W. Pendergast et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 157±160
159
assay buer consisting of (mM): KCl (10.0), NaCl (118),
CaCl2 (2.5), MgCl2 (1.0), HEPES (20), glucose (10) pH
7.4. After a 60 min incubation with Fluo-3, AM at
25 ꢀC, cells were washed free of dye (Columbus Plate
Washer, TECAN U.S., Inc., Research Triangle Park,
NC). Receptor/cell activation was measured by mon-
itoring changes in ¯uorescence intensity (an indicator of
cytosolic calcium mobilization) using the FLIPRTM
(Molecular Devices Corp., Sunnyvale, CA). Data (rela-
tive ¯uorescence units) were modeled using PRISMTM
(San Diego, CA). EC50 values (Table 1) were estimated
from the ®tted curve functions.
also dependent upon phosphate chain length. In the
dinucleotide series, when the phosphate chain was
extended by one, the activity paralleled that of the nat-
ural nucleotide agonist for a given receptor. Thus,
compound 8 mirrored the activity of UDP on P2Y2 and
P2Y6, whereas compound 9 mimicked that of UTP on
P2Y2 and P2Y4. Compounds 10, 11, and 12 showed
some selectivity for P2Y2, with 10 being the most potent
of the three. However, this apparent increase in potency
might be attributable to the small amount of 9 that was
present in 10.
In conclusion, we have described the synthesis and bio-
logical activities of a series of diuridine polyphosphate
compounds. No activity was observed at the P2Y1
receptor with any of the compounds. The P2Y2 and
P2Y4 receptors exhibited a marked preference for 9
whereas the P2Y6 receptor exhibited a marked pref-
erence for 8.
Results and Discussion
While seemingly simple and relatively mild, the phos-
phate coupling reactions depicted in Scheme 1 often
give rise to byproducts that are dicult to remove.
Consequently, we found that multiple chromatographic
puri®cations on either Sephadex DEAE A-25 or PRP-
X100 HPLC were required to obtain compounds with
adequate purity for biological testing.14 In general, the
yields were inversely proportional to phosphate chain
length, in keeping with the larger number of unwanted
side reactions possible between the starting materials,
their degradation products and any excess of coupling
reagents in the more complex reaction mixtures. For
example, the reaction between 2 and 1 or 3 proceeded
with greater than 90% HPLC conversion to 7 or 8, and
gave isolated yields of 63 and 50%, respectively. At the
other extreme, compound 10 was obtained in only 20%
crude chromatographic purity, contaminated with the
closely-eluting byproducts 9, 11, and 12. Following
chromatography on Sephadex DEAE A-25, an 8.5%
yield of 10 was obtained, with a purity of 87%
(remainder 0.7% 9 and 12% 11). Compounds 11 and 12
were isolated from the same reaction by HPLC, with a
®nal purity of 94% (remainder 2.5% 10 and 3.3% 12)
and 91% (remainder 1.4% 10 and 7.2% 11), respec-
tively. Compound 9 was prepared by several routes,
with the method employing DCC giving the greatest
conversion by HPLC (>50%) and highest isolated yield
(32%). Use of CDI to couple 3 gave a somewhat lower
isolated yield (25%), while the coupling of two mol-
ecules of intermediate 2 with inorganic pyrophosphate16
gave a low yield of 9 which was tainted with Up4
following puri®cation on Sephadex. Of the six diuridine
5-polyphosphates tested, only 7, 8, and 9 were obtained
with purity greater than 99%.
Acknowledgements
High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS-FAB) were
obtained at the Mass Spectrometry Laboratory for
Biotechnology (North Carolina State University,
Raleigh). Partial funding for the facility was obtained
from the North Carolina Biotechnology Center and the
National Science Foundation.
References and Notes
1. (a) Schluter, H.; Oers, E.; Bruggemann, G.; Van der Giet,
M.; Tepel, M.; Nordho, E. Nature 1994, 367, 186. (b) Pintor,
J.; Rotlan, P.; Torres, M.; Miras-Portugal, M. T. Anal. Bio-
chem. 1992, 200, 296.
2. Bennett, W. D.; Olivier, K. N.; Hohneker, K. W.; Zeman,
K. L.; Edwards, L. J.; Boucher, R. C.; Knowles, M. R. Am. J.
Resp. Crit. Care Med. 1996, 153, 1796.
3. Knowles, M. R.; Clarke, L. L.; Boucher, R. C. N. Engl. J.
Med. 1991, 325, 533.
4. Drutz, D.; Shaer, C.; LaCroix, K.; Jacobus, K.; Knowles,
M. R.; Bennett, W.; Regnis, J.; Hohneker, K.; Noone, P.;
Davis, W.; Geary, C.; Boucher, R. Drug Develop. Res. 1996,
37, 185.
5. Yerxa, B. R.; Johnson, F. L. Drugs Future 1999, 24, 759.
6. (a) Sillero, M. A.; Villalba, R.; Moreno, A.; Quintanilla,
M.; Lobaton, C. D.; Sillero, A. Eur. J. Biochem. 1977, 76, 331.
(b) Ogilvie, A. In Ap4A and Other Dinucleoside Polypho-
sphates; McLennan, A. G., Ed.; CRC: Boca Raton, 1992;
pp 229±274. (c) Warner, A. H.; Thomas, D. D.; Shridhar, V.;
McCurdy, H. D. Can. J. Chem. 1977, 55, 841. (d) Sillero,
M. A.; Guranowski, A.; Sillero, A. Eur. J. Biochem. 1991, 202,
507. (e) Ralevic, V.; Hoyle, C. H.; Burnstock, G. J. Physiol.
(London) 1995, 483, 703.
None of the compounds tested exhibited activity at the
P2Y1 receptor. The activities at the P2Y2, P2Y4, and
P2Y6 receptors were dependent upon the length of the
phosphate chains. The rank-order of potency at the
P2Y2 and P2Y4 receptors were similar with 9 being the
most potent compound. The potencies of all compounds
in this series were approximately 4-fold lower at the
P2Y4 receptor as compared with the P2Y2 receptor.
Only 8 exhibited signi®cant activity at the P2Y6 recep-
tor. These results are consistent with the activities
observed with UTP and UDP, where the nucleotides'
activities at the P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y6 receptors were
7. Sigma, St. Louis, MO.
8. (a) Coste, H.; Brevet, A.; Plateau, P.; Blanquet, S. J. Biol.
Chem. 1987, 262, 12096. (b) Kim, K. B.; Behrman, E. J.
Nucleosides Nucleotides 1999, 18, 51. (c) Sawai, H.; Shimazu,
M.; Wakai, H.; Wakabayashi, H.; Shinzuka, K. Nucleosides
Nucleotides 1992, 11, 773. (d) Kanavarioti, A.; Lu, J.; Rosen-
bach, M. T.; Hurley, T. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 6065.
(e) Picher, M.; Boucher, R. C. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
2000, 23, 255.