Communication
ChemComm
assembly in Coltet, resulting in a phase transition from Colhex to Prof. Tomonori Hanasaki, Ritsumeikan University, for POM
Coltet. Furthermore, the Coltet phase formed above 58 1C upon measurements and Prof. Hitoshi Tamiaki, Ritsumeikan University,
heating from mixed states, also suggesting that Coltet was more for various measurements.
stable than Colhex
.
XRD of 3d exhibited the formation of Coltet and Colhex
mesophases at 28 and 45 1C, respectively, upon cooling. The
Coltet and Colhex phases, with a = 2.35 and 3.10 nm and c = 0.75
and 0.76 nm, respectively, consisted of monomeric (Z = 1 for
r = 0.8) and dimeric (Z = 2 for r = 1) unit discs, respectively
(Fig. 5b). The c values, which were twice the general p–p
stacking, revealed the stacking of two molecules with opposite
orientations to prevent the overlap of aliphatic chains in
stacking molecules in the unit disc of Colhex. The unit disc con-
sisting of a single molecule in Coltet induced effective inter-
actions in the aliphatic chains rather than in the core units,
providing a small calculated density of o1. In contrast to 3b
and 3d, 3c exhibited complicated XRD patterns due to its more
effective intermolecular interactions than those in 3b and 3d.
The larger number of flexible points (alkoxy oxygens) in 3b–d
may require longer aliphatic chains for effective intermolecular
interactions, those for p-units, polarized NH and CO units and
aliphatic chains, compared to 2b–d.
In summary, benzoyl-substituted bipyrrole derivatives were
found to form dimension-controlled assemblies through inter-
molecular interactions. Tetraalkoxy-substituted 2c and 2d
formed lamellar and tilted Colr structures, whereas hexaalkoxy-
substituted 3b and 3d formed mainly vertically oriented Coltet
and Colhex structures. Multiple interactions were present in the
pyrrole-based molecules, enabling a variety of assembly modes
depending on the numbers and lengths of aliphatic chains.
Interactions between dipoles of constituent p units, which are
not easy to examine in order to discuss in detail, are essential for
the formation of assemblies. Further modifications and mole-
cular design will provide fascinating dimension-controlled
assembled structures.
Notes and references
‡ Crystal data for 2a (from EtOAc/n-heptane): C26H24N2O6, Mw = 460.47,
monoclinic, P21/c (no. 14), a = 15.361(4) Å, b = 4.9550(13) Å, c = 14.843(4) Å,
b = 98.245(7)1, V = 1118.1(5) Å3, T = 93(2) K, Z = 2, DC = 1.368 g cmꢀ3
,
m(Cu-Ka) = 0.809 mmꢀ1, R1 = 0.0329, wR2 = 0.0938, GOF = 1.074
(I 4 2s(I)). CCDC 1474906. Crystal data for 3a (from EtOAc/iPr2O):
%
C28H28N2O8ꢁC4H8O2, Mw = 520.54, triclinic, P1 (no. 2), a = 7.9706(19) Å,
b = 10.519(3) Å, c = 17.440(4) Å, a = 87.803(4), b = 86.847(4), g = 78.375(4)1,
V = 1429.4(6) Å3, T = 90(2) K, Z = 4, DC = 1.312 g cmꢀ3, m(synchrotron
radiation) = 0.120 mmꢀ1, R1 = 0.0551, wR2 = 0.1213, GOF = 1.132
(I 4 2s(I)). CCDC 1474907.
1 (a) Supramolecular Polymers, ed. A. Ciferri, Marcel Dekker, New York,
Basel, 2000; (b) G. A. Ozin and A. C. Arsenault, Nanochemistry:
A Chemical Approach to Nanomaterials, RSC, Cambridge, 2005;
(c) Supramolecular Dye Chemistry, Topics in Current Chemistry, ed.
F. Wu¨rthner, Springer, Berlin, 2005, vol. 258, pp. 1–324.
2 (a) M.-C. Yeh, Y.-L. Su, M.-C. Tzeng, C. W. Ong, T. Kajitani,
H. Enozawa, M. Takata, Y. Koizumi, A. Saeki, S. Seki and
T. Fukushima, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 1031–1034;
(b) A. El-Ghayoury, L. Zorina, S. Simonov, L. Sanguinet and P. Batail,
Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2013, 921–928; (c) J. Wudarczyk, G. Papamokos,
V. Margaritis, D. Schollmeyer, F. Hinkel, M. Baumgarten, G. Floudas
and K. Mu¨llen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 3220–3223.
3 (a) E. J. Foster, C. Lavigueur, Y.-C. Ke and V. E. Williams, J. Mater.
Chem., 2005, 4062–4068; (b) H. Maeda, Y. Kusunose, M. Terasaki,
Y. Ito, C. Fujimoto, R. Fujii and T. Nakanishi, Chem. – Asian J., 2007,
2, 350–357; (c) R. J. M. Courtemanche, T. Pinter and F. Hof, Chem.
Commun., 2011, 47, 12688–12690; (d) S. Ward, O. Calderon,
P. Zhang, M. Sobchuk, S. N. Keller, V. E. Williams and C.-C. Ling,
J. Mater. Chem. C, 2014, 2, 4928–4936.
4 (a) D. T. Gryko, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2002, 1735–1743; (b) S. Fukuzumi,
K. Ohkubo, M. Ishida, C. Preihs, B. Chen, W. T. Borden, D. Kim and
J. L. Sessler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 9780–9783.
5 T. Dohi, M. Ito, N. Yamaoka, K. Morimoto, H. Fujioka and Y. Kita,
Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 10797–10815.
6 K. C. Braaten, D. G. Gordon, M. M. Aphibal and G. R. Geier, III,
Tetrahedron, 2008, 64, 9828–9836.
¨
7 (a) N. Schroder, J. Wencel-Delord and F. Glorius, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2012, 134, 8298–8301; (b) A. S. Kumar, B. Thulasiram, S. B. Laxmi,
V. S. Rawat and B. Sreedhar, Tetrahedron, 2014, 70, 6059–6067.
8 M. J. Frisch, et al., Gaussian 09 (Revision D.01), Gaussian, Inc.,
Wallingford CT, 2009.
9 (a) N. Yasuda, H. Murayama, Y. Fukuyama, J. E. Kim, S. Kimura,
K. Toriumi, Y. Tanaka, Y. Moritomo, Y. Kuroiwa, K. Kato, H. Tanaka
and M. Takata, J. Synchrotron Radiat., 2009, 16, 352–357; (b) N. Yasuda,
Y. Fukuyama, K. Toriumi, S. Kimura and M. Takata, AIP Conf. Proc.,
2010, 1234, 147–150.
10 The conformations in the solid state were quite different from the
syn conformation in perfluorobenzoyl-substituted bipyrrole deriva-
tives: T. Hong, H. Song, X. Li, W. Zhang and Y. Xie, RSC Adv., 2014,
4, 6133–6140.
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (B) (No. 26288042) and on Innovation Areas (‘‘Photo-
synergetics’’ Area 2606, No. 26107007) from the MEXT. We
thank Prof. Atsuhiro Osuka and Mr Takanori Soya, Kyoto
University, for single-crystal X-ray analysis, Prof. Hikaru Takaya,
Kyoto University, and Dr Ryohei Yamakado, Ritsumeikan University,
for synchrotron radiation XRD measurements (BL40XU at
SPring-8: 2015A1388), Dr Noboru Ohta, JASRI/SPring-8, for
synchrotron radiation XRD measurements (BL40B2 at SPring-8),
Chem. Commun.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016