N.G. Deniz, C. Sayil and D. Akyüz et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1224 (2021) 129145
3
known quinone compounds 4, 7, 9, 10, 12 and 19 were previously
reported in the related literature [16,21–23]. The both study of
crystal structure determination of compounds 4, 7 and their elec-
trochemical properties of compounds (4, 7, 9, 10, 12, 19) were
firstly investigated in this study. The electrochemical properties of
all synthesized compounds were investigated in this study.
Yield: 0.57 g (45%); Red oil; Rf = 0.40 (CHCl ); FT-IR (KBr pellet,
3
cm 1): 3071 (CHarom), 2968, 2927, 2874 (C-H), 1663 (C=O), 1593
−
1
(C=C); H NMR (499.74 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 0.9 (t, J = 8.34 Hz,
3
3H, CH ), 1.1 (t, J = 7.32 Hz, 3H, CH ), 1.4 (d, 3H, CH ), 1.45-1.6
3
3
3
(m, 2H, CH ), 3.8 (m, 1H, S-CH), 4.4-4.5 (q, 2H, O-CH ), 7.55 (t,
2
2
J = 7.32 Hz, 1H, Harom), 7.65 (d, 1H, Harom), 7.95 (dd, J = 7.81 Hz,
J = 6.35 Hz, 1H, Harom), 8.0 ppm (dd, J = 6.84 Hz, J = 5.32 Hz,
Method 1: Sodium carbonate (1.52 g) was dissolved (60 mL)
in ethanol. 2,3-Dichloro-1,4-naphthoquinone 1 and nucle-
ophiles 2 or (5, 6) or 11 or (6, 14) were added slowly to
this solution. Without heating, the mixture was stirred for
1
H, Harom); 13C NMR (125.66 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 14.93, 14.99, 17.35
3
(
CH ), 20.02 (CH ), 29.34 (S-CH), 68.92 (-OCH ), 125.80, 125.87,
3 2 2
1
31.37, 132.47, 132.60, 132.85 (CHarom, Carom), 133.23 (=C-S), 157.53
+
(
=C-O), 178.68, 181.86 ppm (C=O); MS [+ESI]: m/z 290 [M] ,
O S (M = 290.383 g/mol). Calculated: C, 66.18; H, 6.24; S,
6
hours. The color of the solution quickly changed and the
extent of the reaction was monitored by TLC. Chloroform
30 mL) was added to the reaction mixture. The organic
C
H
18
16
3 1
1
1.04%. Found: C, 66.19; H, 6.25; S, 11.04%.
-(Butylsulfanyl)-3-etoxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (15):
Compound 15 was synthesized from reaction of 1 (1.0 g, 4.40
(
2
layer was washed with water (4 × 30 mL), and dried with
Na2SO4. After the solvent was evaporated the residue was
purified by column chromatography on silica gel.
mmol) with 6 (0.84 g, 4.40 mmol) and 14 (0.39 g, 4.40 mmol) ac-
cording to the method 1. Yield: 0.47 g (37%); Red oil; Rf = 0.40
Method 2: 2,3-Dichloro-1,4-naphthoquinone 1 and nucleophile
compound 6 in the presence of dimethylformamide (DMF)
(
(
CHCl ); FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm 1): 3071 (CHarom), 2959, 2929, 2872
−
3
1
C-H), 1662 (C=O), 1593 (C=C); H NMR (499.74 MHz, CDCl ):
(
50 mL) were stirred and heated at 60°C for 6 hours. The
3
δ = 0.95 (t, J = 8.34 Hz, 3H, CH ), 1.2 (t, J = 7.32 Hz, 3H, CH ),
extent of the reaction was monitored by Thin-Layer Chro-
matography (TLC). Chloroform (30 mL) was added to the re-
action mixture. The organic layer was washed with water
3
3
1
.4 (m, 2H, 6.84 Hz, 1H, Harom), 7.60 (d, 1H, Harom), 7.68 (dd,
J = 7.81 Hz, J = 6.85 Hz, 1H, Harom), 7.95 (dd, J = 6.84 Hz, J = 5.32
Hz, 1H, Harom), 8.2 (dd, J = 5.84 Hz, J = 6.84 Hz, 1H, Harom);
(
4 × 30 mL) and dried with Na2SO4. After the solvent was
1
3
C NMR (125.66 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 14.88, 15.00 (CH ), 20.84,
evaporated the residue was purified by column chromatog-
raphy on silica gel.
