1
1
1
M. I. Sluch, A. G. Vitukhnosky and M. C. Petty, Phys. Lett. A,
ꢂ
ꢅ
1
995, 200, 61.
L. Danos, R. Greef and T. Markvart, Thin Solid Films, 2008,
16, 7251–7255.
L. Danos and T. Markvart, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2010, 490,
94–199.
where
τ
o
is the fluorescence lifetime in the absence of silicon
is the
0
1
2
3
interface, d is the chromophore-silicon separation and R
o
5
equivalent of the Förster radius between molecules. We
believe that the present work demonstrates for the first time,
the Förster-like energy transfer between a molecule and
semiconductor and allows the determination of the Förster
1
L. Fang, N. Alderman, L. Danos and T. Markvart, Mater.
Res. Innov., 2014, 18, 494–499.
o
radius R = 2.7 nm. Further work is needed to elucidate finer
S. Huber and G. Calzaferri, Chemphyschem, 2004, 5, 239–
details of this interaction such as the role of direct and indirect
2
transitions in the transfer or the importance of screening at
4
2.
1
1
1
4
5
6
J. M. Buriak, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 1271–308.
B. Fabre, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 4808–4849.
6
this small dipole-dipole separation.
In conclusion, we have successfully attached a porphyrin dye
to the silicon (111) surface by a siloxane/alcohol technique, as
confirmed by infrared spectroscopy, XPS and fluorescence
spectroscopy. By using terminal dihydroxyalkanes as the linker
chain we have prepared a number of samples with controlled
separations (ranging from 6 to 18Ắ) between the chromophore
and the silicon surface. The silicon-chromophore separations
determined by ellipsometry agree well with the calculated
valued determined by DFT. The key quantity of interest -
fluorescence quenching - agrees well with the predictions of
the CPS model. In particular, at dipole separation from the
silicon surface below 2 nm, we have identified unequivocally
the dominant role of Förster-like resonance energy transfer,
with a “Förster radius” of 2.7 nm. We believe that direct
sensitisation of indirect bandgap semiconductors such as
silicon has potentially a huge technological significance,
turning, in effect, silicon into a direct-bandgap material.
W. Peng, S. M. Rupich, N. Shafiq, Y. N. Gartstein, A. V.
Malko and Y. J. Chabal, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 12764.
A. B. Sieval, C. L. Huisman, A. Schönecker, F. M.
Schuurmans, A. S. H. van der Heide, A. Goossens, W. C.
Sinke, H. Zuilhof and E. J. R. Sudhölter, J. Phys. Chem. B,
1
7
2
003, 107, 6846–6852.
1
1
8
9
N. Alderman, L. Danos, M. C. Grossel and T. Markvart, RSC
Adv., 2013, 3, 20125.
E. J. Faber, L. C. P. M. de Smet, W. Olthuis, H. Zuilhof, E. J.
R. Sudhölter, P. Bergveld and A. van den Berg,
Chemphyschem, 2005, 6, 2153–66.
2
0
L. Segev, A. Salomon, A. Natan, D. Cahen and L. Kronik,
Phys. Rev. B, 2006, 74, 1–6.
2
2
1
2
F. Wei, Biosens. Bioelectron., 2003, 18, 1157–1163.
W. Cai, J. R. Peck, D. W. van der Weide and R. J. Hamers,
Biosens. Bioelectron., 2004, 19, 1013–9.
2
3
S. Dutta, M. Perring, S. Barrett, M. Mitchell, P. J. A. Kenis
and N. B. Bowden, Langmuir ACS J. surfaces colloids, 2006,
This work was funded by the UK EPSRC SUPERGEN program
“
Photovoltaic materials for the 21st century” (Reference:
2
2, 2146–55.
EP/F029624/1 and EP/F029624/2). Centre for Advanced
Photovoltaics is supported by Czech Ministry of Education,
Youth and Sport. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000464. Liping
Fang thanks for financial support from National Natural
Science Foundation of China (item No. 61604138). We would
like to thank Dr M. Coogan for helpful suggestions on the
manuscript and Dr A. Kerridge for assistance with molecular
modelling.
2
2
2
2
4
5
6
7
L. Fang, K. S. Kiang, N. P. Alderman, L. Danos and T.
Markvart, Opt. Express, 2015, 23, A1528–A1532.
M. Lu, B. Chen, T. He, Y. Li and J. M. Tour, Chem. Mater.,
2
007, 19, 4447–4453.
K. Padmaja, L. Wei, J. S. Lindsey and D. F. Bocian, J. Org.
Chem., 2005, 70, 7972–7978.
X. Zhang, Y. Wen, Y. Li, G. Li, S. Du, H. Guo, L. Yang, L. Jiang,
H. Gao and Y. Song, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 8288–
8
293.
2
8
B. Fabre, D. M. Bassani, C. K. Liang, D. Ray, F. Hui and P.
Hapiot, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 14786–14796.
J. M. Dixon, M. Taniguchi and J. S. Lindsey, Photochem.
Photobiol., 2007, 81, 212–213.
Notes and references
1
D. L. Andrews and A. A. Demidov, Eds., Resonance Energy
Transfer, Joh Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1999.
29
30
2
3
4
D. L. Dexter, J. Lumin., 1979, 18/19, 779.
R. R. Chance, A. Prock and R. Silbey, in Advances in
Chemical Physics, eds. I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice, Wiley,
New York, 1978, p. 1.
T. Markvart, Prog. Quantum Electron., 2000, 24, 107–186.
P. M. Whitmore, A. P. Alivisatos and C. B. Harris, Phys. Rev.
Lett., 1983, 50, 1092.
31
G. I. Lozovaya, Z. Masinovsky and A. A. Sivashi, Orig. Life.
Evol. Biosph., 1990, 20, 321–330.
5
T. Hayashi, T. G. Castner and R. W. Boyd, Chem. Phys. Lett.,
1983, 94, 461.
4
| J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins