Permanganate Oxidation of Benzaldehyde
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 65, No. 2, 2000 575
Ta ble 3. Ca lcu la ted En er gies
Total Energies (H) and Zero-Point Energies (kcal/mol)
B3P86
compound
ꢀ ) 1
ꢀ ) 80
s2
MP2
s2
PMP2
ZPEa
PhCH(OH)2
PhCH(OH)O
PhCHO2
-423.30974
-422.7274
-421.94593
-422.64446
-422.11418
-421.41830
-423.31835
-422.81387
-422.25068
-422.65671
-422.19381
-421.66661
-420.69582
-420.09920
-419.27707
-420.04346
-419.49366
-418.76404
83.6
74.5
65.0
73.1
66.4
58.2
-
2
-
PhC(OH)2
PhC(OH)O
PhCO2
0.776
0.763
0.756
0.766
1.035
0.809
-420.04560
-419.51153
-418.76903
-
2
-
C-H Bond Dissociation Energies (kcal/mol)b
compound
PMP2
B3P86, ꢀ ) 1
B3P86, ꢀ ) 80
PhCH(OH)2
PhCH(OH)O
PhCHO2
85
48
0
93
63
11
91
68
46
-
-
2
a
HF/6-31G* zero-point energies scaled by 0.893. b The MP2/6-31G* energy of a hydrogen atom is 0.49823 H. DFT models lead to an
incorrect energy for a hydrogen atom because they attempt to introduce correction for electron correlation in this atom, for which there
cannot be any such energy. Thus, the correct value, 0.50000 H, was used.
manganate to give Mn(VI). Similar pathways may be
written for the dianion.
electrostatic energies by over 100 kcal/mol. The effect of
a polar solvent was examined using the SCIPCM reaction
field model, and the results are included in Table 3. In
8
Path c seems relatively unlikely because it does not
directly involve the aldehyde hydrogen and could only
give a secondary isotope effect. Thus, this process is not
likely to give a kinetic isotope effect of 3.5, as has been
observed for the reaction. It is not possible to distinguish
between the remaining paths on the basis of just the
available experimental data.
the case of anions, the electron density distribution is
fairly diffuse. As a result, a significant part of the total
3
electron density lies outside the 0.0004 e/au isodensity
surface that is usually taken to give the size and shape
of the solute. As a result, it was necessary to scale the
charge so that all would lie within the solvent cavity. It
can be seen that the calculated dissociation energies for
benzaldehyde hydrate and the monoanion are not much
affected by going from the gas phase to a polar medium.
In the case of the dianion, the calculated BDE increases
significantly on going to a polar medium, and as noted
below, this is due to the two negative charges being better
dispersed in the dianion radical than in the dianion. The
BDE is, nevertheless, significantly lower than that for
the monoanion. Further, only part of the charge redis-
tribution can occur in the transition state for C-H bond
cleavage in the hydrate dianion. Thus, the kinetic effect
of going from the hydrate monoanion to the dianion
should be between the gas phase and solution calculated
values.
Thus, we have carried a series of ab initio calculations
for the species that are involved. If the one-electron
transfer process c were involved, the conversion of the
monoanion to the dianion would have to result in a
marked reduction in the C-H bond dissociation energy
to account for the much more rapid reaction of the
5
dianion. Geometry optimizations were carried out at the
6
B3P86/6-311+G** level, which makes use of a relatively
flexible basis set including diffuse functions that have
been found to be important in describing anions and
includes correction for the effects of electron correlation.
In addition, density functional theory models have been
found to minimize spin contamination in free radicals.7
The results are summarized in Table 3.
Benzaldehyde hydrate has a calculated C-H bond
dissociation energy similar to that for toluene (88 kcal/
mol). The monoanion has a much smaller calculated
dissociation energy, and that for the dianion is remark-
ably small. It seemed possible that the density functional
method might give an anomalous energy for the dianion
radical. Thus, geometry optimizations were carried out
at the MP2/6-31G* level, and the calculated energies are
included in Table 3. The B3P86 and MP2 derived
dissociation energies differ by about 10 kcal/mol. How-
ever, the changes in BDE on going from benzaldehyde
hydrate to the monoanion and the dianion are the same
in both series, and both predict that the dianion will have
a low C-H dissociation energy.
The low dissociation energy of the dianion makes
process c a possible mechanism for the rate-determining
step. Process a is also possible because the dianion would
be a better hydride transfer reagent than the monoanion.
Process d is not excluded by any of the data. This brings
us back to the old question as to whether elements such
as manganese are able to accept two electrons in one step,
or if they are required to accept electrons one at a time.
Further calculations are being carried out to locate the
transition state for the reaction and to examine its
electron-transfer characteristics, taking the solvent into
account. These calculations will also allow the predication
of the kinetic hydrogen isotope effect, which may be
compared with the observed value.
2
-
Dianions are generally unstable in the gas phase and
eject an electron, forming a monoanion. They are, how-
ever, often stable in polar solvents that reduce their
The stability of the dianion radical, PhCO • , is
2
interesting in itself. To gain information on its bonding
and electron density distribution, its MP2 wave function
was examined using Bader’s theory of atoms in mol-
(
5) Gardner, K. A.; Mayer, J . M. Science 1995, 269, 1849. These
9
ecules. Both the AIM analysis and the Mulliken popu-
authors have shown that the rates of permanganate oxidation of C-H
bonds are related to the bond dissociation energies.
(
6) Becke, A. D. J . Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. Perdew, J . P. Phys.
Rev. 1986, B33, 5048.
7) Wiberg, K. B.; Cheeseman, J . R.; Ochterski, J .; Frisch, M. J . J .
Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6535
(8) Foresman, J .; Keith, T. A.; Wiberg, K. B.; Snoonian, J .; Frisch,
M. J . J . Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16098.
(9) Bader, R. F. W. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory;
Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1990.
(