1680
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 117, No. 4, 22 July 2002
Shin et al.
FIG. 6. ͑a͒ Time constant in the pumping period and ͑b͒ magnitude of
FIG. 5. Absorbances in the PDR1 film with time at various pumping beam
absorbance change vs pumping beam intensity in the PDR1 film.
intensities: ͑a͒ in the pumping period; ͑b͒ in the relaxation period.
0
.088 using the ratio between the absorbances of trans and
cis conformers (Dtrans /Dcis) in the case of the PDR1 solu-
tion.
The same method as in the case of the solution was used
for obtaining the rate constants of the trans–cis isomeriza-
tion with some adjustments for the case of the PDR1 film.
The intensity dependence of the absorbance was similar to
the case of solution ͑Fig. 5͒, but as shown in Fig. 5͑a͒, the
variation of absorbance was slower than that of the PDR1
solution. The magnitude of absorbance change was not satu-
rated even though the pumping beam intensity was as large
Finally, the rate constants of isomerization were deter-
mined by lϭ0.0084Ϯ0.000 06, mϭ0.0336Ϯ0.000 06, and
nЈϭ0.21Ϯ0.004. Comparing these constants with those of
the PDR1 solution, the time constant (nЈ) of the film was
about four times higher than that of the solution, because the
strained cis conformers induced the fast anomalous relax-
ation. Also, both l and m were smaller than those of the
solution, because of very low quantum yields in the film.17
2
as 80 mW/cm . Moreover, there might be another effect be-
sides the thermal isomerization in the relaxation period, since
the curve of D(t) in the relaxation period did not match with
a single exponential growing function but with a bi-
exponential growing function. Paik et al. reported that the
anomalous fast relaxation component was caused by cis con-
V. CONCLUSION
A simple method was suggested for determining the
transition rate constants of trans–cis isomerization quantita-
tively in the pseudo-stilbene-type of azobenzene molecule.
The absorbances of the PDR1 solution and film were mea-
sured with the pumping beam intensity, and analyzed by the
rate equation for the fractions of trans and cis conformers.
As the results in the PDR1 solution, the rate constants l,
m, and n were determined to be 0.032Ϯ0.0001, 0.045
Ϯ0.0001, and 0.053Ϯ0.003, respectively. In the PDR1 film,
the rate constants l, m, and nЈ were 0.0084Ϯ0.000 06,
formers trapped in a strained conformation, and a slow one
was due to the thermal isomerization.16 Therefore, we used a
bi-exponentially growing function to obtain the time con-
stants of the thermal isomerization.
D͑t͒ϭD͑ϱ͒ϩMfastϫ͓1Ϫexp͑Ϫnfast•t͔͒
ϩMslowϫ͓1Ϫexp͑Ϫnslow•t͔͒,
͑11͒
0
.0336Ϯ0.000 06, and 0.21Ϯ0.004, respectively.
where nfast and nslow are the time constants of fast and slow
components of relaxation, and Mfast and Mslow are the mag-
nitudes of fast and slow components, respectively. In order to
consider both the rate constants, a thermal rate constant (nЈ)
of cis→trans isomerization was newly defined by
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by Korea Science and Engi-
neering Foundation ͑96-0300-10-01-3͒.
1
T. Todorov, L. Nikolova, and N. Tomova, Appl. Opt. 23, 4309 ͑1984͒.
K. Anderle, R. Birenheide, M. Eich, and J. H. Wendorff, Makromol.
2
Mfast
Mslow
nЈϭ
ϫnfastϩ
ϫnslow
.
͑12͒
Chem., Rapid Commun. 10, 477 ͑1989͒.
R. C. Ahuja, J. Maack, and H. Tachibana, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 9221 ͑1995͒.
N. B o¨ hm, A. Materny, H. Steins, M. M. M u¨ ller, and G. Schottner, Mac-
MfastϩMslow
MfastϩMslow
3
4
As the fitting result, the value of Mfast/(MfastϩMslow
)
romolecules 31, 4265 ͑1998͒.
Y. Wu, A. Kanazawa, T. Shiono, T. Ikeda, and Q. Zhang, Polymer 40,
5
was 0.58Ϯ0.005. The values of nfast and nslow were 0.333
Ϯ0.003 and 0.033Ϯ0.002, respectively. So, the defined ther-
mal rate constant (nЈ) was determined by 0.21Ϯ0.004.
Figure 6 shows a similar tendency to that of the PDR1
solution in Fig. 4. The time constants ͑k͒ with the pumping
beam intensity are shown in Fig. 6͑a͒, and the plots in Fig.
4787 ͑1999͒.
6
7
8
9
H. Rau, in Photochemistry and Photophysics, edited by J. F. Rabek
͑Chemical Rubber, Boca Rotan, 1990͒, p. 119.
W. J. Joo, C. H. Oh, S. H. Song, P. S. Kim, and Y. K. Han, J. Phys. Chem.
B 105, 8322 ͑2001͒.
L. M. Blinov, M. V. Kozlovsky, M. Ozaki, K. Skarp, and K. Yoshino, J.
Appl. Phys. 84, 3860 ͑1998͒.
D. Andrienko, I. Pinkevich, and V. Reshetnyak, Liq. Cryst. 25, 95 ͑1998͒.
6
͑b͒ are the values of M. DtransϪDcis was determined to be
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
202.28.191.34 On: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:10:09