Hydrolysis of Formamide
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 18, 1999 4357
reaction needed in the calculation of the nitrogen isotope effect, the
formyl hydrogen isotope effect, and the carbonyl oxygen exchange with
solvent. For the carbonyl carbon and carbonyl oxygen isotope effects
the fraction of reaction was determined by manometric measurements
of the amount of CO2 produced via oxidation of formate. In separate
control experiments the two methods of measuring the fraction of
reaction were shown to be in close agreement.
incapable of exchange because at least one hydrogen must be
present on the nitrogen of the tetrahedral intermediate to catalyze
proton transfer between oxygen atoms. Recent studies by Brown
and co-workers4 on a series of toluamides included several
tertiary amides that did exchange the carbonyl oxygen with the
solvent. The current interpretation is that the extent of carbonyl
oxygen exchange of an amide is mostly dependent on the
basicity of the amine.4
Isotope ratios for the heavy-atom isotope effects were determined
on a Finnigan Delta-E isotope ratio mass spectrometer; isotopic
compositions are given as δ(13C) for carbon, δ(18O) for oxygen, and
δ(15N) for nitrogen. The δ value represents a per mil (‰) difference in
the isotope ratio compared to a tank standard. In the oxygen exchange
experiments the 18O/16O ratio of the carbonyl oxygen of unreacted
formamide was measured on a Shimadzu QP or a Hewlett-Packard
1800A GC-MS, equipped with an XT-1 nonpolar column; the 18O/
16O ratio of the product, formate, was measured with a Bruker 360
NMR spectrometer, utilizing the isotope shift of the carbonyl carbon.
The ratio of 1-d-formamide to 1-h-formamide in the formyl hydrogen
isotope effects was determined on a Hewlett-Packard Series II (model
5890) gas chromatograph, equipped with a 60 m carbowax column.
Syntheses. Knowledge of the isotopic composition of the carbonyl
oxygen of formamide is needed to determine the oxygen nucleophile
isotope effect. This δ(18O) cannot be determined directly. Consequently,
formamide was synthesized from methyl formate, for which the isotopic
composition of the carbonyl oxygen can be determined by a published
decarbonylation procedure.11 To synthesize this formamide, a dry
methanolic solution which was 0.89 M in methyl formate and 1.88 M
in ammonia was allowed to react under dry nitrogen at room
temperature for 21 h. The methanol and ammonia were removed by
rotary evaporation, and the remaining material (crude yield 100%) was
distilled under reduced pressure. A sample of this purified formamide
was hydrolyzed completely and then oxidized by I2/DMSO. Finally,
the δ(13C) of the carbonyl carbon was determined by isotope ratio mass
spectrometry of the resulting CO2 (see below). The fact that the isotope
ratio of the carbonyl carbon of formamide did not change significantly
(<1 per mil) from that of the starting methyl formate infers that the
conversion was complete and the isotope ratio for the carbonyl oxygen
must also be unchanged during the synthesis and purification of
formamide.
The nature of the steps for decomposition of the tetrahedral
intermediates (k3 and k4) is not fully understood. Solvent isotope
effects, which are often complicated to interpret, tend to indicate
that the nitrogen of fairly basic amines (such as aliphatic amines)
is fully protonated prior to leaving;4 however, a concerted proton
transfer with a late transition state remains a possible alternative.
Isotope effects have provided detailed information concerning
the transition-state structure of many acyl group transfer
reactions. However, only a few such studies have been reported
for the reactions of amides. Kirsch determined the formyl
hydrogen isotope effect on the alkaline hydrolysis of form-
amide.5 This isotope effect is dependent on the concentration
of hydroxide, consistent with a term in the rate law that is both
first- and second-order in hydroxide. Kirsch fitted these data to
the mechanism of eq 1 and calculated the kinetic isotope effects
for formation of T- (Dk1 ) 0.65), breakdown of T- (Dk3 ) 1.58),
and breakdown of T2- (Dk4 ) 1.41), indicating fairly late
transition states in all cases. There are only a few reports of
heavy-atom isotope effects on amide hydrolysis. Leaving group
nitrogen isotope effects for chymotrypsin-catalyzed hydrolysis
of N-acetyl-L-tryptophanamide9 (15kobs ) 1.010 at pH 8) and
papain-catalyzed hydrolysis of N-benzoyl-L-argininamide10 (15kobs
) 1.023 at pH 8) were carried out by O′Leary. The difference
between the isotope effects for the two enzyme-catalyzed
reactions appears to be due to different partitioning ratios of
the intermediates. The leaving group nitrogen isotope effect on
the alkaline hydrolysis of benzamide (15kobs ) 1.004) was
reported as an unpublished result in ref 9.
