Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 153 ͑10͒ A1805-A1811 ͑2006͒
A1811
2
uted to a wide distribution of barrier heights and widths at sp sites.
A larger degree of graphitization ͑e.g., due to different heat-
treatment or a different substrate͒ can bring about weaker tempera-
terials prepared in the present study: LiFePO -citrate, LiFePO -
4 4
citrate + gelatine, and SiO -naproxene. Interestingly, this is the
2
same range as previously reported for various LiFePO - based ma-
4
3
0
ture dependence and, hence, a smaller average slope. This means
that most differences in the observed curves can be explained by the
slightly different degree of graphitization of these samples. Having
this in mind, we find it quite remarkable that the difference between
the highest ͑0.13 eV͒ and the lowest ͑0.04 eV͒ activation energy
observed for these systems is relatively small. In any case, this brief
analysis and comparison with literature data indicates, with a high
probability, that the electron conduction in all these systems is pri-
marily determined by the carbon phase and is essentially indepen-
dent of the substrate and even of the precursor type. Although such
a conclusion might seem quite obvious in the present context, it
should be reminded that authors often seek for alternative explana-
tions. As mentioned in the introduction, the best-known example is
terials in which, however, the conduction was attributed to noncar-
4
,5
bon phases.
Acknowledgments
Financial support from The Ministry of Higher Education, Sci-
ence, and Technology of the Republic of Slovenia is gratefully ac-
knowledged. Support from the European Network of Excellence
‘
ALISTORE’ network is also acknowledged.
National Institute of Chemistry assisted in meeting the publication costs
of this article.
References
1. J. Molenda, A. Stoklosa, and T. Bak, Solid State Ionics, 36, 53 ͑1989͒.
4
12
2
3
. Y. Shimakawas, T. Numata, and J. Tabuchi, J. Solid State Chem., 131, 138 ͑1997͒.
. H. Kawaia, M. Nagatab, H. Kageyamac, H. Tukamoto, and A. R. West, Electro-
chim. Acta, 45, 315 ͑1999͒.
the dispute between Chung et al. and Ravet et al. about the nature
of electron conduction in doped LiFePO materials. Comparing the
4
4
present data with those published by Chung et al., one may find it
4
. S. Chung, J. T. Bloking, and Y.-M. Chiang, Nat. Mater., 1, 123 ͑2002͒.
very indicative that the activation energies for the materials prepared
by Chung et al. ͑0.062–0.075 eV, see Ref. 4͒ lie in the middle of the
range determined for the present materials ͑0.04–0.13 eV͒ and that
the room temperature values are of the same order of magnitude
5. P. S. Herle, B. Ellis, N. Coombs, and L. F. Nazar, Nat. Mater., 3, 147 ͑2004͒.
6
. N. Ravet, J. B. Goodenough, S. Besner, M. Simoneau, P. Hovington, and
M. Armand, Abstract 127, The Electrochemical Society and the Electrochemical
Society of Japan Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 99–2, Honolulu, HI, Oct. 17–22, 1999.
7. H. Huang, S. C. Yin, and L. F. Nazar, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 4, A170
2001͒.
8. Z. H. Chen and J. R. Dahn, J. Electrochem. Soc., 149, A1184 ͑2002͒.
−
1
͑
͑
0.01 S cm ͒. The values of activation energies determined by
5
Herle et al. for various iron phosphates ͑0.03–04 eV͒ are also simi-
lar to the ones determined in Fig. 11. Of course, a mere comparison
of activation energies is insufficient for reliable determination of a
conduction mechanism. However, given the present results and their
comparison with literature data, one should consider the possibility
that in all these materials, which may contain various interesting
phases, the phase which determines the overall conductivity is al-
ways the carbon phase.
9
. R. Dominko, M. Bele, M. Gaberscek, M. Remskar, D. Hanzel, S. Pejovnik, and J.
Jamnik, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, A607 ͑2005͒.
10. M. Gaberscek, R. Dominko, M. Bele, and J. Jamnik, in NewTtrends in Intercalation
Compounds for Energy Storage and Conversion, K. Zaghib, C. M. Julien, and J.
Prakash, Editors, PV 2003-20, pp. 309–315, The Electrochemical Society, Proceed-
ings Series, Pennington, N.J. ͑2003͒.
11. M. Gaberscek and J. Jamnik, Accepted for publication in Solid State Ionics ͑special
issue of 14th SSI Meeting in Baden Baden, Germany͒.
