Paper
RSC Advances
decomposition into separate metals of cobalt and nickel was
observed aer the long-term test.
Notes and references
Aer the 30 hours' running at 700 ꢁC, the sizes of the metal
nanoparticles increased from 10–13 nm before reaction to
24–35 nm aer stability tests, shown in Table 1. Considering the
severe reaction conditions, the anti-sintering ability of the metal
nanoparticles was good. The average sizes of the bimetallic alloy
nanoparticles are in the range of 24–26 nm, and the sizes of the
monometal of nickel and cobalt are 32.7 and 34.2 nm respec-
tively. The crystallite sizes of the monometal particles are
obviously larger than the sizes of the bimetallic alloy nano-
particles, suggesting that the anti-sintering ability of the
bimetallic alloy nanoparticle is better.
The carbon deposition rates for the reaction at 700 ꢁC are
listed in Table 3. Low carbon deposition rates are observed over
studied catalysts. It was proposed that high temperature favors
the carbon eliminating reactions of the reverse Boudouard
reaction (eqn (4)) and the coke gasication reaction (eqn (5)):14,32
1 L. H. Huang, R. R. Chen, D. Chu and A. T. Hsu, Int.
J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35, 1138.
2 B. Lorenzut, T. Montini, L. De Rogatis, P. Canton,
A. Benedetti and P. Fornasiero, Appl. Catal., B, 2011, 101, 397.
3 W. Q. Xu, R. Si, S. D. Senanayake, J. Llorca, H. Idriss,
D. Stacchiola, J. C. Hanson and J. A. Rodriguez, J. Catal.,
2012, 291, 117.
4 N. Homs, J. Llorca and P. R. de la Piscina, Catal. Today, 2006,
116, 361.
5 A. L. Kustov, A. M. Frey, K. E. Larsen, T. Johannessen,
J. K. Nørskov and C. H. Christensen, Appl. Catal., A, 2007,
320, 98.
6 J. Bian, M. Xiao, S. J. Wang, Y. X. Lu and Y. Z. Meng, Appl.
Surf. Sci., 2009, 255, 7188.
7 D. L. Li, M. Koike, J. H. Chen, Y. Nakagawa and
K. Tomishige, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, 10959.
8 J. J. Wang, P. A. Chernavskii, A. Y. Khodakov and Y. Wang,
J. Catal., 2012, 286, 51–61.
9 M. A. Pena and J. L. G. Fierro, Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 1981.
10 K. J. May, C. E. Carlton, K. A. Stoerzinger, M. Risch,
J. Suntivich, Y. L. Lee, A. Grimaud and Y. Shao-Horn,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2012, 3, 3264.
11 J. Faye, A. Baylet, M. Trentesaux, S. Royer, F. Dumeignil,
D. Duprez, S. Valange and J. M. Tatibouet, Appl. Catal., B,
2012, 126, 134.
C + CO2 / 2CO
(4)
(5)
C + H2O / CO + H2
The amount of carbon deposited on the bimetallic alloy
catalysts was close to the monometal catalysts, and the carbon
deposition was not the main reason for the catalysts deactiva-
tion at the high reaction temperature.
12 D. Lin, Q. Wang, K. Peng and L. L. Shaw, J. Power Sources,
2012, 205, 100.
13 W. Zhou, J. Sunarso, M. W. Zhao, F. L. Liang, T. Klande and
A. Feldhoff, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 14036.
14 S. M. de Lima, A. M. da Silva, L. O. da Costa, J. M. Assaf,
G. Jacobs, B. H. Davis, L. V. Mattos and F. B. Noronha,
Appl. Catal., A, 2010, 377, 181.
4. Conclusions
Bimetallic nanoparticles of Ni–Co could be prepared by
reducing LaCoxNi1ꢀxO3 perovskite precursors, as Ni3+ and
Co3+ were simultaneously reduced from perovskite structure,
nanoparticles of Ni–Co alloy were obtained, which were
conrmed by XRD, TEM and TPR techniques. Considering
that ninety percent of metallic elements in the periodic table
can be doped into the perovskite structure, this method for
preparing bimetallic nanoparticles is potential for extensive
application. The resultant Ni–Co alloy nanoparticles sup-
ported on La2O3 showed much high activity and good stability
for steam reforming of ethanol. Aer 10 hours' running at low
reaction temperature, Co-rich catalysts showed certain deac-
tivation due to the carbon deposition. Over the cobalt sites
amorphous carbon was generated while lamentous carbon
was formed over the nickel sites; and amorphous carbon
would result in more severe deactivation. As the stability tests
were conducted at elevated reaction temperature of 700 ꢁC,
bimetallic alloy catalysts presented better anti-sintering ability
than monometal catalysts.
15 Y. Z. Fang, Y. Liu and L. H. Zhang, Appl. Catal., A, 2011, 397,
183.
16 R. Espinal, E. Taboada, E. Molins, R. J. Chimentao,
F. Medina and J. Llorca, RSC Adv., 2012, 2, 2946–2956.
17 L. O. O. da Costa, A. M. da Silva, F. B. Noronha and
L. V. Mattos, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 5930.
18 I. Rossetti, C. Biffi, C. L. Bianchi, V. Nichele, M. Signoretto,
F. Menegazzo, E. Finocchio, G. Ramis and A. Di Michele,
Appl. Catal., B, 2012, 117, 384.
19 S. R. Li, M. S. Li, C. X. Zhang, S. P. Wang, X. B. Ma and
J. L. Gong, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 2940.
20 I. Rossetti, J. Lasso, E. Finocchio, G. Ramis, V. Nichele,
M. Signoretto and A. Di Michele, Appl. Catal., A, 2014, 477,
42.
21 M. S. Batista, R. K. S. Santos, E. M. Assaf, J. M. Assaf and
E. A. Ticianelli, J. Power Sources, 2003, 124, 99.
22 G. S. Gallego, C. Batiot-Dupeyrat, J. Barrault, E. Florez and
F. Mondragon, Appl. Catal., A, 2008, 334, 251.
23 H. Woo, R. Srinivasan, L. Rice, R. De Angelis and P. Reucro,
J. Mol. Catal., 1990, 59, 83.
Acknowledgements
The nancial support of this work by National Natural Science
Foundation of China (no. 21263011 and 21376170) are grate-
fully acknowledged.
24 K. Takanabe, K. Nagaoka, K. Nariai and K. Aika, J. Catal.,
2005, 232, 268.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015
RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 16837–16846 | 16845