M. Zawadzki / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 439 (2007) 312–320
319
4. Conclusions
The proposed microwave-assisted solvothermal method is
very rapid and effective for the preparation of polymer stabilized
Pd nanoparticles with controllable sizes from 1.6 to 15 nm as
well as single-phase zinc aluminate of particles with an average
size ∼2.1 nm and narrow size distribution as were confirmed
by powder X-ray diffraction and electron microscopy studies.
The morphology (shape and particle size) of Pd nanoparticles is
greatly affected by the concentration of the stabilizing polymer
and Pd precursor salt. The nature of reducing agents (EG,
DEG and TEG) used was of less significance under microwave
solvothermal conditions of fixed parameters (temperature,
pressure and time). Liquid nitrogen adsorption–desorption
measurements revealed that nanocrystalline ZnAl2O4 exhibits
interesting textural properties like high specific surface area (up
to 210 m2/g) and microporous structure with an average pore
size about 1.1 nm. After heat treatment at 500 ◦C, some increase
in the degree of crystallinity and a shift of pore size distribution
towards mesoporous region was observed. Such properties
make it a promising material for use in the development of
catalyst carriers. Pd colloid nanoparticles supported on zinc
aluminate spinel was found to be more active in iso-butane com-
bustion than corresponding system prepared by conventional
impregnation method. This indicates that nanostructured Pd
colloid and porous ZnAl2O4 prepared under microwave assisted
solvothermal conditions are very promising catalyst precursors.
Fig. 11. Combustion of iso-butene over 0.5 wt% Pd/ZnAl2O4 systems obtained
from pre-prepared Pd nanoparticles and by impregnation method.
suggests that no recrystallization of the dispersed ZnAl2O4
spinel occurs at temperature up to 900 ◦C.
3.3. Pd/ZnAl2O4 system
The catalytic activity of PVP stabilized palladium colloid
supported on porous high surface area zinc aluminate, both
prepared by using microwave solvothermal processing route,
was evaluated in total oxidation of iso-butane in comparison
with Pd/ZnAl2O4 system obtained by conventional impregna-
tion method. The catalytic activities of both systems were inves-
tigated at a temperature of 50–250 ◦C and compared in terms
of their light-off temperatures corresponding to 50% conver-
sion. Fig. 11 presents typical iso-butene conversion curves as a
function of increasing reaction temperature (2 ◦C/min). Conver-
sion started at 90 ◦C and 110 ◦C, respectively, for the “colloid”
and “impregnated” catalyst, and increased more or less rapidly
with the increasing reaction temperature. Conversions of 100%
could be obtained above 170 and 210 ◦C, respectively. It should
be stated that both catalyst showed relatively high activity but
reaction temperature over “colloid” catalyst was always lower
by at least 20 ◦C for 50% conversion than over convention-
ally prepared catalyst. This indicates that ZnAl2O4 obtained by
microwave hydrothermal method is promising catalyst support
material in both cases. However, probably due to the high surface
area of support as well as the high dispersion of polymer stabi-
lized nanoparticles, the temperatures of 50 and 100% conversion
were noticeable lower for the catalyst prepared from colloid
nanoparticles. It is well known that the surface of the support
on the molecular scale, and therefore that surrounding the active
metal sites, is not well defined so it is usually difficult to obtain,
by conventional impregnation method, monodispersed metals
because the interaction of the individual metal atoms is high
compared with the interaction between the reduced metal and
the support. Additionally, active sites formed by conventional
methods can be significantly contaminated with the support.
References
[1] G. Schmid, Clusters and Colloids, VCH, Weinheim, 1994.
[2] S. Sugano, Microcluster Physics, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1991.
[3] W. Yu, H. Liu, X. An, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 129 (1998) L9.
[4] T.S. Armadi, Z.L. Wang, T.C. Green, A. Henglein, M.A. El-Sayed, Science
272 (1996) 272.
[5] L.G. Pratibha, R. Roper, M.G. White, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 6
(2002) 401.
[6] R.D. Gonzales, H. Miura, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 36 (1) (1994) 145.
[7] G. Ertl, H. Kno¨zinger, J. Weitkamp (Eds.), Handbook of Heterogeneous
Catalysis, VCH, Weinheim, 1997.
[8] H. Bo¨nnemann, G. Braun, W. Brijoux, R. Brinkmann, A. Schulze Tilling,
K. Seevogel, K. Siepen, J. Org. Chem. 520 (1–2) (1996) 143.
[9] W.R. Moser (Ed.), Advanced Catalyst and Nanostructured Materials, Aca-
demic Press, San Diego, 1996.
[10] A. Miyazaki, I. Balint, K. Aika, Y. Nakano, J. Catal. 204 (2001) 364.
[11] H. Bo¨nnemann, K.S. Nagabhushana, J. New Mater. Electrochem. Syst. 7
(2) (2004) 93.
[12] T. Teranishi, H. Hori, M. Miyake, J. Phys. Chem. B 101 (1997) 5774.
[13] S. Chen, K. Huang, J.A. Stearns, Chem. Mater. 12 (2000) 540.
[14] X. Yan, H. Liu, K.Y. Liew, J. Mater. Chem. 11 (2001) 3387.
[15] W. Tu, H. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. 10 (2000) 2207.
[16] S. Komarneni, Curr. Sci. 85 (12) (2003) 1730.
[17] F. Gao, Q.Y. Lu, S. Komarneni, Chem. Mater. 17 (4) (2005) 856.
[18] A.V. Murugan, B.B. Kale, A.V. Kulkarni, L.B. Kunde, V. Saaminathan, J.
Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 16 (2) (2005) 295.
[19] C.R. Patra, G. Alexandra, S. Patra, D.S. Jacob, A. Gedanken, A. Landau,
Y. Gofer, New J. Chem. 29 (5) (2005) 733.
[20] A. Largeteau, S. Oree, C. Marzat, G. Demazeau, High Pressure Res. 20
(1–6) (2001) 281.
[21] Y.B. Khollam, S.B. Deshpande, P.K. Khanna, P.A. Joy, H.S. Potdar, Mater.
Lett. 58 (2004) 2521.