2826
Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 81, No. 15, 7 October 2002
Nakajima et al.
pressed the formation of the Si oxide interfacial layer. Be-
cause of an extremely uniform thickness control capability in
the ultrathin region and the low thermal budget of the ALD
process, the ZrO2 /Si–nitride stack structure formed by the
ALD process is a promising candidate for the ultrathin gate
dielectrics of sub-0.1-m complementary metal–oxide–
semiconductor transistors.
Part of this work has been supported by a Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research ͑B͒ from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japanese Govern-
ment ͑No. 13450129͒, and the Semiconductor Technology
Academic Research Center ͑STARC͒.
FIG. 6. C–V characteristics at 20 kHz for ALD–ZrO2 /ALD–Si–nitride
capacitor ͑solid lines͒. Number of deposition cycles was 15 and 2 for ZrO2
and Si nitride, respectively. ZTB exposure time was 60 s. H2O vapor pres-
sure was 0.70 kPa. The calculated C–V curve ͑broken line͒ is also shown
using the doping level of the Si substrate and the work function of the Al
gate.
1 Y. Oshita, A. Ogura, A. Hoshino, T. Suzuki, S. Hiiro, and H. Machida, J.
Cryst. Growth 235, 365 ͑2002͒.
2 Y. Oshita, A. Ogura, A. Hoshino, S. Hiiro, and H. Machida, J. Cryst.
Growth 220, 604 ͑2000͒.
an Al/ALD–ZrO2 /ALD–Si–nitride capacitor measured at
20 kHz. The number of deposition cycles of ZrO2 was 15.
The observed hysteresis (⌬VFBϭ50 mV) is considered to be
due to charge trapping in ZrO2 and/or the ZrO2 /Si–nitride
interface. The damage that occurred during Al sputtering for
electrode formation is also a possible reason because we did
not carry out postmetallization annealing after sputtering.
The EOT value of the stack dielectrics is obtained to be 1.6
nm from the comparison with the calculated capacitance
͑broken line͒ for SiO2 dielectrics. The physical thickness
(Tphy) is observed to be 4.7 nm from TEM for the stack film.
Tphy consists of the ZrO2 layer (Tphyϭ4.2 nm) and the un-
derlying Si nitride layer (Tphyϭ0.5 nm). Taking these Tphy
values into account, the ⑀r value of the ALD ZrO2 layer is
obtained to be 12. In comparison with the calculated curve
͑broken curve͒, the interface trap density Dit was estimated
to be about 5ϳ4ϫ1012 cmϪ2 eVϪ1 between 0.1 and 0.3 eV
above the valence band edge. Also, the density of the posi-
tive fixed charge was estimated to be 5ϫ1012 cmϪ2 from the
flatband voltage shift. Details of the electrical properties in-
cluding leakage current will be reported elsewhere.
In summary, ultrathin ZrO2 films were successfully
formed by alternately supplying ZTB and H2O gases. Self-
limiting properties of film growth with ZTB exposure time
and H2O vapor pressure were achieved at a growth tempera-
ture of 200 °C. The deposited ZrO2 was amorphous when
annealed at 400 °C in the N2 ambient. Good smoothness at
the surface of ALD ZrO2 was obtained. XPS spectra showed
that the formed film consists of ZrO2 . TEM observation
showed that the Si nitride barrier layer successfully sup-
3 H. Ikeda, S. Goto, K. Honda, M. Sakashita, A. Sakai, S. Zaima, and Y.
Yasuda, Extended Abstracts of the Conference on Solid State Devices and
Materials, Tokyo, 2001, p. 498.
4 Y.-Z. Hu and S.-P. Tay, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19, 1706 ͑2001͒.
5 K. J. Hubbard and D. G. Schlom, J. Mater. Res. 11, 2757 ͑1996͒.
6 M. Balog, M. Schieber, M. Michman, and S. Patai, Thin Solid Films 47,
109 ͑1977͒.
7 W.-J. Qi, R. Nieh, B. H. Lee, L. Kang, Y. Jeon, K. Onishi, T. Ngai, S.
Banerjee, and J. C. Lee, Tech. Dig. - Int. Electron Devices Meet. 1999,
145 ͑1999͒.
8 Y. Ma, Y. Ono, L. Stecker, D. R. Evans, and S. T. Hsu, Tech. Dig. - Int.
Electron Devices Meet. 1999, 149 ͑1999͒.
9 T. S. Jeon, J. M. White and D. L. Kwong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 368
͑2001͒.
10 A. Nakajima, T. Yoshimoto, T. Kidera, K. Obata, S. Yokoyama, H. Su-
nami, and M. Hirose, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 2855 ͑2000͒.
11 A. Nakajima, T. Yoshimoto, T. Kidera, K. Obata, S. Yokoyama, H. Su-
nami, and M. Hirose, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19, 1138 ͑2001͒.
12 Q. D. M. Khosru, A. Nakajima, T. Yoshimoto, and S. Yokoyama, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 79, 3488 ͑2001͒.
13 A. Nakajima, T. Yoshimoto, T. Kidera, and S. Yokoyama, Appl. Phys. Lett.
79, 665 ͑2001͒.
14 A. Nakajima, Q. D. M. Khosru, T. Yoshimoto, T. Kidera, and S.
Yokoyama, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1252 ͑2002͒.
15 M. Copel, M. Gribelyuk, and E. Gusev, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 436 ͑2000͒.
16 C. M. Perkins, B. B. Triplett, P. C. Mclntyre, K. C. Saraswat, S. Haukka,
and M. Tuominen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2357 ͑2001͒.
17
¨
K. Kukli, M. Ritala, and M. Leskela, Chem. Vap. Deposition 6, 297
͑2000͒.
18 C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 7th ed. ͑Wiley, New York,
1996͒.
19 A. Nakajima and M. Ishigame, Solid State Ionics 146, 133 ͑2002͒.
20 M. J. Guittet, J. P. Crocombette, and M. Gautier-Soyer, Phys. Rev. B 63,
125117 ͑2001͒.
21 R. P. Vasquez, M. H. Hecht, F. J. Grunthaner, and M. L. Naiman, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 44, 969 ͑1984͒.
129.12.234.90 On: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 21:58:31