3
3
2
8.67 (CH ), 31.26 (S-CH ), 68.89 (-OCH ), 125.36, 125.57, 125.85,
2 2 2
1
25.95, 132.50, 132.56 (CHarom, Carom), 133.26 (=C-S), 156.77 (=C-
Method 3: 2,3-Dichloro-1,4-naphthoquinone 1 and nucleophiles
+
O), 177.90, 181.89 ppm (C=O); MS [+ESI]: m/z 290 [M] , 275 [M-
6
and 18 in the presence of chloroform (50 mL) were stirred
+
(
CH )] ; C
H
16 18
O S (M = 290.383 g/mol). Calculated: C, 66.18; H,
3 1
without heating for 8 hours. The extent of the reaction was
monitored by TLC. Chloroform (30 mL) was added to the re-
action mixture. The organic layer was washed with water
3
6
.24; S, 11.04%. Found: C, 66.17; H, 6.25; S, 11.05%.
-(Butylsulfanyl)-3-(7-sulphanyl-4-methyl-coumarinyl)-1,4-
2
naphthoquinone (16):
(
4 × 30 mL) and dried with Na2SO4. After the solvent was
Compound 16 was synthesized from reaction of 1 (1.0 g, 4.40
mmol) with 6 (0.84 g, 4.40 mmol) and 14 (0.39 g, 4.40 mmol) ac-
evaporated the residue was purified by column chromatog-
raphy on silica gel.
cording to the method 1. Yield: 0.48 g (25%); Black oil; R = 0.50
f
2
-Benzylsulfanyl-3-ethoxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (3):
−1
(
(
CHCl ); FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm ): 3062 (CHarom), 2959, 2928, 2871
3
Compound 3 was synthesized from reaction of 1 (1.0 g, 4.40
mmol) with 2 (0.54 g, 4.40 mmol) according to the method 1.
1
C-H), 1621 (C=O), 1600 (C=C); H NMR (499.74 MHz, CDCl ):
3
δ = 0.84 (t, J = 8.34 Hz, 3H, CH ), 1.3-1.4 (m, 2H, CH ), 1.6
3
2
Yield: 0.78 g (52%); Red oil; Rf = 0.40 (CHCl ); FT-IR (KBr pel-
3
(
m, 2H, S-CH -CH ), 2.3 (s, 3H, CH ), 3.3 (t, J = 7.32 Hz, 2H, S-
2
2
3
let, cm 1): 3063 (CHarom), 2923, 2852 (C-H), 1661 (C=O), 1600
−
13
CH ), 6.1 (s, 1H, CH), 7.1-8.1 (m, 7H, Harom);
C NMR (125.66
2
1
(
C=C); H NMR (499.74 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 1.18 (t, J = 6.84 Hz, 3H,
3
MHz, CDCl ): δ = 12.57, 17.58 (CH ), 20.81 (CH ), 31.45 (S-CH -
3
3
2
2
CH ), 4.4 (q, 2H, O-CH ), 6.1 (s, 2H, S-CH -Ph), 7.0-8.2 ppm (m, 9H,
3
2
2
CH ), 34.0 (S-CH ), 113.69 (CH), 115.83, 117.56, 123.75, 123.99,
2
2
Harom); 13C NMR (125.66 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 12.41 (CH ), 28.67 (S-
3
3
126.24, 131.38, 131.99, 132.72, 133.11, 138.54, 139.08 (CHarom,
CH ), 65.17 (-OCH ), 113.91, 117.70, 123.93, 126.19, 126.29, 127.70,
2
2
Carom), 150.95, 152.63 (=C-S), 159.27 (C=O), 176.30, 178.75 ppm
1
31.94, 132.81, 133.07, 135.88 (CHarom, Carom), 138.42 (=C-S), 153.07
+
(
C=O); MS [+ESI]: m/z 437 [M] . C
H
O S (M = 436.54 g/mol).
4 2
24
20
+
(
=C-O), 176.39, 178.69 ppm (C=O); MS [+ESI]: m/z 348 [M+Na] ;
Calculated: C, 66.03; H, 4.62; S, 14.69%. Found: C, 66.04; H, 4.65;
S, 14.65%.