1-d-Formamide was synthesized in an identical manner from 1-d-
methyl formate. The purified product was mixed in a 1:1 ratio with
natural 1-h-formamide and used in the formyl hydrogen isotope effect
experiments.
In this paper we present isotope effects for all of the atoms
at the reactive center of formamide during hydrolysis in dilute
alkaline solution, where the reaction is largely first-order in
hydroxide ion concentration. We are primarily interested in the
mechanism of the first-order reaction because of its similarity
to the mechanism of enzyme-catalyzed amide bond hydrolysis
and, hence, its suitability as a model. The results of these
experiments allow a detailed picture of the transition-state
structure for this reaction. In addition, the solvent oxygen
nucleophile isotope effect allows determination of the actual
nucleophile (water or hydroxide) for the reaction.
Carbonyl Carbon and Carbonyl Oxygen Isotope Effect Proce-
dures. The carbonyl carbon and carbonyl oxygen isotope effects were
measured by a slight modification of the previously published
procedure.11 In a typical experiment a low conversion sample contained
0.10-0.20 M KOH and 0.20 M formamide in a total volume of 2.0
mL. After a reaction time of 15 min (10-32% reaction) the reaction
was quenched by addition of 1.0 mL of HEPES buffer, pH 7.5. This
solution was transferred to a round-bottom flask equipped with a side
arm which contained a stopcock. Water was removed by heating this
flask to 85 °C under high vacuum for a minimum of 3 h, after which
2.0 mL of anhydrous DMSO containing 300 mg of I2 was added through
a septum attached to the side arm. The CO2 was collected into a U-tube
at liquid nitrogen temperature after first being passed through two liquid
nitrogen-pentane traps. Control experiments with formamide in the
absence of KOH failed to produce any CO2 when subjected to the drying
and oxidation procedure, making removal of unreacted formamide
unnecessary. The δ(18O) and δ(13C) of the resulting CO2 were
determined by isotope ratio mass spectrometry. High conversion
samples were prepared by allowing a solution which was 0.20 M
formamide and 1.4 M KOH to react for a minimum of 50 min. This
solution was quenched with 0.6 mL of 1.0 M HCl and 1.0 mL of 1.0
M HEPES, pH 7.5. The solution was then dried, oxidized, and analyzed
as above.
Experimental Section
Materials and Methods. Formamide and HEPES buffer were from
Sigma Chemical Co. Methyl formate (anhydrous), DMSO (anhydrous),
triphenylmethane, sodium hydride (60% oil suspension), and 2.0 M
ammonia in methanol were obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co. Iodine
(sublimed) was from Mallinckrodt Chemical Co. All were of reagent
grade or better and were used without further purification. Water
containing 99 atom % 18O was obtained from Isotec Inc. for the GC-
MS method, and that containing 96 atom % 18O was obtained from
Icon Services Inc. for the NMR method. 1-d-Methyl formate (99 atom
%) was obtained from Aldrich Chemical Co.
The UV spectra were measured on a Cary 4 UV-vis spectropho-
tometer. A UV assay at 240 nm was used to determine the fraction of
Leaving Nitrogen Isotope Effect Procedure. Low conversion
samples for the nitrogen isotope effects were prepared by allowing a
5.0 mL solution which was 0.20 M in formamide and 0.10-0.20 M in
(8) Bunton, C. A.; Nayak, B. O′Conner, C. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33,
572.
(9) O′Leary, M. H.; Kluetz, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 3585.
(10) O′Leary, M. H.; Urberg, M.; Young, A. P. Biochemistry 1974, 13,
2077.
(11) Marlier, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5953.