L.L. Andersen et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 639 (2015) 289–293
291
were obtained from experiments performed in air and N2 diluent.
Linear least squares analysis of the data in Figure 1 gives
k6/k7 = 0.65 0.04 and k6/k8 = 1.28 0.08. Using k7 = (9.29 0.51)
× 10−11 and k8 = (5.07 0.34) × 10−11 [7] gives k6 = (6.03 0.48)
× 10–11 and (6.49 0.61) × 10–11 cm3 molecule–1 s–1, respectively.
The fact that consistent values of k6 were derived from experi-
ments using different reference compounds suggests the absence
of significant systematic errors in the present work. We choose
that Cl atoms are released during the OH initiated oxidation of
CF3CH CHCl [9]:
CF3CHCH(OH)Cl + M → Cl + CF3CH CH(OH) + M
(12)
The Cl atoms will react with cis-CF3CH CHCl and pose a chal-
lenge for the OH relative rate measurement of k9. Ideally, to
minimize such complications a competitor would be added to the
reaction mixtures to scavenge the Cl atoms. Alkanes, such as C2H6,
are often used as chlorine atom scavengers but are not suitable
for use in the present experiments because their reactivity toward
OH radicals is comparable to that of cis-CF3CH CHCl and hence
would scavenge both chlorine atoms and OH radicals. To account
for additional loss of cis-CF3CH CHCl in the OH relative rate exper-
iments caused by Cl atoms the system was modeled numerically. A
model was constructed which incorporated the concentrations of
cis-CF3CH CHCl, C2H4, and C2H2 used in the experiments, values
of k6–k8 and k9–k11 given above, and a chlorine atom yield of 40%
from OH radical initiated oxidation as found for trans-CF3CH CHCl
[9]. The value of k9 in the model was iterated starting with an uncor-
rected value, computing a correction, and then using the corrected
value in the model to reevaluate the correction. The correction
was larger for the experiments using C2H4 as reference than for
those using C2H2 as reference. This reflects the fact that there is an
approximately 5-fold difference in the rate coefficient ratios k6/k7
and k9/k10, while there is only approximately 10% difference in the
rate coefficient ratios k6/k8 and k9/k11. The corrections applied to
the C2H4 data were approximately 20% while those to the C2H2 data
were approximately 5%. Correcting for the impact of chlorine atoms
and propagating an additional 5% uncertainty to account for uncer-
tainties in the correction procedure gives k9/k10 = 0.103 0.014 and
k9/k11 = 0.960 0.082.
to quote
a final value for k6 which is the average of the
individual determinations together with uncertainties that encom-
pass the extremes of the two individual determinations, hence,
k6 = (6.26 0.84) × 10–11 cm3 molecule–1 s–1
.
CF3CH CHCl. We have previously studied the reactivity of chlorine
atoms toward trans-CF3CH CHCl. The rate coefficient ratios mea-
sured for the trans isomer using C2H4 and C2H2 references were
approximately 10% smaller [8] than those measured here showing
that the cis isomer is slightly more reactive than the trans isomer
hindrance.
3.2. Relative rate study of OH + cis-CF3CH CHCl
The kinetics of reaction (9) were measured relative to reactions
(10) and (11):
OH + cis-CF3CH CHCl → Products
OH + C2H4 → Products
(9)
(10)
(11)
OH + C2H2 → Products
Using k10 = 8.52 × 10−12 [10] and k11 = 8.45 × 10−13 [11]
gives k9 = (8.78 1.19) × 10–13 and (8.11 0.69) × 10–13 cm3
molecule–1 s–1. The fact that consistent values of k9 were derived
from experiments using different reference compounds sug-
gests the absence of significant systematic errors in the present
work. We choose to quote a final value for k9, which is the
encompass the extremes of the individual determinations, hence,
k9 = (8.45 1.52) × 10–13 cm3 molecule–1 s–1. This result is con-
sistent with the value of (9.46 0.22) × 10–13 cm3 molecule–1 s–1
reported by Gierczak et al. [12].
Initial reaction mixtures consisted of 58.5–63.2 mTorr cis-
CF3CH CHCl, 108–205.7 mTorr CH3ONO, and 7.05–7.35 mTorr
C2H4 or 4.26–7.35 mTorr C2H2, and 0–14.7 mTorr NO in a total
pressure of 700 Torr air and N2 diluent. Figure 2 shows the loss
of cis-CF3CH CHCl plotted as a function of the loss of the reference
compound.
Linear least squares analysis of the data in Figure 2 gives
k9/k10 = 0.129 0.016 and k9/k11 = 1.01 0.07. We have shown
3.3. Relative rate study of OH + trans-CF3CH CHCl
We have previously conducted a relative rate study of the kinet-
ics of the reaction of OH radicals with trans-CF3CH CHCl using
C2H4 and C2H2 as references and reported rate coefficient ratios
of k13/k10 = 0.053 0.003 and k13/k11 = 0.506 0.031 [8].
OH + trans-CF3CH CHCl → Products
(13)
As discussed above, the formation of chlorine atoms is an
unavoidable complication in relative rate studies of the reac-
tion of OH radicals with CF3CH CHCl. To compute corrections
to account for chlorine chemistry in the OH experiments a
model was constructed which incorporated the concentrations
of trans-CF3CH CHCl, C2H4, and C2H2 used in the previous
experiments, values of k6, k7, k8, k10, k11, and k13, and a chlo-
rine atom yield of 40% from OH radical initiated oxidation of
trans-CF3CH CHCl. The corrections applied to the C2H4 data
were approximately 20% while those for the C2H2 data were
and propagating an addition 5% uncertainty to account for uncer-
tainties in the correction procedure gives k13/k10 = 0.042 0.004
and k13/k11 = 0.430 0.034. Using k10 = 8.52 × 10−12 [10] and
k11 = 8.45 × 10−13 [11] gives k13 = (3.58 0.34) × 10–13 and
Figure 2. Loss of cis-CF3CH CHCl relative to C2H4 (circles) and C2H2 (triangles) in
the presence of OH radicals in 700 Torr total pressure of air and N2, 296 1 K. The
error bars reflect the uncertainty in the determination of the reactant concentra-
tions.