Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 151 ͑7͒ C508-C513 ͑2004͒
C513
3. M. L. Rudnitskii, V. B. Freidlin, V. N. Devyatkin, A. E. Stolina, and V. L. Rud-
nitskaya, Tsvetnye Met., 1, 53 ͑1976͒.
4. G. N. Kannan, S. Srikantan, K. S. Dandapani, and P. S. Desikan, Bull. Electro-
chem., 3, 671 ͑1987͒.
5. Y. Zhang and L. Luo, J. Cent-South Inst. Min. Metall., 22, 529 ͑1991͒.
6. B. Yang, Y. Yu, Z. Wang, and Z. Qiu, Dongbei Daxue Xuebao, Ziran Kexueban, 21,
524 ͑2000͒.
7. P. V. Polyakov, A. M. Orlov, and A. N. Tatakin, Tekhnol. Mater. Elektron. Tekh.,
1970, 120.
8. S. Duan, Abstract 483, p. 719, The Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol.
85-2, Las Vegas, NV, Oct 13-18, 1985.
9. G. M. Rao, J. Appl. Electrochem., 16, 775 ͑1986͒.
10. G. M. Rao, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 249, 191 ͑1988͒.
11. L. Wu and Y. Wang, J. Cent-South Inst. Min. Metall., 21, 103 ͑1990͒.
12. S. Furihata, K. Akashi, and S. Kurosawa, Electrochim. Acta, 26, 1107 ͑1981͒.
13. R. Tunold, Light Metals, 1, 949 ͑1980͒.
14. T. Støre, G. M. Haarberg, and R. Tunold, J. Appl. Electrochem., 30, 1351 ͑2000͒.
15. A. Kisza, J. Kazmierczak, B. Børresen, G. M. Haarberg, and R. Tunold, J. Appl.
Electrochem., 25, 940 ͑1995͒.
16. Y. Zhang and L. Luo, J. Cent-South Inst. Min. Metall., 25, 176 ͑1994͒.
17. N. A. Frantas’ev and K. D. Muzhzhzvlev, Tsvetnye Met., 16, 56 ͑1973͒.
18. A. Komura, H. Imanaga, and N. Watanabe, Denki Kagaku oyobi Kogyo Butsuri
Kagaku, 40, 762 ͑1972͒.
19. A. Komura, H. Imanaga, and N. Watanabe, Kogyo Kagaku Zasshi, 73, 892 ͑1970͒.
20. B. Børresen, G. M. Haarberg, and R. Tunold, Electrochim. Acta, 42, 1613 ͑1997͒.
21. B. Børresen, G. M. Haarberg, R. Tunold, G. Voyiatzis, and G. N. Papateodorou, in
Proceedings of the Jondal 2000 International Symposium, C. Rosenkilde, Editor,
Norsk Hydro ASA, Norway ͑2000͒.
calculation of the diffusion coefficient of electroactive species by
convolution of the voltammetric curves.
Mg-Ca alloy formation leads to an important UPD of calcium,
which affects the electrodeposition of magnesium.
In a melt of industrial composition, a remarkable phenomenon
was observed. This was related to the formation of a passivating
MgO layer on top of the already deposited metallic magnesium, or
alternatively, to the precipitation of solid KCl•CaCl2 at some points
on the electrode surface.
From the obtained results one could give some recommendations
about the most appropriate solvent and cathode material of the ones
studied for electrolytic production of magnesium. When it comes to
substrates, glassy carbon does not seem to be a good choice due to
formation of intermetallic compounds with the cations present in
any of the studied molten chlorides. Tungsten and molybdenum
could very well be used because both of them have a similar behav-
ior and possess good wetting properties.
Moreover, the obtained results showed that in the studied cal-
cium chloride-based melts it is better to avoid the presence of KCl
due to the existing passivation phenomena. CaCl2-NaCl-MgCl2 and
CaCl2-MgCl2 mixtures possess similar characteristics. However,
when dealing with industrial processes there are some other aspects
one should consider in order to choose the proper solvent, i.e., con-
ductivity, density, working temperature, availability of raw materi-
als, and cost.
22. P. V. Polyakov, O. A. Lebedev, and G. A. Kotel’nikova, Zh. Prikl. Khim. (S.-
Peterburg), 46, 1365 ͑1973͒.
23. G. M. Rao, J. Appl. Electrochem., 16, 626 ͑1986͒.
´
24. Y. Castrillejo, A. M. Martınez, G. M. Haarberg, B. Børresen, K. S. Osen, and R.
Tunold, Electrochim. Acta, 42, 1489 ͑1997͒.
25. M. A. Bredig, in Molten Salt Chemistry, M. Blander, Editor, p. 394, John Wiley &
Sons, New York ͑1969͒.
Acknowledgments
The Research Council of Norway and Norsk Hydro ASA are
acknowledged for financial support. A.M.M. also thanks the ‘‘Sec-
retarıa de Educacion, Universidades, Investigacion y Desarrollo’’
͑Spain͒ for a postdoctoral grant. Oddmund Wallevik and Dr. Chris-
tian Rosenkilde, Norsk Hydro ASA, are acknowledged for fruitful
discussions.
26. B. Scharifker and G. J. Hills, Electrochim. Acta, 28, 879 ͑1983͒.
27. Southampton Electrochemistry Group, in Instrumental Methods in Electrochemis-
try, Ellis Horwood Series, England ͑1985͒.
´
´
´
´
28. Y. Castrillejo, A. M. Martınez, R. Pardo, and G. M. Haarberg, Electrochim. Acta
42, 1869 ͑1997͒.
29. Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd ed., T. B. Massalski, Editor, Materials Park, OH
͑1990͒.
30. P. Bocage, D. Ferry, and G. Picard, Electrochim. Acta 36, 155 ͑1991͒.
31. Thermochemical computer program FACTWin 3.05, Thermafact, Ltd., Montreal,
Canada.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology assisted in meeting the
publication costs of this article.
˚
32. A. Anundskas, K. Grjotheim, A. H. Schultz, H. Svendsen, and H. A. Øye, Light
References
Metals, 1, 513 ͑1977͒.
´
´
2. Kh. L. Strelets, in Electrolytic Production of Magnesium, trans. by J. Schmorak,
Keterpress Enterprises, Jerusalem, Israel ͑1977͒.
33. E. Gomez, R. Pollina, and E. Valles, J. Electroanal. Chem. 397, 111 ͑1995͒.
34. S. Boghosian, Aa. Godø, H. Mediaas, W. Ravlo, and T. Østvold, Acta Chem. Scand.
45, 145 ͑1991͒.
Downloaded on 2015-01-03 to IP 130.88.90.140 address. Redistribution subject to ECS terms of use (see ecsdl.org/site/terms_use) unless CC License in place (see abstract).