LETTER RESEARCH
1
1
6. Lister, R. et al. Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread
epigenomic differences. Nature 462, 315–322 (2009).
7. Saxonov, S., Berg, P. & Brutlag, D. L. A genome-wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides
in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters. Proc. Natl
Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1412–1417 (2006).
METHODS SUMMARY
GLIB precipitation. V6.5 ES cells were lysed and proteins digested by treatment
withProteinase K at55uC. DNAwaspurifiedbyphenol-chloroformextraction and
thenprecipitatedwith ethanol. RNA wasremovedwith RNase A (Qiagen). Samples
were treated with 20ng BGT per 1 mg DNA at 30uC for 3 h (50mM HEPES pH 8.0,
18. Feng, S. et al. Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and
animals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8689–8694 (2010).
2
2
5mM MgCl , 50mM UDPG for 3 h at 30uC), then oxidized with 23mM sodium
1
9. Creyghton, M. P. et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers
and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA doi:10.1073/
pnas.1016071107 (24 November 2010).
periodate 16 h at 22 uC in 0.1M sodium phosphate pH 7.0. Periodate was quenched
by the addition of 46mM sodium sulphite at room temperature for 10 min, then
exchanged into 13 PBS and incubated with 2 mM Aldehyde Reactive Probe
2
0. Boyer, L. A. et al. Polycomb complexes repressdevelopmental regulatorsinmurine
embryonic stem cells. Nature 441, 349–353 (2006).
(
Invitrogen) for 1 h at 37uC. DNA was sequenced with a HeliScope Single
Molecule Sequencer. See Supplementary Methods for detailed protocol.
21. Guttman, M. et al. Ab initio reconstruction of cell type-specific transcriptomes in
mouse reveals the conserved multi-exonic structure of lincRNAs. Nature
Biotechnol. 28, 503–510 (2010).
CMS precipitation. The generation of the anti-CMS antibody is described else-
5
where . DNA fragments were ligated with methylated adaptors and treated with
2
2. Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and
lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553–560 (2007).
sodium bisulphite (Qiagen). The DNA was then denatured for 10 min at 95 uC
(
0.4 M NaOH, 10 mM EDTA), neutralized by addition of cold 2 M ammonium
23. Ku, M. et al. Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two
classes of bivalent domains. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000242 (2008).
acetate pH 7.0, incubated with anti-CMS antiserum in 13 immunoprecipitation
buffer (10mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0, 140mM NaCl, 0.05% Triton X-100) for
2
4. Meissner, A. et al. Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and
differentiated cells. Nature 454, 766–770 (2008).
2
h at 4 uC, and then precipitated with Protein G beads. Precipitated DNA was
2
5. Zhang, H. et al. TET1 is a DNA-binding protein that modulates DNA methylation
and gene transcription via hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine. Cell Res. 20,
eluted with Proteinase K, purified by phenol-chloroform extraction, and amplified
by 4–6 cycles PCR using Pfu TurboCx hotstart DNA polymerase (Stratagene).
DNA sequencing was carried out using Illumina/Solexa Genome Analyzer II and
HiSeq sequencing systems.
1
390–1393 (2010).
26. Lee, T. I. et al. Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human
embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 301–313 (2006).
2
2
7. Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental
genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315–326 (2006).
8. Fouse, S. D. et al. Promoter CpG methylation contributes to ES cell gene regulation
in parallel with Oct4/Nanog, PcG complex, and histone H3 K4/K27 trimethylation.
Cell Stem Cell 2, 160–169 (2008).
Received 4 December 2010; accepted 11 April 2011.
Published online 8 May 2011.
1
2
3
.
.
.
Tahiliani, M. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in
mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324, 930–935 (2009).
Kriaucionis, S. & Heintz, N. The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is
present in Purkinje neurons and the brain. Science 324, 929–930 (2009).
Szwagierczak, A., Bultmann, S., Schmidt, C. S., Spada, F. & Leonhardt, H. Sensitive
enzymatic quantification of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in genomic DNA. Nucleic
Acids Res. 38, e181 (2010).