1
2. N. Ravet, A. Abouimrane, and M. Armand, Nat. Mater., 2, 702 ͑2003͒.
1
3. S. T. Yang, N. H. Zhao, H. Y. Dong, J. X. Yang, and H. Y. Hue, Electrochim. Acta,
5
1, 166 ͑2005͒.
Conclusions
14. R. Dominko, J. M. Goupil, M. Bele, M. Gaberscek, M. Remskar, D. Hanzel, and J.
Jamnik, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, A858 ͑2005͒.
15. M. Gaberscek, R. Dominko, M. Bele, M. Remskar, D. Hanzel, and J. Jamnik, Solid
State Ionics, 176, 1801 ͑2005͒.
6. I. L. Spain, Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, P. L. Walker, Jr., and P. A. Thrower,
Editors, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York ͑1981͒.
7. H. Zhang and J. F. Banfield, Am. Mineral., 84, 528 ͑1999͒.
8. J. M. G. Amores, V. S. Escribano, and G. Busca, J. Mater. Chem., 5, 1245 ͑1995͒.
19. M. Inagaki, H. Miura, and H. Konno, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 18, 1011 ͑1998͒.
0. T. Tsumura, N. Kojitani, I. Izumi, N. Iwashita, M. Toyoda, and M. Inagaki, J.
Heat-treatment of citric acid in the presence of TiO substrate
2
particle leads to relatively low carbon yields ͑typically 3.4 ± 0.5%
after 10 h of heating at 900°C in Ar atmosphere͒. This relatively
low yield is quite suitable for battery purposes where a compromise
between the content of inactive material and the total conductivity is
required. In any case, the yield can be increased up to 10%, if the
initial heating rate is decreased from 10 to 1°C. Between 500 and
1
1
1
2
2
Mater. Chem., 12, 1391 ͑2002͒.
1. B. Tryba, T. Tsumura, M. Janus, A. W. Morawski, and M. Inagaki, Appl. Catal., B,
50, 177 ͑2004͒.
8
00°C the yield is independent of the heating temperature, but at
higher temperatures it starts to decrease. Various mechanisms for
this behavior are proposed. Above ca. 2 wt % the carbon phase
forms more or less homogeneous coatings around the substrate par-
ticles, such as those observed in our previous work on olivines.
Conductivity as a function of carbon content exhibits a typical per-
22. T. Tsumura, N. Kojitani, H. Umemura, M. Toyoda, and M. Inagaki, Appl. Surf. Sci.,
96, 429 ͑2002͒.
23. M. Inagaki, Y. Hirose, T. Matsunaga, T. Tsumura, and M. Toyoda, Carbon, 41,
619 ͑2003͒.
1
9
2
24. K. Kinoshita, Carbon: Electrochemical and Physicochemical Properties, John
Wiley & Sons, New York ͑1988͒.
25. B.-S. Jeong, D. P. Norton, and J. D. Budai, Solid-State Electron., 47, 2275 ͑2003͒.
colation behavior with a percolation threshold of about 1–2 wt %
−
1
and a conductivity plateau within the range of 0.1–1 S cm . De-
creasing the heating rate moderately improves the conductivity at a
given carbon content. To achieve a full conductivity of the carbon-
ized phase, the composite material has to be treated at a temperature
of at least 700°C. The Arrhenius plot for conductivity of the heat-
treated TiO -citric acid sample shows a similar shape and a similar
value for activation energy ͑0.04–0.13 eV͒ as a range of other ma-
2
6. S. Rul, F. Lefevre-Schlick, E. Capria, C. Laurent, and A. Peigney, Acta Mater., 52,
061 ͑2004͒.
1
27. J. K. W. Sandler, J. E. Kirk, I. A. Kinloch, M. S. P. Shaffer, and A. H. Windle,
Polymer, 44, 5893 ͑2003͒.
8. D. McLachlan, J. Electroceram., 5, 93 ͑2000͒.
9. R. O. Grisdale, J. Appl. Phys., 24, 1288 ͑1953͒.
30. M. Koos, S. H. S. Moustafa, E. Szilagyi, and I. Pocsik, Diamond Relat. Mater., 8,
1919 ͑1999͒.
2
2
2
Downloaded on 2012-11-11 to IP 132.236.27.111 address. Redistribution subject to ECS license or copyright; see www.esltbd.org