Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
10.1002/ejoc.201900921
European Journal of Organic Chemistry
FULL PAPER
A set of aminoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxamides 8a‒8c
(R1 = H (a), 4-Me (b), 5-Me (c)) were thus generated as model
substrates (Scheme 1). Following a desilylative Strecker‒Ugi type
multicomponent reaction, the 2-aminopyridine 9a was reacted
with ethylglyoxalate 10 in the presence of TMSCN and 1,4-
diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) under microwave irradiation
(120 °C) to give 11a in moderate yield (60%).[5g,12a] 8a was
afforded by subsequent reaction with aqueous ammonia at 70 °C
for 48 h (81%). Compounds 8b and 8c were prepared otherwise
according to a Tschitschibabin type condensation protocol.[9b]
Aminopyridines 9b and 9c were therefore converted into
imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-2-carboxylates 12b (50%) and 12c (60%)
respectively, by refluxing in EtOH (route a) or MeOH (route b) with
ethyl bromopyruvate 13. The regioselective nitrations (e.g.,
H2SO4/HNO3) of 12b‒c were then performed at 0 °C to provide
the mono-nitro products 14b‒c in good yields (81 vs. 70%). Next,
the nitroesters 14b‒c were stirred in a mixture of aqueous
ammonia and THF at room temperature, to provide nitroamides
15b‒c in excellent yields (90 and 91%). Reductions of 15b‒c to
the corresponding aminoamides 8b‒c were achieved by catalytic
hydrogenation (10% Pd‒C, rt, route c), or treatment with Tin(II)
chloride in EtOH at 100 °C under μW irradiation (route d).[9b] From
the pyridine-carboxamide intermediates 8a‒8c, annulation and
chlorination reactions were then carried out by heating at 160 °C
with CF3(CO)NH2 used as solvent (24 h) and treatment with an
excess of SOCl2 under reflux (1.5 h). The 2-
(trifluoromethyl)pyrido[1,2-e]purin-4-ol derivatives 16a‒16c (58-
73%) and 4-chloro-2-(trifluoromethyl)pyrido[1,2-e]purines 17a‒
17c were obtained in moderate to good yields (i.e., 60-77%).
With compounds 17a‒17c in hands, we decided to investigate
further post-modification of the pyrimidine substitution pattern.
Easy post-decoration of 4-chloro-pyrido[1,2-e]purines through
nucleophilic substitutions with (aryl)- amines, alcohols and thiol
reagents has already been described;[5g,12a] but to the best of our
knowledge, there is no mention of their transition-metal catalyzed
cross-coupling reactions with C-Nu.
The Suzuki−Miyaura reaction is a cornerstone of modern
organic synthesis. Unlike many cross-coupling strategies, it is a
routine, versatile and benign reaction that is cost-effective,
scalable and maybe amenable to green chemistry principles and
industrial standards.[22] It was successfully applied to many
different coupling partners, including nitrogen-containing
heterocycles using catalytic amount of palladium(II) acetate (0.1
eq.), Xantphos (0.2 eq.) as ligand and potassium carbonate (2
equiv.) as base in toluene at elevated temperature. In addition,
conventional thermal heating could be replaced by microwave
irradiation in a sealed reactor with major improvement in terms of
yields and reaction times.[23] These conditions were thus tested
with p-tolylboronic acid and chloropurine 17a as model substrate
to give 18a in good yield (85%) after 50 min of reaction at 100 °C
(Table 1, entry 1). Triphenyl phosphine, and BINAP,[24] together
with Xantphos,[25] have become the most often used ligands for
palladium-catalyzed carbon‒carbon and the more challenging
carbon‒nitrogen bond-forming reactions.[26,27] Thus, subsequent
cross-coupling reactions were next conducted with PPh3 and
BINAP, but a disappointing yield decrease was noticed (entries 2-
tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) through insertion of
Pd(OAc)2 and PPh3 (entry 2) vs. direct addition of Pd(PPh3)4
(entry 4) did not produce any variation of the reaction yield (ca.
80%). When the influence of the solvent was assessed (H2O,
H2O/DME, 1,4-dioxane), slight to dramatic decrease of the
catalytic efficiency was noted (entries 5-7). It was also the case
when Cs2CO3 was replaced by K2CO3 as base (entry 8). Finally,
reaction temperature was increased to 120 °C to give a
satisfactory 84% yield after a period of reaction of 30 min (entry
9). Interestingly, there was no cross-coupling reaction without a
catalyst (entry 10), which excludes an addition/elimination
pathway.
Table 1. Optimization of the conditions for the Suzuki‒Miyaura coupling
reaction of p-tolylboronic acid and compound 17a.[a]
Entry
Catalyst
Ligand
Solvent
Yield (%)
of 18a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(PPh3)4
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Xantphos
PPh3
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
H2O
85
80
BINAP
‒
60
79
Xantphos
Xantphos
Xantphos
Xantphos
Xantphos
‒
50
H2O/DME
1,4-dioxane
toluene
toluene
toluene
40
70
77[b]
84[c]
traces
[a] Typical reaction conditions: Ar atmosphere, compound 17a (1 eq.), p-
tolylboronic acid (1.5 eq.), K2CO3 (2 eq.) as base, catalyst (0.1 eq.),
additional ligand (0.2 eq.), heating at 100 °C under microwave irradiation for
50 min in a sealed reactor. [b] Cs2CO3 (2 eq.) instead of K2CO3 (2 eq.) were
added. [c] Heating was performed at 120 °C for 30 min.
The scope of the reaction was then explored using various
organoboronic acids under the optimized aforementioned
conditions (entry 9). As depicted in Scheme 2, yields obtained
were good for most products (e.g., 65-85%). It is worth noting that
a better reactivity was observed for boronic acids substituted with
a methyl or an electron-withdrawing group. The outcomes were
also indicative of the influence of the substituent position on the
reactivity of the boronic acid. Comparing the same moiety, the p-
3).
Of
note,
in
situ
generation
of
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.