ARTICLE IN PRESS
B.-C. Kang et al. / Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 69 (2008) 128–132
132
and growth during the deposition [23]. In this experiment,
OTS can prevent nucleation for TiO2 and ZrO2 thin film on
the SAMs surfaces because it has hydrophobic terminal
group (–CH3), i.e., there are no reaction factors for
chemisorption between the metal-organic (MO) precursors
and –CH3 groups. But the MO precursors can obtain
electrons from the ‘‘base’’ originated from native oxide
layers on the Si(1 0 0) surface and they can make
chemisorptions with substrate very strongly. After all, thin
film is able to be formed on it. However, OTS SAMs are
weak in respect of thermal stability over 450 1C [25], they
should change their identities or make some defects on the
OTS SAMs area. Therefore, it is difficult to make thin films
selectively on substrates by combination of mCP and
MOCVD methods at high temperatures. Thomas et al.
showed that Ti(OiPr)2(tbaoac)2 precursor showed slightly
superior properties in terms of evaporation behavior,
deposition temperature, and smaller amount of residue
material than those of Zr(OiPr)2(tbaoac)2 precursor [24].
And Zr(OiPr)2(tbaoac)2 precursor could induce high van
der Waals force with OTS SAMs surface and low
molecular mobility on the OTS SAMs area owing to its
high molecular weight compared to Ti(OiPr)2(tbaoac)2.
These disadvantage factors should require a long nuclea-
tion time on the Si(1 0 0) substrate and cause less site-
selective deposition than that of TiO2 in our experiment.
However, it is expected that the combination of mCP
of SAMs and MOCVD is a better method for fabri-
cating micro-size, various functional thin films at low
temperatures.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support by the
BK21 project of Ministry of Education, Korea.
References
[1] K.S. Goto, Solid State Electrochemistry and its Applications to
Sensors and Electronics Devices, Elsevier, New York, 1988.
[2] L.A. Ryabova, Current Topics in Materials Science, vol. 7, North-
Holland, Amsterdam, 1981 (Chapter 5).
[3] M.F. Yan, W.W. Rhodes, Grain Boundaries in Semiconductors,
North-Holland, New York, 1981.
[4] J. Reintjes, M.B. Schultz, J. Appl. Phys. 39 (1968) 5254.
[5] S.J. Tauster, S.C. Fung, R.L. Garten, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100 (1978)
170.
[6] D.J. Dwyer, S.D. Cameron, J. Gland, Surf. Sci. 159 (1985) 430.
[7] J. Robertson, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 18 (2000) 1785.
[8] R. Nowak, S. Maruno, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 202 (1995) 226.
[9] S. Noda, J. Tepsanongsuk, Y. Tsuji, Y. Kajikawa, Y. Ogawa,
H. Komiyama, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 22 (2) (2004) 332.
[10] Y. Murayama, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 12 (4) (1975) 818.
[11] H.B. Nie, S.Y. Xu, S.J. Wang, L.P. You, Z. Yang, C.K. Ong, J. Li,
T.Y.F. Liew, Appl. Phys. A 73 (2001) 229.
4. Conclusions
[12] Y. Gao, K. Koumoto, Crystal Growth Des. 5 (5) (2005) 1983.
[13] Y. Xia, G. Whitesides, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37 (1998) 550.
[14] A. Kumar, H.A. Biebuyck, N.L. Abbott, G.M. Whitesides, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 9188.
We successfully deposited patterned TiO2 and ZrO2 thin
films directly using a combination method of mCP and
MOCVD methods. New developed precursors of
[M(OiPr)2(tbaoac)2, M ¼ Ti, Zr] were used as precursors
for TiO2 and ZrO2 thin films. In the case of TiO2
deposition, it showed a good selectivity growth on the
patterned Si(1 0 0) substrate. The boundaries between the
OTS SAMs area and TiO2 deposited area were very clean
cut and sharp without any breaks. The micro-Raman
spectroscopy and the EDX data showed that the deposited
TiO2 thin films were stoichiometric with anatase phase. In
the case of ZrO2 thin films, they showed a selective
deposition on the substrate as deposition time below 2 h;
however, the selectivity disappeared above 2 h. It means
that OTS should change or lose its identity due to high
temperature and/or long deposition time. Even though the
combination of MOCVD and mCP is a very convenient
technique to make micro-size structures without involving
photolithographic-type procedures, there are some limita-
tions such as deposition temperature and deposition time.
[15] N.L. Jeon, R.G. Nuzzo, Y. Xia, M. Mrksich, G.M. Whitesides,
Langmuir 11 (1994) 3024.
[16] A. Folch, M.A. Schmidt, IEEE J. Microelectromech. Syst. 8 (1)
(1999) 85.
[17] B.-C. Kang, J.-H. Lee, H.-Y. Chae, D.-Y. Jung, S.-B. Lee, J.-H. Boo,
J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 21 (4) (2003) 1773.
[18] R. Bhakta, F. Hipler, A. Devi, S. Regnery, P. Ehrhart, R. Waser,
Chem. Vap. Depos. 9 (2003) 295.
[19] U. Patil, M. Winter, H.-W. Becker, A. Devi, J. Mater. Chem. 13
(2003) 2177.
[20] B.-C. Kang, S.-B. Lee, J.-H. Boo, Surf. Coatings Technol. 131 (2000)
88.
[21] Y.H. Zhang, C.C. Chan, J.F. Porter, W. Guo, J. Mater. Res. 13
(1998) 2602.
[22] T.D. Robert, J.D. Laude, V.M. Geskin, R. Lazzaroni, R. Goutte-
baron, Thin Solid Films 440 (2003) 268.
[23] R. Chen, H. Kim, P.C. McIntyre, S.F. Bent, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84
(2004) 4017.
[24] R. Thomas, S. Regnery, P. Ehrhart, R. Washer, U. Patil, R. Bhakta,
A. Devi, Ferroelectrics 327 (2005) 111.
[25] H.K. Kim, J.P. Lee, C.R. Park, H.T. Kwak, M.M. Sung, J. Phys.
Chem. B 107 (2003) 4348.