Angewandte Chemie International Edition
10.1002/anie.201804142
COMMUNICATION
electrolysis (Figure S24a), which was probably due to the
reduction of PdO to Pd. Indeed, the XRD analysis (Figure 4c)
revealed that the initial Pd-PdO was completely reduced and
transferred to metallic Pd after the electrolysis. Meanwhile, both
Keywords: CO reduction reaction (CO RR) • palladium • tin
2
2
oxide • methanol • interface
[
1] a) J. Albo, M. Alvarez-Guerra, P. Castaño, et al., Green Chem. 2015, 17,
formate and CH
process (Figure 4d). However, only formate was detected when
the as-resulted pure Pd electrode was re-used for CO RR in fresh
electrolyte. We thus speculate the Pd-oxide interface plays a
catalytic role on CO electroreduction to CH OH. As proposed in
Figure S25, the electroreduction of CO on Pd/SnO NSs takes
first adsorbs on the surface of SnO and reduces
gets further electrons and H+ to form
3
OH were detected as electrolytic products in this
2
304-2324; b) X. Sun, Q. Zhu, X. Kang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
016, 55, 6771-6775; c) M. Asadi, B. Kumar, A. Behranginia, et al., Nat.
2
2
Commun. 2014, 5, 4470; d) S. Gao, X. Jiao, Z. Sun, et al., Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 698-702; e) K. P. Kuhl, T. Hatsukade, E. R. Cave, et
al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14107-14113; f) M. Asadi, K. Kim, C.
Liu, et al., Science 2016, 353, 467-470; g) Y. Hori, H. Wakebe, T.
Tsukamoto, et al., Electrochim. Acta. 1994, 39, 1833-1839.
2
3
2
2
place with CO
2
2
•- [3a]
•-
to CO
2
.
Then CO
2
COads.[3b] While competing with Pd(II) for electrons, the CO
[2] Y. Hori, Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry, Springer, 2008.
[3] a) D. D. Zhu, J. L. Liu, S. Z. Qiao, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3423-3452; b)
L. Zhang, Z. J. Zhao, J. Gong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 11326-
11353.
3
intermediate has priority to be further reduced to CH OH. The
process is consistent with the mechanism for CO
2
1a, 1b]
electroreduction to CH
3
OH as reported.[
Thinking about the
-
[1a]
possibility of HCOO as an intermediate to get methanol, CO
[
4] a) A. Chen, C. Ostrom, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 11999-12044; b) C.
Bianchini, P. K. Shen, Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 4183-4206.
-
and HCOO were individually used as starting materials and
compared in similar electroreduction (Figure S26); NMR results
showed that CO could be reduced to methanol but not HCOO ,
[
5] a) D. Gao, H. Zhou, J. Wang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4288-
-
4
291; b) W. Sheng, S. Kattel, S. Yao, et al., Energy Environ. Sci. 2017,
0, 1180-1185.
proving that the CO pathway was fit for Pd/SnO
the general importance of Pd-O-Sn interfaces on CO
synthesized the Pd Black/SnO via the similar SnCl
Figure S27). The catalyst was found to be highly effective for the
electroreduction CO to CH OH (Figure S28) with a FE of 34%.
The stability of Pd-O-Sn interfaces in Pd/SnO NSs was also
2
NSs. To prove
RR, we also
hydrolysis
1
2
[
6] a) X. F. Bai, W. Chen, C. C. Zhao, et al., Angew Chem Int Edit 2017, 56,
2219-12223; b) S. Ma, M. Sadakiyo, M. Heima, et al., J. Am. Chem.
2
2
1
(
Soc. 2017, 139, 47-50.
2
3
[
[
7] R. Kortlever, I. Peters, C. Balemans, et al., Chem. Commun. 2016, 52,
2
10229-10232.
tested (Figure S29). After 8-h electrolysis with a high current
density, the Pd-O-Sn interfaces still survived to give a relatively
stable current. These results demonstrated that the strong
8] D. Gao, H. Zhou, F. Cai, et al., Nano Res. 2017, 10, 2181-2191.
