Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
1184 M.C. Rezende et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 57 (2001) 1183–1190
(1.49 g, 0.01 mol) in acetic acid (5 ml) and acetic
anhydride (5 ml) was gently refluxed for 2 h. After
cooling, the precipitated product was filtered and
recrystallized in acetic acid to give 2.1 g (73% yield)
of 1, m.p. 224–226°C. Analysis, C, 63.01, H, 5.75%
C15H17N3O3 requires C, 62.72, H, 5.92%. IR (KBr)
1660, 1610, 1500, 1440, 1410, 1360, 1190, 1160 and
1080 cm−1. NMR (CDCl3) l 3.16 (s, 6 H,
N(CH3)2), 3.40 ( s, 6 H, CON–CH3), 6.70 ( d, 2 H,
J=9 Hz, Ar–H ortho to NMe2), 8.41 ( d, 2 H,
J=9 Hz, Ar–H meta to NMe2), 8.44 ( s, 1 H,
CHꢀC).
Scheme 1.
The comparison of their solvatochromic behav-
ior in 20 different solvents revealed some interesting
differences between these systems, which are dis-
cussed and rationalized in the present communica-
tion with the aid of semiempirical calculations.
2.2. 1,3-Dimethyl-5-[4,4%-bis(dimethylamino-
phenyl)methylene]-2,4,6(1H,3H)-pyrimidine-trione
(2)
2. Experimental
N,N%-dimethylbarbituric acid (1.56 g, 0.01 mol)
and 4,4%-bis(N,N-dimethylamino)benzophenone
(1.34 g, 0.005 mol) were gently refluxed in a mixture
of acetic acid (5 ml) and acetic anhydride (5 ml) for
8 h. The solution was rotary evaporated and the
residue redissolved in dichloromethane (70 ml) and
washed several times with a 1 M Na2CO3 solution
and finally with water. The dried ( anhydrous
MgSO4) organic phase was evaporated and the
solid residue purified by flash chromatography
(silica gel G-60, dichloroethane as eluent)
to give 0.81 g (40% yield) of the product, recrystal-
lized in acetone-petroleum ether, m.p. 227–230°C
(subl.). Analysis, C, 67.64, H, 6.29%. C23H26N4O3
requires C, 67.98, H, 6.40% IR (KBr) 1700, 1630,
1590,1400, 1360, 1330,1170 and 1080 cm−1. NMR
(CDCl3) l 3.13 (s, 12 H, N(CH3)2), 3.33 (s, 6 H,
CON-CH3), 6.65 (d, 4 H, J=9 Hz, Ar–H ortho to
NMe2), 7.25 (d, 4 H, J=9 Hz, Ar–H meta to
NMe2).
Melting points were recorded on an Electrother-
mal capillary melting point apparatus and were not
corrected. IR spectra were obtained with a Perkin–
Elmer 750B spectrometer, NMR spectra with a
Bruker AMX 300 instrument, utilizing tetramethyl-
silane as internal reference. UV–visible spectra
were recorded on a Hewlett–Packard Kayak XA
diode-array spectrophotometer.
Semiempirical calculations were performed with
the Gaussian 98w package [15]. All structures were
optimized fully with the AM1 hamiltonian, follow-
ing an eigenvector-following routine. In each case,
the first five singlet transition energies were then
calculated by single-point calculations employing
the ZINDO option and configuration interactions
involving monoelectronic transitions from the ten
highest occupied to the ten lowest unoccupied
molecular orbitals.
N,N%-Dimethylbarbituric acid, N,N-dimethyl-
aminobenzaldehyde and 4,4%-bis(N,N-dimethyl-
amino)benzophenone were purchased from
Aldrich. All employed solvents were analytically
pure.
3. Results and discussion
2.1. 1,3-Dimethyl-5-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)-
methylene-2,4,6(1H,3H)-pyrimidinetrione (1)
The umax values of the solvent-dependent absorp-
tion bands of dyes 1 and 2 in various solvents are
listed in Table 1.
A mixture of N,N%-dimethylbarbituric acid (1.56
g, 0.01 mol) and N,N-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde
Inspection of the table reveals some consistent
trends in the absorption spectra of these com-