ChemComm
Communication
A similar behaviour was observed with a bulky secondary base the complex unstable in an aqueous medium. The vinyl groups in the
(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl piperidine) or a less basic alcohol (PhCH2OH). It complex offer opportunities to heterogenize the complex by hydro-
is likely that steric hindrance of 3 contributed to the weak binding of silylation, which will be a topic for future studies.
these ligands. The steric barrier however can be overcome when a very
This work was supported by the Department of Energy, Basic
strong base was used. Sterically bulky 1,8-diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7- Energy Sciences, grant no. DE-FG02-01ER15184 and also based
ene (DBU), with a pKb 6 times higher than that of triethylamine,25 on work supported as part of the Institute for Atom-efficient
bound to Sn in a 1 : 1 stoichiometry as indicated by a complete Chemical Transformations (IACT), an Energy Frontier Research
conversion of 3 to a new species with a one equivalent of the base. Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of
Even in the presence of two equivalents of DBU, only one molecule Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. Use of the Advanced
would bind to 3, resulting in a pentacoordinated complex with a 119Sn Photon Source was supported by the U.S. Department of
NMR signal at À596 ppm (Fig. S9c, ESI†). 1H and 13C NMR spectra Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under contract No.
indicated loss of asymmetry (Fig. S9a and b, ESI†), which suggests DE-AC02-06CH11357. MRCAT operations are supported by the
symmetrical square pyramidal configuration of the complex, as Department of Energy and the MRCAT member institutions.
opposed to an alternative trigonal bipyramidal.
X.H. acknowledges China Scholarship Council. This work made
The observed behaviour of bases and benzyl alcohol indicated use of the IMSERC facility at Northwestern University.
that Sn in 3 was a Lewis acid and accessible. In fact, the remark-
able e-withdrawing tendency of the POSS ligands was expected to
Notes and references
1 D. B. Cordes, P. D. Lickiss and F. Rataboul, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110,
make the Sn very electron deficient26 Together with the fact that
syn-binding was possible as indicated by ethylenediamine, it is
2081–2173.
likely that 3 would be a catalyst for bond-forming reactions. To this
end, we tested 3 as a catalyst for epoxide ring opening and hydride
transfer reactions. The ring-opening of styrene oxide with benzyl
alcohol (Scheme 2) was conducted using 0.5 mol% 3. All epoxide
was consumed after 16 h at 80 1C, producing a primary alcohol
product with 50% yield (by 1H NMR). The by-products were:
phenylacetaldehyde (2%), which was formed by isomerization of
styrene oxide, and its reduction product, phenethyl alcohol (10%),
most likely formed by hydride transfer from benzyl alcohol, which
also produced benzaldehyde (6%). At the conclusion of the reac-
tion, addition of another aliquot of reactants resulted in continued
reaction until complete consumption of the epoxide after 16 h,
indicating preservation of catalytic activity.
2 F. J. Feher and T. A. Budzichowski, Polyhedron, 1995, 14, 3239–3253.
3 M. Crocker, R. H. M. Herold and A. G. Orpen, Chem. Commun., 1997,
2411.
4 T. Maschmeyer, M. C. Klunduk, C. M. Martin, D. S. Shephard,
J. M. Thomas and B. F. G. Johnson, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1847–1848.
5 S. Lovat, M. Mba, H. C. L. Abbenhuis, D. Vogt, C. Zonta and
G. Licini, Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 4724–4728.
6 F. J. Feher, T. A. Budzichowski and K. J. Weller, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1989, 111, 7288–7289.
7 Y. K. Gun’ko, R. Reilly, F. T. Edelmann and H.-G. Schmidt, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 1279–1281.
8 E. A. Quadrelli and J.-M. Basset, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2010, 254, 707–728.
9 M. Renz, T. Blasco, A. Corma, V. Fornes, R. Jensen and L. Nemeth,
Chem. – Eur. J., 2002, 8, 4708–4717.
10 M. Boronat, A. Corma and M. Renz, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110,
21168–21174.
11 J. J. Pacheco and M. E. David, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2014, 111,
8363–8367.
12 M. Moliner, Y. Roman-Leshkov and M. E. Davis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U. S. A., 2010, 107, 6164–6168.
3 was also active for hydride transfer reactions, and achieved
nearly complete conversion of p-nitrobenzaldehyde to p-nitrobenzyl
alcohol in 1 h in the presence of a 2-fold excess of benzyl alcohol in 13 R. Bermejo-Deval, R. S. Assary, E. Nikolla, M. Moliner, Y. Roman-
Leshkov, S.-J. Hwang, A. Palsdottir, D. Silverman, R. F. Lobo, L. A.
Curtiss and M. E. Davis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2012, 109, 9727–9732.
14 J. D. Lewis, S. Van de Vyver, A. J. Crisci, W. R. Gunther, V. K.
toluene at 100 1C (a Meerwein–Ponndorf reaction).
In summary, we have succeeded in the first synthesis of a
stannasilsesquioxane with a tetrahedrally coordinated Sn. Sur-
rounded by four siloxy bonds, the Sn center was similar to that in
a Sn-beta zeolite. It acted as a Lewis acid, and coordinated to basic
Michaelis, R. G. Griffin and Y. Roman-Leshkov, ChemSusChem,
2014, 7, 2255–2265.
15 R. Duchateau, T. W. Dijkstra, J. R. Severn, R. A. van Santen and
I. V. Korobkov, Dalton Trans., 2004, 2677–2682.
molecules bearing lone pair electrons. Diethylamine or ethylene- 16 R. Duchateau, H. C. L. Abbenhuis, R. A. van Santen, A. Meetsma,
S. K. H. Thiele and M. F. H. van Tol, Organometallics, 1998, 17, 5663–5673.
17 F. J. Feher, T. A. Budzichowski, R. L. Blanski, K. J. Weller and
diamine adducts were stable octahedral Sn complexes, but bulkier
ligands bound weakly. The stannasilsesquioxane was a Lewis acid
J. W. Ziller, Organometallics, 1991, 10, 2526–2528.
catalyst active for epoxide ring opening and hydride transfer reac- 18 M. Boronat, A. Corma, M. Renz and P. M. Viruela, Chem. – Eur. J.,
2006, 12, 7067–7077.
tions. However, the hydrolytic sensitivity of the Sn–siloxy bonds made
19 F. J. Feher and D. A. Newman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 1931–1936.
20 S. Sakugawa, K. Wada and M. Inoue, J. Catal., 2010, 275, 280–287.
21 A. Corma, L. T. Nemeth, M. Renz and S. Valencia, Nature, 2001, 412,
423–425.
22 S. R. Bare, S. D. Kelly, W. Sinkler, J. J. Low, F. S. Modica, S. Valencia,
A. Corma and L. T. Nemeth, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 12924–12932.
23 F. J. Feher, T. A. Budzichowski and J. W. Ziller, Inorg. Chem., 1992,
31, 5100–5105.
24 R. Huerta-Lavorie, D. Solis-Ibarra, D. V. Baez-Rodriguez, M. Reyes-
Lezama, M. de las Nieves Zavala-Segovia and V. Jancik, Inorg. Chem.,
2013, 52, 6934–6943.
25 I. Kaljurand, A. Kuett, L. Soovaeli, T. Rodima, V. Maeemets, I. Leito
and I. A. Koppel, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 1019–1028.
26 F. J. Feher and T. A. Budzichowski, J. Organomet. Chem., 1989, 379,
Scheme 2 Reactions catalysed by 3.
33–40.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 15699--15701 | 15701