[9] X. Huang, S. Tang, X. Mu, et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 28-32.
[10] a) Y. Sun, S. Gao, F. Lei, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 623-636; b)
L. Dai, Q. Qin, X. Zhao, et al., Sci. Adv. 2017; c) G. Fiori, F. Bonaccorso,
G. Iannaccone, et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 768-779; d) J. Liu, C.
Guo, A. Vasileff, et al., Small Methods 2017, 1, 1600006; e) S. Gao, Y.
Lin, X. Jiao, et al., Nature 2016, 529, 68-71; f) Z. Sun, T. Ma, H. Tao, et
al., Chem 2017, 3, 560-587; g) M. Chen, B. Wu, J. Yang, et al., Adv.
Mater. 2012, 24, 862-879.
interaction between Pd and SnO
interfaces gave rise to the electrocatalytic selectivity and stability
for the formation of CH OH.
In conclusion, we have built a hierarchical 2D material by
partially capping Pd NSs with SnO NPs for the electrochemical
reduction of CO . Compared to single Pd NSs and SnO NPs, the
hierarchical Pd/SnO NSs displayed a much better performance
in the multi-electron transfer reduction of CO into CH OH. The
selectivity and long-term stability were readily optimized by tuning
the coverage of SnO on Pd NSs. The high selectivity toward
CH OH are attributed to three factors: (1) Pd/SnO NSs possess
excellent adsorption capacity of CO ; (2) partially exposed Pd on
Pd/SnO NSs adsorbs CO* intermediate for further
electroreduction; (3) the existence of Pd-O-Sn interfaces assists
further reduction of CO* intermediate to CH OH. Given current
2
and as the built-up Pd-O-Sn
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
[
11] a) H. Won da, C. H. Choi, J. Chung, et al., ChemSusChem 2015, 8,
092-3098; b) F. Li, L. Chen, G. P. Knowles, et al., Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2017, 56, 505-509; c) F. Lei, W. Liu, Y. Sun, et al., Nat. Commun.
3
2
3
2
2016, 7, 12697; d) Q. Li, J. Fu, W. Zhu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017,
139, 4290-4293; e) Y. Chen, M. W. Kanan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134,
1986-1989.
2
2
[
12] H. Wang, A. L. Rogach, Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 123-133.
3
advances in the synthesis of hierarchical metal-oxide
heterostructures, the proposed strategy may open up a new
avenue to realized multi-electron transfer in CO RR.
2
[13] a) D. Gao, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhou, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 5652-
5655; b) W.-P. Zhou, S. Axnanda, M. G. White, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C.
2011, 115, 16467-16473; c) K. Mudiyanselage, S. D. Senanayake, L.
Feria, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 5101-5105; d) X. Zheng,
P. De Luna, F. P. García de Arquer, et al., Joule 2017, 1, 794-805.
[14] M. Brun, A. Berthet, J. C. Bertolini, J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom.
Acknowledgements
1
999, 104, 55-60.
The authors acknowledge support from the Ministry of Science
and Technology of China (2017YFA0207302, 2015CB932300),
the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21731005,
[15] a) Y. Zheng, T. Zhou, C. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55,
3408-3413; b) A. Baylet, P. Marecot, D. Duprez, et al., Phys. Chem.
Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 4607-4613.
2
1420102001, 21333008, and 21721001), and the fundamental
[
[
16] H. K. Wang, A. L. Rogach, Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 123-133.
research funds for central universities (20720160080). We also
acknowledge support from beamline BL14W1 (Shanghai
Synchrotron Radiation Facility) for providing beam time.
17] a) R. Liu, A. Sen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 17505-17512; b) B. H.
Wu, D. Y. Liu, S. Mubeen, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 1114-1117.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.