C
9
H
O S (M = 324.402 g/mol). Calculated: C, 70.34; H, 4.97; S,
3 1
1
9
16
.88%. Found: C, 70.33; H, 4.95; S, 9.89%.
-Etylsulfanyl-3-ethoxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (8):
Compound 8 was synthesized from reaction of 1 (1.0 g, 4.40
2-(7-Sulphanyl-4-methyl-coumarinyl)-3-chloro-1,4-
2
naphthoquinone (17):
Compound 17 was synthesized from reaction of 1 (1.0 g, 4.40
mmol) with 6 (0.84 g, 4.40 mmol) according to the method 2.
Yield: 0.72 g (43%); Orange oil; R = 0.50 (CHCl ); FT-IR (KBr pel-
mmol) with 5 (0.27 g, 4.40 mmol) and 6 (0.84 g, 4.40 mmol) ac-
cording to the method 1. Yield: 0.47 g (41%); Red oil; Rf = 0.50
f
3
−
(
(
CHCl ); FT-IR (KBr pellet, cm 1): 3071 (CHarom), 2975, 2927, 2869
−1
1
3
let, cm ): 3019 (CHarom), 2400 (C-H), 1670 (C=O), 1600 (C=C);
H
1
C-H), 1659 (C=O), 1591 (C=C); H NMR (499.74 MHz, CDCl ):
3
NMR (499.74 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 2.3 (s, CH ), 6.2 (s, 1H, CH), 7.1-8.2
3
3
δ = 1.2 (t, J = 8.34 Hz, 3H, CH ), 1.4 (t, J = 7.32 Hz, 3H, CH ),
13
3
3
(
m, 7H, Harom); C NMR (125.66 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 17.60 (CH ),
3
3
3
.2 (q, 2H, S-CH ), 4.4 (q, 2H, O-CH ), 7.65 (t, J = 7.32 Hz, 1H,
2
2
1
14.46 (CH), 117.98 (=C-CH ), 118.57, 124.11, 125.54, 126.64, 126.71,
3
Harom), 7.55 (d, 1H, Harom), 7.92 (dd, J = 7.81 Hz, J = 6.35 Hz,
1
30.18, 131.10, 133.45, 133.49, 136.09, 144.17 (CHarom, Carom), 144.72
1
1
H, Harom), 7.95 ppm (dd, J = 6.84 Hz, J = 5.32 Hz, 1H, Harom);
C NMR (125.66 MHz, CDCl ): δ = 14.25, 14.87 (CH ), 28.67 (S-
(
=C-S), 150.69 (S-C=), 152.53 (=C-Cl), 159.03 (=C-O), 174.62,
3
3
3
+
1
77.35 ppm (C=O); MS [+ESI]: m/z 383 [M] , MS/MS [+ESI]: m/z
CH ), 68.91 (-OCH ), 125.38, 125.71, 130.46, 131.37, 132.52, 132.58
+
2
2
3
47 [M-Cl]+, 319 [M-(Cl+CH+CH )] ; C
H
20 11
O S Cl (M = 382.77
3
4
1
1
(
(
(
CHarom, Carom), 133.42 (=C-S), 156.72 (=C-O), 177.91, 181.91 ppm
g/mol). Calculated: C, 62.75; H, 2.89; S, 8.37%. Found: C, 62.73; H,
+
+
C=O); MS [+ESI]: m/z 262 [M] , 235 [M-(CH -CH )] ; C
H O S
14 14 3 1
2
3
5
.85; S, 8.35%.
-Morpholinyl-3-(7-sulphanyl-4-methyl-coumarinyl)-1,4-
M = 262.332 g/mol). Calculated: C, 61.10; H, 5.37; S, 12.22%.
2
Found: C, 61.03; H, 5.35; S, 12.25%.
-(Isopropylsulfanyl)-3-etoxy-1,4-naphthoquinone (13):
naphthoquinone (20):
2
Compound 20 was synthesized from reaction of 1 (1.0 g, 4.40
mmol) with 6 (0.84 g, 4.40 mmol) and 18 (0.84 g, 4.40 mmol) ac-
Compound 13 was synthesized from reaction of 1 (1.0 g, 4.40
mmol) with 11 (0.39 g, 4.40 mmol) according to the method 1.