10.1002/anie.202002748
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
Szabó, E.; Sarkadi, B. Biomark. Med. 2013, 7, 803–819. g) Shy, A. N.;
Kim, B. J.; Xu, B. Matter 2019, 1 , 1127–1147.
assemblies do not readily enter HT-1080 (CA IX+) cells or MDA-
MB-231 (ALP+) cells when they were cultured separately, we
observed a significant accumulation in HT-1080 (CA IX+) cells
when they are cocultured with MDA-MB-231 (ALP+) (Figure 5b,c).
These experiments show that the cell surface ALP in the latter cell
line processes the nanogels to be taken up by the former cells
after binding to the carbonic anhydrase.
[3]. a) Maeda, H. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 91, 3–6. b) Battistella, C.;
Callmann, C. E.; Thompson, M. P.; Yao, S.; Yeldandi, A. V.; Hayashi, T.;
Carson, D. A.; Gianneschi, N. C. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2019, 1901105. c)
Byrne, J. D.; Betancourt, T.; Brannon-Peppas, L. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
2008, 60, 1615–1626. d) Bae, Y. H.; Park, K. J. Control. release 2011,
153, 198. e) Long, M. J. C.; Poganik, J. R.; Aye, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2016, 138, 3610–3622. f) A. B. Chinen, C. M. Guan, J. R. Ferrer, S. N.
Barnaby, T. J. Merkel, C. A. Mirkin, Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 10530–10574.
g) M. Elsabahy, G. S. Heo, S. Lim, G. Sun, K. L. Wooley, Chem. Rev.
2015, 115, 10967−11011. h) A. R. Maity, D. Stepensky, Mol. Pharm. 2015,
13, 1–7. i) M. W. Tibbitt, J. E. Dahlman, R. Langer, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2016, 138, 704−717.
[4]. a) Shi, J.; Xiao, Z.; Kamaly, N. Farokhzad, O.C. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011,
44, 1123-1134. b) Cheng, Y.; Morshed, R.A.; Auffinger B.; Tobias, A.L.
Lesniak, M.S. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 66, 42-57. c) Byrne, J.D.;
Betancourt, T.; Brannon-Peppas, L. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008, 60,
1615-1626. d) Low, P.S. Henne W.A.; Doorneweerd, D.D., Acc. Chem.
Res. 2008, 41, 120-129. e) Feng, Z. Q. Q.; Wang, H. M.; Wang, S. Y.;
Zhang, Q.; Zhang, X. X.; Rodal, A.; Xu, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140,
9566-9573
[5]. a) de Silva, A. P.; Uchiyama, S. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 399–410. b)
Margulies, D.; Melman, G.; Felder, C. E.; Arad-Yellin, R.; Shanzer, A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15400–15401. c) Erbas-Cakmak, S.; Akkaya,
E. U. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 11364–11368. d) De Silva, P. A.;
Gunaratne, N. H. Q.; McCoy, C. P. Nature 1993, 364, 42–44. e) Gao, J.;
Liu, X.; Secinti, H.; Jiang, Z.; Munkhbat, O.; Xu, Y.; Guo, X.;
Thayumanavan, S. Chem. - A Eur. J. 2018, 24, 1789–1794.
[6]. a) Ellison, D.; Mugler, A.; Brennan, M. D.; Lee, S. H.; Huebner, R. J.;
Shamir, E. R.; Woo, L. A.; Kim, J.; Amar, P.; Nemenman, I.; et al. PNAS,
2016, 113, E679–E688. b) Lawrence, T. S.; Beers, W. H.; Gilula, N. B.
Nature 1978, 272, 501–506. c) Perbal, B. Cell Commun Signal, 2003, 1,
3.
In summary, we have demonstrated a set of cellular logic gates
that exhibit efficient uptake of polymeric nanoassemblies in
specific cells. The polymeric system contains a functional
hydrophilic terminus based on a caged carbonic anhydrase-
specific ligand, which can be unmasked with an ALP-catalyzed
cleavage of an aryl phosphate group and a subsequent self-
immolation reaction. Such a design offers to exhibit cellular AND
gates in unicellular and bicellular settings. We show that these
nanoassemblies are taken up efficiently and selectively by Saos-
2 cells in single cell cultures, because this is the only cell line
overexpresses both the unmasking enzyme ALP and the receptor
protein CA IX, among the four cells tested. The same concept was
then tested in a two-cell co-culture, where one cell overexpresses
ALP (MDA-MB-231) and the other overexpresses CA IX (HT-
1080). Here, only in the co-culture does the latter cell exhibits
higher degree of uptake of the nanoassembly, because the former
cell was able to unmask the ligand from the nanoassembly. The
design insights and the concept of cellular AND gates provided
here will find use in many applications where specificity in
targeting is critical, because an AND-gate requires the concurrent
presence of two different cell surface markers. Since proteins are
arguably the most prominent pathological biomarkers, these dual
protein-based cellular AND gate uptake of polymeric
nanoassemblies would open up new possibilities for tumor
imaging, diagnostics and targeted delivery.
[7]. a) Rao, S. R.; Snaith, A. E.; Marino, D.; Cheng, X.; Lwin, S. T.; Orriss, I.
R.; Hamdy, F. C.; Edwards, C. M. Br. J. Cancer 2017, 116, 227–236. b)
Fishman, W. H.; Inglis, N. R.; Green, S.; Anstiss, C. L.; Gosh, N. K.; Reif,
A. E.; Rustigian, R.; Krant, M. J.; Stolbach, L. L. Nature 1968, 219, 697,
[8]. Krishnamurthy, V. M.; Kaufman, G. K.; Urbach, A. R.; Gitlin, I.; Gudiksen,
K. L.; Weibel, D. B.; Whitesides, G. M. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 946–1051.
[9]. H. N. Li, Y. X. Ci, Anal. Chim. Acta 1995, 317, 353–357.
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Science Foundation (CHE-1307118) for
supporting this work. The microscopy data was gathered in the
Light Microscopy Facility and Nikon Center of Excellence at the
Institute for Applied Life Sciences, UMass Amherst with support
from the Massachusetts Life Sciences Center. We thank Dr. Amy
S. Burnside for help with Flow Cytometry data analysis.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Keywords: AND gate • Targeting • Cellular uptake • Enzyme-
responsive polymeric nanoassembly
[1]. Mittelbrunn, M.; Sánchez-Madrid, F. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
2012, 13, 328.
[2]. a) Seo, J.; Kim, S.; Park, H. H.; Choi, D. Y.; Nam, J. M. Nano- Sci. Adv.
2019, 5, 1–14. b) Callmann, C. E.; Barback, C. V.; Thompson, M. P.; Hall,
D. J.; Mattrey, R. F.; Gianneschi, N. C. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 4611–4615.
c) Long, M. J. C.; Poganik, J. R.; Aye, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138 ,
3610–3622. d) Wu, L.; Qu, X. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2963–2997. e)
Liu, H. W.; Chen, L.; Xu, C.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X. B.; Tan, W. Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2018, 21, 7140–7180. f) Várady, G.; Cserepes, J.; Németh, A.;
4
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.