completely homogenous. The particles are highly crystalline
TEM) despite the relatively low temperatures of formation, and
the primary particle sizes are extremely small imparting
(
2
21
relatively high surface areas of up to ca. 180 m g for the
materials. Currently we are exploring the potential of our
technique for synthesising other solid solutions.
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the
EPSRC: Clean Technology Fellowship (M. P.), Grant No. GR/
K76023 (J. A. D.) and ICI (A. C.). We thank Dr M. G. Barker
and his group, Dr A.A. Galkin, Dr D. A. Graham, Dr. P. A.
Hamley, S. J. Barlow and M. Guyler for their assistance and
discussions.
Notes and references
Fig. 3 SBET area measurements (-) and estimated particle sizes by PXD (:)
of the materials vs. zirconium content (%Zr).
†
Zirconium acetate/dilute acetic acid solution with a 15% Zr content as
supplied by Aldrich.
CAUTION: this experiment involves high pressure and temperature and
‡
4
+
requires appropriate apparatus.
Ce ) lattice. For the samples of Ce+Zr ratios 1+4 and 1+9, a
tetragonal phase was assigned.§ For pure ZrO , PXD and
The total concentration of the metal solution (Ce + Zr) was kept constant
and equal to 0.21 M. The flow rates of the metal salt and water streams were
2
Raman data revealed a mixture of monoclinic and tetragonal
phases. Considering the relative intensities of the most intense
reflection in the PXD of both phases, the ratio of monoclinic to
tetragonal phases was estimated to be 40+60.
The precise phase assignment is slightly different from that
reported in the literature.3 One possible explanation is that the
Zr content in the solid solutions is lower than the expected.
21
5
.0 and 10.0 mL min , respectively. Pressure was kept constant at 25 ± 1
MPa and the H O inlet temperature was ca. 360 °C. At the mixing point, the
2
temperature was close to 300 °C. The resulting coloured suspensions of
metal oxides were separated from the clear aqueous phase by decantation,
and the solids were dried at 100 °C after washing with water.
,14
§ Although the characteristic tetragonal splittings of the reflections (200),
(220), (311) and (400) in the fluorite structure (Fig. 2) were not visible
owing to the broadness of the PXD peaks, the appearance of bands at 625,
However, this would not explain why our samples of pure ZrO
2
21
4
60 and 315 cm
in the Raman spectra of the fresh materials (not
contained a mixture of monoclinic and tetragonal phases rather
than the monoclinic (thermodynamically stable) phase reported
in the literature.14 Therefore is likely that the differences are due
to the small particle sizes of the materials produced. Fornasiero
8
illustrated) suggests a tetragonal phase.
1
T. Masui, K. Fujiwara, K. Machida and G. Adachi, Chem. Mater., 1997,
, 2197.
9
3
et al. have reported that below a critical crystalline size, the
2
3
A. Trovarelli, Catal. Rev., 1996, 38, 439.
P. Fornasiero, G. Balducci, R. DiMonte, J. Kaspar, V. Sergo, G.
Gubitosa, A. Ferrero and M. Graziani, J. Catal., 1996, 164, 173.
tetragonal phase is favoured over the monoclinic and, with
extremely small particles, the cubic phase is favoured over the
tetragonal, which is consistent with our phase assignment. As
discussed before, the extremely small particle sizes may be as a
result of the rapid precipitation and relatively low synthesis
temperature. All samples were studied by TGA. In each case,
there was a weight loss (2–12%) at @100 °C, presumably due to
adsorbed water. Some samples showed smaller weight losses
4 G. Vlaic, R. DiMonte, P. Fornasiero, E. Fonda, J. Kaspar and M.
Graziani, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1998, 116, 185.
5
6
7
8
M. Yashima, K. Morimoto, N. Ishizawa and M. Yoshimura, J. Am.
Ceram. Soc., 1993, 76, 1745.
T. Masui, K. Fujiwara, Y. Peng, T. Sakata, K. Machida, H. Mori and G.
Adachi, J. Alloys Compd., 1998, 269, 116.
C. de Leitenberg, A. Trovarelli, F. Zamar, G. Maschio, G. Dolcetti and
J. Llorca, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 2181.
A. Trovarelli, F. Zamar, J. Llorca, C. de Leitenburg, G. Dolcetti and J. T.
Kiss, J. Catal., 1997, 169, 490.
(
4–7%) around 250 and 310 °C; IR spectra suggest that theses
losses may be associated with residual nitrate and acetate.
In conclusion, we have reported a new and extremely rapid
one-step synthesis of ceria–zirconia solid solutions (at the
concentrations and flow rates employed in the experiments,
9 T. Settu and R. Gobinathan, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1994, 67, 1999.
10 T. Masui, Y. Peng, K. Machida and G. Adachi, Chem. Mater., 1998, 10,
4005 and references therein.
2
1
between ca. 8 and 11 g h , depending on the composition of
, can be produced continuously). The chemistry is
1
1
1
1 B. Djurcic, D. McGarry and S. Pickering, J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1993, 12,
320.
2 T. Adschiri, K. Kanazawa and K. Arai, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1992, 75,
019.
3 Y. Hakuta, S. Onai, S. Terayama, T. Adschiri and K. Arai, J. Mater. Sci.
Lett., 1998, 17, 1211.
x 2
Ce12xZr O
1
simple and clean. The reaction does not require the addition of
organic solvents, modifiers (to control pH) or prolonged
reaction times. The temperatures are low (300 °C) compared to
those used in conventional techniques. Most importantly, the
composition of Ce12xZr
amounts of precursors in the starting solution. The products are
1
x
O
2
can be tuned simply by varying the
14 M. Yashima, K. Morimoto, N. Ishizawa and M. Yoshimura, J. Am.
Ceram. Soc., 1993, 76, 2865.
902
Chem. Commun., 2000, 901–902