Ito, S. et al. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal
and inner cell mass specification. Nature 466, 1129–1133 (2010).
Ko, M. et al. Impaired hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine in myeloid cancers with
mutant TET2. Nature 468, 839–843 (2010).
Iyer, L. M., Tahiliani, M., Rao, A. & Aravind, L. Prediction of novel families of enzymes
involved in oxidative and other complex modifications of bases in nucleic acids.
Cell Cycle 8, 1698–1710 (2009).
Loenarz, C. & Schofield, C. J. Oxygenasecatalyzed 5-methylcytosine hydroxylation.
Chem. Biol. 16, 580–583 (2009).
Acknowledgements We thank B. Ren for assistance in next generation sequencing
using the Illumina platform. We thank M. Guttman for making his RNASeq data set
available to us. W.A.P. is supported by a predoctoral graduate research fellowship from
the National Science Foundation, and Y.H. by a postdoctoral fellowship from the
Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. R.L. is supported by a California Institute for
Regenerative Medicine Training Grant. This study was supported by the National
Institute of Health grants RC1 DA028422, R01 AI44432 and 1 R01 HD065812-01A1
and a grant from the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (to A.R.), a pilot grant
from Harvard Catalyst, The Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (NIH
Grant 1 UL1 RR 025758-02) and NIH K08 HL089150 (to S.A.), and a grant from the
Mary. K. Chapman Foundation (to J.R.E.).
4.
5.
6.
7
.
.
Author Contributions W.A.P., Y.B. and S.A. devised the GLIB method. W.A.P., S.A., H.R.H.
and E.M.M. optimized the GLIB method. Y.H. generated the anti-CMS antiserum, and
Y.H. and W.A.P. optimized the anti-CMS pull-down. W.A.P. and Y.H. grew ES cells. W.A.P.
prepared GLIB samples for sequencing, Y.H. prepared CMS samples, H.R.H. performed
MeDIPs. Helicos sequencing and mapping was performed by P.K. and P.M.M., Illumina
sequencing and mapping was performed by R.L. and J.R.E., and U.J.P. was responsible
for bioinformatic analysis. M.K. performed the anti-5hmC dot blot. W.A.P. and M.T.
performed anti-5hmC pull-downs. H.R.H. and S.M. performed and optimized in vitro
tests of Tet substrate specificity. W.A.P., S.A. andA.R. wrote the manuscript. S.A. andA.R.
coordinated research.
8
Koh, K. P. et al. Tet1 and Tet2 regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine production and
cell lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 8,
2
00–213 (2011).
Delhommeau, F. et al. Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers. N. Engl. J. Med. 360,
289–2301 (2009).
9
1
.
2
0. Zhang, H., Li, X. J., Martin, D. B. & Aebersold, R. Identification and quantification of
N-linked glycoproteins using hydrazide chemistry, stable isotope labeling and
mass spectrometry. Nature Biotechnol. 21, 660–666 (2003).
1
1
1
1
1
1. Song, C. X. et al. Selective chemical labeling reveals the genome-wide distribution
of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Nature Biotechnol. 29, 68–72 (2011).
2. Hayatsu, H. & Shiragami, M. Reaction of bisulfite with the 5-hydroxymethyl group
in pyrimidines and in phage DNAs. Biochemistry 18, 632–637 (1979).
3. Huang, Y. et al. The behaviour of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in bisulfite sequencing.
PLoS ONE 5, e8888 (2010).
Author Information Data have been deposited at GEO under accession number
4. Harris, T. D. et al. Single-molecule DNA sequencing of a viral genome. Science 320,
106–109 (2008).
5. Bowers, J. et al. Virtual terminator nucleotides for next-generation DNA
sequencing. Nature Methods 6, 593–595 (2009).
1
9 M A Y 2 0 1 1 | V O L 4 7 3 | N A T U R E | 3 9 7
©
2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved