a
p s s
1540
Po-Yu Chen et al.: The effect of substrate size on characteristics of carbon films
I /I is commonly used to approximately estimate the crys-
D G
References
tallite size of nanographite, and an expression that gives
the crystallite size (L ) from the integrated intensity ratio
[1] A. Grill, Diam. Relat. Mater. 8, 428 (1999).
[2] J. Robertson, Mater. Sci. Eng. R 37, 129 (2002).
[3] S. T. Shiue, H. H. Hsiao, T. Y. Shen, H. C. Lin, and
K. M. Lin, Thin Solid Films 483, 140 (2005).
[4] Y. Liu, C. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. Tzeng, P. Tso, and I. Lin, Diam.
Relat. Mater. 13, 671 (2004).
a
–10
4
–1
I /I is given by [20]: L (nm) = (2.4 × 10 ) λ (I /I ) ,
D
G
a
l
D
G
where λ (in nm units) is the laser line wavelength used in
l
the Raman experiment. This expression indicates that the
crystallite size of nanographite increases with decreasing
I /I value. Hence, Table 2 and Fig. 4 show that I /I de-
[5] O. Brinza, J. Achard, F. Silva, X. Bonnin, P. Barroy, K. De
Corte, and A. Gicquel, Phys. Status Solidi A 205, 2114
(2008).
D
G
D
G
creases from 3.81 to 3.43 as the glass-plate width increases
from 3 mm to 24 mm, while L increases from 10.1 nm to
a
[6] H. Calvo del Castillo, J. L. Ruvalcaba, E. Belmont, T. Cal-
derón, R. Meléndrez, and M. Barboza-Flores, Phys. Status
Solidi A 205, 2221 (2008).
11.2 nm. Notably, the CH bonds in the region around
–1
3000 cm are not observed by Raman scattering and/or in-
frared spectroscopy.
[7] G. Fanchini, A. Tagliaferro, B. Popescu, and E. A. Davis,
J. Non-Cryst. Solids 299–302, 846 (2002).
The sheet resistance of carbon coatings can be obtained
by FPP measurements. The electrical resistivity is the
product of the sheet resistance and thickness [21], which
only depends on the structure of carbon films. Thus, the
electrical resistivity is adopted to evaluate the electrical
property of carbon films. Table 1 shows that the electrical
resistivities of carbon films are 21.8 Ω μm, 19.5 Ω μm,
17.8 Ω μm, and 16.3 Ω μm for glass-plate widths of 3 mm,
6 mm, 12 mm, and 24 mm, respectively, indicating that the
electrical resistivity of carbon films decreases as the glass-
[8] N. D. Baydoğan, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 107, 70 (2004).
[9] M. J. Paterson, Diam. Relat. Mater. 7, 908 (1998).
[10] S. S. Chen, S. T. Shiue, Y. H. Wu, and K. J. Cheng, Surf.
Coat. Technol. 202, 798 (2007).
[11] J. Z. Hu and K. J. Huttinger, Carbon 41, 1501 (2003).
[12] H. Nakayama, K. Takatsuji, S. Moriwaki, K. Murakami,
K. Mizoguchi, and M. Nakayama, Thin Solid Films 430,
309 (2003).
[13] C. A. Taylor, M. F. Wayne, and W. K. S. Chiu, Surf. Coat.
Technol. 182, 131 (2004).
plate width increases. The RS results indicate that L in-
a
[14] W. N. Li, Y. S. Ding, S. L. Suib, J. F. DiCarlo, and
F. S. Galasso, Surf. Coat. Technol. 190, 366 (2005).
[15] Y. S. Ding, W. N. Li, S. Iaconetti, X. F. Shen, J. DiCarlo,
F. S. Galasso, and S. L. Suib, Surf. Coat. Technol. 200,
3041 (2006).
creases as the glass-plate width increases. The increase of
L results in a decrease of the grain boundaries, and thus
a
causes a decrease of the electrical resistivity [22, 23]. Be-
sides, the decrease of the electrical resistivity also results
from the decrease of particles on the carbon film surface.
The laminar structure of carbon films is disturbed by the
particles, so the electrical resistivity of carbon films should
decrease if the number and size of particles on carbon film
surfaces decrease.
[16] X. Bourrat, J. Lavenac, F. Langlais, and R. Naslain, Carbon
39, 2376 (2001).
[17] A. C. Ferrari and J. Robertson, Phys. Rev. B 61, 14095
(2000).
[18] E. Tomasella, C. Meunier, and S. Mikhailov, Surf. Coat.
Technol. 141, 286 (2001).
4 Conclusions Carbon films are deposited on glass
plate substrates with different substrate sizes using thermal
CVD. The thickness of carbon films decreases with in-
creasing glass-plate width, indicating that the deposition
rate of carbon coatings decreases on increasing the deposi-
tion area of the glass plate. The number and size of parti-
cles on carbon film surfaces decrease with increasing
glass-plate width. Meanwhile, the structural ordered degree
and crystallite size of carbon films increase with increasing
glass-plate widths, while the surface roughness and electri-
cal resistivity of carbon films decrease.
[19] M. Lejeune, O. Durand-Drouhin, J. Henocque, R. Bouzerar,
A. Zeinert, and M. Benlahsen, Thin Solid Films 389, 233
(2001).
[20] L. G. Cancado, K. Takai, T. Enoki, M. Endo, Y. A. Kim,
H. Mizusaki, A. Jorio, L. N. Coelho, R. Magalhães-Pani-
ago, and M. A. Pimenta, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 163106
(2006).
[21] M. Iwaki, Y. Suzuki, A. Nakao, and H. Watanabe, Nucl.
Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, Beam Interact. Mater. At.
127/128, 208 (1997).
[22] T. H. Fang and W. J. Chang, Appl. Surf. Sci. 220, 175
(2003).
[23] J. H. Son, M. Y. Park, and S. W. Rhee, Thin Solid Films
335, 229 (1998).
Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Na-
tional Science Council, Taiwan, under Grant No. NSC 97-2221-
E-005-027-MY2, and was also supported in part by the Ministry
of Education, Taiwan, under the ATU plan.
© 2009 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim