RSC Advances
Paper
23
acid and the insolubility of melamine sulfate make it can be specic surface area was calculated by applying the Brunauer–
easily separated from the nonionic surfactant. Triton X-100 was Emmett–Teller (BET) model to the adsorption data. Elemental
used to modify the structure of melamine sulfate as it can be analyses (C, H, N, S) were performed on a EuroVector S.P.A.
easily removed by simple washing. As a result, the as-prepared Euro EA3000 elemental analyzer. UV-vis diffuse reectance
npg-CN samples possessed high BET surface areas and low spectra (UV-vis DRS) were measured using a Shimadzu UV3600
molar ratios of C/N. The nal samples were characterized in spectrophotometer. The photoluminescence (PL) spectra were
terms of chemical structure, morphology, and optical proper- performed on a Hitachi F-7000 uorescence spectrophotometer
ties. The photocatalytic activity of the obtained samples was with photomultiplier tube voltage of 400 V and scanning speed
ꢀ
1
tested by evaluating the degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) dye of 1200 nm min . The TG-DTA curves were recorded on DTG-
ꢀ
1
under visible light illumination.
60A (Shimadzu) at a heating rate of 10 K min under the
ow of N gas.
2
2
. Experimental section
2.4 Photocatalytic evaluation
2.1 Synthesis of Triton X-100-modied-melamine sulfate
The photocatalytic activity of the samples was evaluated by
degradation of RhB under visible light irradiation. A 500 W
Xenon lamp (Institute of Electric Light Source, Beijing) with 400
nm cutoff lter was chosen as a visible light source. The
All reagents were of analytical grade without further treatment.
In a typical synthetic procedure, 5.0 g melamine and a certain
amount of Triton X-100 (with mass ratios to melamine of 0.3,
0
.5, 0.7 and 1.0) was added into 100 mL distilled water, and then
ꢁ
temperature of the reaction solution was kept at approximately
the mixture was heated at 100 C in an oil bath with stir for 1
hour under reuxing. Then 2 mL concentrated sulfuric acid (98
wt%) was added to the solution dropwise along with white
ꢁ
2
0 C by equipped with a cooling water sleeve surrounding the
lamp. The distance between the light source and the surface of
the reaction solution was 15 cm. In a typical experiment, 0.1 g of
photocatalyst was suspended in RhB aqueous solution (100 mL,
precipitates gradually formed, and the mixture was stirred at
ꢁ
1
00 C for another hour. Aer naturally cooling down to room
ꢀ1
1
0 mg L ), and then stirred in the dark for 1 hour to reach the
temperature, the precipitate was ltrated and washed three
ꢁ
adsorption–desorption equilibrium. During the visible light
irradiation, an aliquot of 5 mL containing the sample was taken
from the reaction suspensions at given time intervals, and then
centrifuged to remove the photocatalyst particles. Subse-
quently, the solutions were measured with the UV-vis spectro-
photometer at wavelength of 554 nm. The concentration
times with distilled water, and then dried in an oven at 80 C
overnight. The obtained samples were the Triton X-100-
modied-melamine sulfate, denoted as MST-0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and
1.0, respectively. For comparison, melamine sulfate (MAS) was
also prepared by the same method without adding Triton X-100.
0 0
changes were described by C/C , where C is the initial
2
.2 Synthesis of nanoporous graphitic carbon nitride
concentration of RhB (aer subtraction of the concentration of
RhB which was adsorbed to the catalysts) and C is the remained
concentration of RhB. The RhB degradation ratio (DR) was
5.0 g MST was put into an alumina crucible with a cover and
ꢁ
then heated to 500 C in a muffle furnace for 2 hours in air with
a heating rate of 2 C min . Further heat treatment was set at
5
ꢁ
ꢀ1
determined by DR ¼ [1 ꢀ (C/C
0
)] ꢂ 100%. The degradation rate
ꢁ
20, 550, 580 and 600 C under the same condition for another 2
was monitored by the rate constant (k), which can be calculated
hours, respectively. The nal products were denoted as npg-CN-
xy, in which x represents the mass ratios (0.3, 0.5, 0.7, and 1.0)
of Triton X-100 to melamine, and y ¼ a, b, c and d, represents
from the tted curve of the rst-order equation: ln(C
0
/C) ¼ kt.
ꢁ
3. Results and discussion
the nal heating temperature of 520, 550, 580 and 600 C,
respectively. For comparison, the melamine and melamine
sulfate were treated with the same heating program, while the
further heat treatment was just kept at 550 C for 2 hours. The
obtained samples were denoted as bulk g-CN and CN–MAS,
respectively.
3
.1 Chemical structure and texture of npg-CN samples
The chemical structure of the npg-CN samples was character-
ized by means of XRD, FT-IR, and elemental analysis. Fig. 1
shows the XRD patterns and FT-IR spectra of npg-CN samples
prepared with different mass ratios of Triton X-100 to melamine
at 550 C. The XRD patterns (Fig. 1a) of all the npg-CN samples
are similar to that of bulk g-CN. The strongest peak around 2q ¼
ꢁ
ꢁ
2.3 Characterization
ꢁ
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected in a Bruker 27.4 is attributed to the typical graphitic interlayer (002) peak
ꢁ
D8FOCUS powder diffractometer with Cu Ka irradiation (l ¼ with d ¼ 0.326 nm, and another peak at about 2q ¼ 13 , cor-
0.15406 nm). The Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) of responding to a distance of 0.67 nm and indexed as (100)
the samples were performed using a Nicolet iS10 spectrometer. spacing of g-CN, can be attributed to the in-plane structural
24
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission packing motif of g-CN. Compared with that of bulk g-CN, the
electron microscopy (TEM) images were taken with Hitachi (002) peaks of npg-CN samples shi to slightly lower angle and
S4700 and Tecnai G220 microscope, respectively. Nitrogen becomes broader with reducing intensity, indicating the
sorption measurements were accomplished with N at 77 K aer increased interlayer distance and the less crystallinity of npg-CN
2
ꢁ
degassing the samples at 300 C under vacuum for 3 hours samples. But the higher heating temperature results in higher
using a Quantachrome Quadrasorb SI-MP porosimeter. The crystallinity of npg-CN (Fig. S1†), corresponding to previous
61878 | RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 61877–61883
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014