11 B. Li, B. Mao, T.-M. Liu, J. Xu, A. Dourandin, S. Amin and N. E.
Geacintov, Chem. Res. T oxicol., 1995, 8, 396.
12 N. E. Geacintov, K. Solntsev, L. W. Johnson, J. Chen, A. D.
Kolbanovskiy, T.-M. Liu and V. Ya. ShaÐrovich, J. Phys. Org.
Chem., 1998, 11, 1.
13 E. Meggers, D. Kusch, M. Spichty, U. Wille and B. Giese, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 460.
14 M. Bixon, B. Giese, S. Wessely, T. Langenbacher, M. E. Michel-
Beyerle and J. Jortner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, 96,
11713.
15 B. Giese, S. Wessely, M. Spormann, U. Lindemann, E. Meggers
and M. E. Michel-Beyerle, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 996.
16 N. E. Geacintov, R. Zhao, V. A. Kuzmin, S. K. Kim and L. J.
Pecora, Photochem. Photobiol., 1993, 58, 185.
radical cations (trace B). These e†ects of dAMP on the BPT~`
transient absorption spectra suggest that [BPT~`É É ÉdAMP]
noncovalent complexes are formed in which BPT~` does not
oxidize dAMP.
The BPT~` radical cations in the [BPT~`É É ÉdAMP] com-
plexes can undergo electron transfer reactions with dGMP,
although with a markedly lower rate constants. The value of
k calculated from the slope of a k vs. [dGMP] linear plot for
b
a
these [BPT~`É É ÉdAMP] complexes (as in Fig. 3, data not
shown) is lower by a factor of 5 than k measured in the case
b
of free BPT~` (Table 1).
17 V. Ya. ShaÐrovich, P. P. Levin, V. A. Kuzmin, T. E. Thorgeirs-
son, D. S. Kliger and N. E. Geacintov, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994,
116, 63.
3.4. Deuterium isotope e†ects and the proton-coupled electron
transfer mechanisms
18 V. Ya ShaÐrovich, S. H. Courtney, N. Ya and N. E. Geacintov, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 4920.
In H O solutions, the oxidation of dGMP by BPT~` is more
2
rapid than in D O solutions (Fig. 3), and the values of k in
2
b
19 V. Ya. ShaÐrovich, V. A. Kuzmin and N. E. Geacintov, Chem.
Phys. L ett., 1994, 22, 185.
H O are larger than those in D O solutions by a factor of
2
2
D1.5 (Table 1). This kinetic isotope e†ect suggests that the
electron transfer from dGMP to free BPT~` (or BPT~` in
noncovalent complexes [BPT~`É É ÉdAMP], Table 1) is
coupled to a deprotonation of the primary electron transfer
radical cation product, dGMP~`. This proton-coupled elec-
tron transfer step leads to a lowering of the overall free energy
of reaction, thus favoring electron transfer.41,42 Since this
reaction occurs on time scales of D0.1È10 ls, the Ðnal product
is the neutral radical dGMP(-H)~, which is a product of the
known, rapid deprotonation34,35 of dGMP~`. Hence, the oxi-
dation of dGMP (neutral molecules) by BPT~` with the con-
comitant formation of dGMP(-H)~ (neutral radicals), and BPT
(neutral molecules), can be viewed in terms of electron transfer
from dGMP to BPT~` accompanied by the deprotonation of
dGMP~` (proton transfer from G~` to water), i.e. a proton-
coupled electron transfer reaction.18,43
20 D. OÏConnor, V. Ya. ShaÐrovich and N. E. Geacintov, J. Phys.
Chem., 1994, 98, 9831.
21 T. L. Netzel, K. NaÐsi, J. Headrick and B. E. Eaton, J. Phys.
Chem., 1995, 99, 17948.
22 T. L. Netzel, M. Zhao, K. NaÐsi, J. Headrick, M. S. Sigman and
B. E. Eaton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 9119.
23 E. Zahavy and M. A. Fox, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1999, 103, 9321.
24 A. Harriman, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 945.
25 C. M. Seidel, A. Schulz and M. H. M. Sauer, J. Phys. Chem.,
1996, 100, 5541.
26 K. Fukui and K. Tanaka, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 158.
27 F. D. Lewis, T. Wu, Y. Zhang, R. L. Letsinger, S. R. GreenÐeld
and M. R. Wasielewski, Science, 1997, 277, 673.
28 F. D. Lewis, X. Liu, Y. Wu, S. E. Miller, M. R. Wasielewski, R. L.
Letsinger, R. Sanishvili, A. Joachimiak, V. Tereshko and M. Egli,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 9905.
29 V. ShaÐrovich, A. Dourandin, W. Huang, N. P. Luneva and N. E.
Geacintov, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1999, 103, 10924.
30 Unpublished measurements in this laboratory.
31 N. E. Geacintov, D. Zinger, V. Ibanez, R. Santella, D. Grunber-
ger and R. G. Harvey, Carcinogenesis, 1987, 8, 925.
32 E. J. Hart and J. W. Boag, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1962, 84, 4090.
33 B. H. J. Bielski, Photochem. Photobiol., 1978, 28, 645.
34 L. P. Candeias and S. Steenken, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111,
1094.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Science Founda-
tion, Grant CHE-9700429 and by a grant from the Kresge
Foundation.
35 L. P. Candeias and S. Steenken, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114,
699.
References
36 M. E. Sigman, P. F. Schuler, M. M. Ghosh and T. T. Dabestani,
Environ. Sci. T echnol., 1998, 32, 3980.
1
2
3
4
W. K. Pogozelski and T. D. Tullius, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 1089.
C. J. Burrows and J. G. Muller, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 1109.
B. Armitage, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 1171.
37 S. Fukuzumi, I. Nakanishi and K. Tanaka, J. Phys. Chem. A,
1999, 103, 11212.
38 M. Von Smoluchowski, Z. Phys. Chem., 1917, 92, 129.
39 This constant was estimated from K \ k /k , with pK \ 3.9
L. P. Candeias, P. OÏNeill, G. D. D. Jones and S. Steenken, Int. J.
Radiat. Biol., 1992, 61, 15.
a
`
~
a
for the guanosine radical cation, and k \ 1.8 ] 1010 M~1 s~1
5
6
7
8
9
T. Melvin, S. Botchway, A. W. Parker and P. OÏNeill, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 653.
D. B. Hall, R. E. Holmlin and J. K. Barton, Nature, 1996, 382,
731.
`
for the reaction of the 1-methylguanosine neutral radical with
protons.34
40 S. Steenken and S. V. Jovanovic, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119,
617.
S. R. Rajski, S. Kumar, R. J. Roberts and J. K. Barton, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 5615.
41 D. Rehm and A. Weller, Isr. J. Chem., 1970, 8, 259.
42 S. J. Atherton and A. Harriman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115,
B. Armitage, C. Yu, C. Devados and G. B. Schuster, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1994, 116, 9847.
1816.
43 R. I. Cukier and D. G. Nocera, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 1998, 49,
P. T. Henderson, D. Jones, G. Hampikian, Y. Kan and G. B.
Schuster, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1999, 96, 8353.
337.
10 D. Ly, L. Sanii and G. B. Schuster, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121,
9400.
Paper b000212g
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2000, 2, 1531È1535
1535