Y.Z. Cui et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 377 (2003) 507–511
511
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Nat-
ural Science Foundation of China (No. 20172034)
and the grant for State Key Program of China.
References
[
[
[
[
1] J. Zyss, Nonlinear Opt. 1 (1991) 3.
2] J. Zyss, I. Ledoux, Chem. Rev. 94 (1994) 77.
3] J. Zyss, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 6583.
4] C. Dhenaut, I. Ledoux, I.D.W. Samuel, J. Zyss,
M. Bourgault, H.L. Bozec, Nature 374 (1995) 339.
5] M. Joffre, D. Yaron, R.J. Silbey, J. Zyss, J. Chem. Phys. 97
[
Fig. 4. The linear absorption spectra of compounds I–III in
chloroform (C ¼ 1:0 ꢀ 10À5 mol l ).
(
1992) 5607.
À1
[
[
6] M. Cho, J. Phys. Chem. A 103 (1999) 4712.
7] M. Cho, S.-Y. An, H. Lee, I. Ledoux, J. Zyss, J. Chem.
Phys. 116 (2002) 9165.
[
[
8] B.R. Cho, S.J. Lee, S.H. Lee, K.H. Son, Y.H. Kim, J.-Y.
Doo, G.J. Lee, T.I. Kang, Y.K. Lee, M. Cho, S.-J. Jeon,
Chem. Mater. 13 (2001) 1438.
The angle h between c-axis (Z-axis) and the
molecular least-square plane plays a crucial role in
optimal molecular packing. For both crystals I
and II, b15 ¼ 0; b24 and b33 can be formulated as
9] J.L. Br ꢁe das, F. Mayers, B.M. Pierce, J. Zyss, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 114 (1992) 4928.
[
[
10] B.R. Cho, M.J. Piao, K.H. Son, S.H. Lee, S.J. Yoon, S.-J.
Jeon, M. Cho, Chem. Eur. J. 8 (2002) 3907.
2
3
b
24 ¼ ꢁ sin h cos hb ;
b
33 ¼ ꢁ cos hb ;
ð3Þ
yyy
yyy
11] B.R. Cho, S.B. Park, S.J. Lee, K.H. Son, S.H. Lee, M.-J.
Lee, J. Yoo, Y.K. Lee, G.J. Lee, T.I. Kang, M. Cho, S.-J.
Jeon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001) 6421.
where the plus and the minus for I and II, re-
spectively. The h value is 73.4° for I and 60.1° for
II, the consequent b coefficients of the two crystals
are shown in Table 1. Obviously, the orientation
[12] R. Wortmann, C. Glania, P. Kr €a mer, R. Matschiner, J.J.
Wolff, S. Kraft, B. Treptow, E. Barbu, D. L €a ngle,
G. G o€ rlitz, Chem. Eur. J. 3 (1997) 1765.
2
3
factors (sin h cos h and cos h in (3)) of crystal II
are much larger than those of crystal I, indicating
that crystal II takes a more efficient packing.
The much enhanced SHG intensity of crystal II
in comparison with that of I can be interpreted not
only from the view of molecular engineering by the
favorable molecular structure of II, but also from
the view of crystal engineering by its favorable
packing style.
[
13] V.R. Thalladi, S. Brasselet, D. Bl €a ser, R. Boese, J. Zyss,
A. Nangia, G.R. Desiraju, Chem. Commun. (1997) 1841.
14] J. Zyss, S. Brasselet, V.R. Thalladi, G.R. Desiraju,
J. Chem. Phys. 109 (1998) 658.
[
[15] S. Lovell, B.J. Marquardt, B. Kahr, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
Trans. 2 (1999) 2241.
[
16] T. Verbiest, K. Clays, C. Samyn, J. Wolff, D. Reinhoudt,
A. Persoons, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 (1994) 9320.
17] J. Zyss, J. Pecaut, J.P. Levy, R. Masse, Acta Cryst. B 49
(1993) 334.
[
The linear absorption spectral data of these
compounds are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 4. The
[18] S. Stadler, F. Feiner, Ch. Br €a uchle, S. Brandl, R. Gomp-
per, Chem. Phys. Lett. 245 (1995) 292.
[
[
19] F.W. Vance, J.T. Hupp, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999) 4047.
20] T. Renouard, H. Le Bozec, I. Ledoux, J. Zyss, Chem.
Commun. (1999) 871.
k
max value shifts to longer wavelength as the donor
strength increases, ranging from 326 nm of I to 358
nm of III. All the three compounds have no ob-
vious absorption at 532 nm and are transparent
enough for the 1064 nm Nd:YAG doubling. The
thermal stabilities of three compounds are sum-
marized in Table 1. All of them show higher
melting points than most reported organic second
order NLO crystals.
[21] K. S ꢁe n ꢁe chal, O. Maury, H.L. Bozec, I. Ledoux, J. Zyss,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 4560.
[
22] H.G. Elias, E. Greth, Die Makromolekulare Chemie 123
(
1969) 203.
[
[
23] S.K. Kurt, T.T. Perry, J. Appl. Phys. 39 (1968) 3798.
24] J. Zyss, D.S. Chemla, in: D.S. Chemla, J. Zyss (Eds.),
Nonlinear Optical Properties of Organic Molecules and
Crystals, vol. 1, Academic, Orlando, 1987, p. 100.