114108-3
Moody et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 114108 ͑2007͒
initial cesium layer was placed on the dispenser cell and then
heated to 180 °C continuously while QE was measured for
more than 8 days. The 1/e lifetime of the cathode during this
continuous rejuvenation process was increased by roughly an
order of magnitude to more than 47 days. This confirms that
the rejuvenation process can be sustained over extended pe-
riods.
In conclusion, the QE of a Cs-covered sintered tungsten
surface was characterized, and the data were shown to cor-
relate well with a photoemission model. Experiment and
theory agree to within 30%, and the relationship between QE
and cesium surface coverage was used to investigate and
characterize a prototype dispenser photocathode. The dis-
penser surface was cleaned using an argon ion beam and
activated at 470 °C. Subsequent heating at much lower tem-
peratures ͑140–180 °C͒ allowed a controlled release of ce-
sium to the surface that established and maintained a surface
layer optimal for photoemission. The dispenser cell was
shown to deliver cesium to the surface in a temperature con-
trolled manner over long periods of time. The determination
of whether high QE cathodes can be built based on the dis-
penser cell technology and rejuvenated in situ to provide
uniform surface coverage and good QE at operational tem-
peratures will be the subject of a separate work.
FIG. 3. ͑Color online͒ Cesium coverage vs temperature during dispenser
cathode rejuvenation.
225 °C. Activation occurred upon further heating to 470 °C
when cesium chromate reacted with titanium powder, releas-
ing elemental cesium. Most of the elemental cesium was
contained within the cell, but some escaped and accumulated
on chamber walls and contributed to thermionic emission
from the cathode surface. The cell was cooled to room tem-
perature, allowing cesium to remain within the cell and to
accumulate on its surface. QE was measured continuously
for several days until the cesium layer began to degrade,
resulting in a decreased photoyield from 0.11% to 0.06% in
the UV ͑375 nm͒. Upon heating from room temperature, QE
increased as cesium was brought to the surface to repair the
damaged layer, and at 140 °C, QE reached its previous peak
value of 0.11% in the UV. Argon ion cleaning was used to
remove the entire surface layer and return to an atomically
clean tungsten substrate. The dispenser was again slowly
heated to bring cesium to the surface, and the previous in-
crease and peak in QE was again observed. These results
demonstrate that the dispenser cell can deliver cesium to the
surface in a controlled manner at moderate temperatures
͑ഛ150 °C͒.
Relating QE to cesium coverage quantifies the ability of
the dispenser to deliver cesium to the surface. Figure 3
shows coverage as a function of temperature during the re-
juvenation cycle. Note that at 140 °C ͑the temperature at
which QE peaks͒ the coverage is observed to be about 63%.
Coverage does not increase beyond this value because the
elevated temperature causes desorption which prevents fur-
ther accumulation of cesium at the surface. The 1/e lifetime
for a recesiated layer at room temperature was about 5 days.
QE decreases over time because cesium leaves the surface
either through desorption or because of ion back-
bombardment. If the cell is held at an elevated temperature,
however, the cesium layer can be continuously repaired. An
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding provided by
the Joint Technology Office and the Office of Naval Re-
search. The authors have benefited from interactions with
David Dowell ͑SLAC͒, Jonathan Shaw ͑NRL͒, Joan Yater
͑NRL͒, Dinh Nguyen ͑LANL͒, and John Smedley ͑BNL͒.
1P. G. O’Shea and H. P. Freund, Science 292, 1853 ͑2001͒.
2S. H. Kong, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 358, 272 ͑1995͒.
3A. H. Sommer, Photoemissive Materials, 1st ed. ͑Wiley, New York, 1968͒,
Chap. 8, pp. 113–199.
4W. C. Rutledge and E. S. Rittner, J. Appl. Phys. 28, 167 ͑1957͒.
5G. Gärtner, P. Geittner, D. Raasch, and D. U. Wiechert, Appl. Surf. Sci.
146, 22 ͑1999͒.
6R. T. Longo, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 6966 ͑2003͒.
7N. A. Moody, D. W. Feldman, and P. G. O’Shea, J. Directed Energy ͑to be
published͒.
8N. A. Moody, D. W. Feldman, P. G. O’Shea, K. L. Jensen, and A. Balter,
Proceedings of the 27th International Free Electron Laser Conference,
9K. L. Jensen, D. W. Feldman, N. A. Moody, and P. G. O’Shea, J. Appl.
Phys. 99, 124905 ͑2006͒.
10K. L. Jensen, P. G. O’Shea, D. W. Feldman, and N. A. Moody, Appl. Phys.
Lett. 89, 224103 ͑2006͒.
11B. K. Ridley, Quantum Processes in Semiconductors, 4th ed. ͑Clarendon,
Oxford, 1999͒.
12Harald Ibach, and Hans Lüth, Solid State Physics, 2nd Ed. ͑Springer,
Berlin, 1995͒.
13D. K. Wagner and R. Bowers, Adv. Phys. 27, 651 ͑1978͒.
14A. V. Lugovskoy and I. Bray, J. Phys. D 31, L78 ͑1998͒.
15K. L. Jensen, N. A. Moody, D. W. Feldman, P. G. O’Shea, J. E. Yater, and
J. L. Shaw, Proceedings of the 28th International Free Electron Laser
Conference, Berlin, Germany, 2006 ͑unpublished͒, Paper No. THPPH068.
16J. J. Petillo, presented at 48th Annual Meeting of the Division of Plasma
Physics ͑APS͒, Philadelphia, PA, 2006 ͑unpublished͒.
17J. Shaw, J. Yater, K. L. Jensen, P. G. O’Shea, D. W. Feldman, and N. A.
Moody, presented at Ninth Annual Directed Energy Symposium, Albu-
querque, NM, 2006 ͑unpublished͒.
129.22.89.130 On: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 16:46:33