The synthesis starts with 5-fluoro-2-nitrobenzaldehyde 2,
which is prepared via reduction and oxidation of the
corresponding acid (Scheme 1).2,4 5-Fluoro-2-nitrobenzal-
Scheme 2. Retrosynthetic Plan for a Tricyclic Indole
Scheme 1. Intermediates for Bartoli-Based Synthesis of 6a
Fischer indole synthesis with 4-fluorophenylhydrazine and
pyruvic acid followed by decarboxylation,7 and metalation
methods by Schlosser.8 Alkylation of 7 with 2-chloroethy-
lamine to give intermediate 8 has precedence utilizing a
quaternary ammonium salt to promote phase-transfer chem-
istry.9 Next, we speculated that indole 8 with the ethylamine
tether could be taken directly into a Pictet-Spengler cy-
clization to give tricycle 11 based on literature precedent
employing paraformaldehyde and TFA at reflux.10 If the
conversion of 8 to 11 failed, the alternative path of reducing
the 5-member indole ring of 8 to the indoline 9 to induce
aniline-type direction and promote the Pictet-Spengler
cyclization to give tricycle 10 is also precedented.9b,11 Lastly,
the oxidation/dehydrogenation of N-alkylated indolines simi-
lar to 10 to afford indoles can be accomplished by a variety
of methods.12
The N-alkylation of indole 7 with 2-chloroethylamine
hydrochloride 12 performed most reliably in the presence
of excess 85% KOH pellets at about 23 °C (Scheme 3).
Lesser amounts of KOH, or use of the powdered form, often
gave stalled reactions and over alkylation. Research into this
matter led to the conclusion that the desired selective mono-
alkylation was taking place on the surface of the base (85%
KOH pellet) in the omega phase.13 Therefore, the use of
excess 85% KOH pellets ensured that an omega phase was
dehyde 2 is converted to the di-n-butyl acetal 3, which gives
the necessary steric bulk to favor the Bartoli reaction.3c The
Bartoli reaction and subsequent hydrolysis affords 5-fluoro-
7-formylindole 4. The 7-formylindole 4 is elaborated via
reductive amination with ethanolamine, BOC protection, and
activation as a mesylate 5 to promote closure of the
7-membered ring to afford 6a. The intermediate mesylate 5
has stability issues due to intramolecular attack of the BOC
group on the mesylate, which gives appreciable amounts of
oxazolidinone 6b at temperatures above 0 °C.5 In addition,
protection group chemistry is necessary since attempts to
replace the BOC group with the required piperidine urea of
1 failed to give the desired mesylate activation for 7-mem-
bered ring closure.
To avoid the low temperature Bartoli reaction conditions
(e-40 °C) that require a large excess of vinyl Grignard
reagent (4 equiv) and afford modest yields (∼50%), we first
focused on alternative methods for preparing the tricyclic
indole component. Secondary goals were to maximize
efficiency by avoiding protection group chemistry and to
delay construction of the bisarylmaleimide until late in the
synthesis. Bisarylmaleimides are insoluble in most solvents,
making them difficult to manipulate and purify. Therefore,
a strategy involving late construction of the bisarylmaleimide
ring system made sense to increase flexibility of solvent and
reagent choices during the synthesis and enhance the purity
of the final product.
(6) (a) Clark, R. D.; Repke, D. B. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1985, 22, 121.
(b) Madge, D. J.; Hazelwood, R.; Iyer, R.; Jones, H. T.; Salter, M. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 1996, 6, 857.
(7) (a) Bergmann, E. D.; Pelchowicz, Z. J. Chem. Soc. 1959, 1913. (b)
Bratulescu, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 984.
(8) Schlosser, M.; Ginanneschi, A.; Leroux, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006,
13, 2956.
(9) (a) Cuadro, A. M.; Matia, M. P.; Garcia, J. L.; Vaquero, J. J.; Alvarez-
Builla, J. Synth. Commun. 1991, 21, 535. (b) Welmaker, G. S.; Sabalski,
J. N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 4851.
With these goals in mind, Pictet-Spengler methodology
to access the indole 7-position in preparing the benzodiaz-
epine portion of 1 was proposed (Scheme 2). In Scheme 2,
the starting 5-fluoroindole 7 is commercially available and
has been prepared via the Leimgruber-Batcho method,6
(10) Zhang, L.-H.; Meier, W.; Wats, E.; Costello, T. D.; Ma, P.;
Ensinger, C. L.; Rodgers, J. M.; Jacobsen, I. C.; Rajagopalan, P. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 36, 8387.
(11) (a) Archer, S.; Lewis, T. R.; Unser, M. J.; Hoppe, J. O.; Lape, H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1957, 79, 5783
.
(12) (a) Naruto, S.; Yonemitsu, O. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1980, 28, 900.
(b) Gribble, G. W.; Pelcman, B. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 3636. (c) Hara,
T.; Mori, K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003,
44, 6207. (d) Hara, T.; Mori, K.; Mizugaki, T.; Ebitani, K.; Kaneda, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6207. (e) Kamata, K.; Kasai, J.; Yamaguchi,
K.; Mizuno, N. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3577. (f) Lakatosh, S. A.; Luzikov,
Y. N.; Preobrazhenskaya, M. N. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 8241. (g) Haider,
N.; Kaeferboeck, J. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6495.
(3) (a) Bartoli, G.; Palmieri, G.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1989, 30, 2129. (b) Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R.; Bartoli, G.; Palmieri,
G.; Petrini, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1991, 657. (c) Dobson, D. R.;
Gilmore, J.; Long, D. A. Synlett 1992, 79
.
(4) Lautens, M.; Fang, Y.-Q. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 538
.
(5) Curran, T. P.; Pollastri, M. P.; Abelleira, S. M. R. J.; McCollum,
T. A.; Rowe, C. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5409.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 16, 2010
3701