Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
1554
G.A. Ragoisha, A.S. Bondarenko / Electrochimica Acta 50 (2005) 1553–1563
tation, which was elaborated later [9–11] for application
on personal computers. Fourier transform electrochemical
instrumentation uses simultaneous multi-frequency probing
and gives the transfer function by comparing the current sig-
nal spectrum with the voltage spectrum [5]. Repetitions of
the same procedure on each step of a staircase potential scan
give frequency responses as functions of electrode poten-
tial. Though the Fourier transform electrochemical instru-
mentation has been elaborated for three decades, it has not
replaced the common ac and dc voltammetry. The main prob-
lem with that technique comes from a very low intensity of
the constituent responses and their non-uniformity. The si-
multaneous analysis of multi-frequency responses is much
morerestrictedthanthesingle-frequencyanalysis. Responses
in different frequencies may differ in orders of magnitude;
therefore even small nonlinearity of the most intensive com-
ponent, which might be insignificant in the single-frequency
probing, hinders considerably the acquisition of low-level
components. The hindrance depends on the properties of the
system under investigation and therefore cannot be taken into
account before the measurement. For this reason the optimi-
sation of phases, which allows composing the probing signal
stituents [11], does not always result in the optimal response.
Equivalent electric circuit (EEC) analysis with Fourier trans-
form electrochemical instrumentation is difficult and very
few publications (see e.g. [12,13]) are available on the appli-
cation of that technique for decomposition of the potentiody-
namic frequency response into constituents related to EEC
elements.
The fundamental alternative to frequency response ac-
quisition with Fourier transform techniques that overcomes
intrinsic limitations in accuracy of simultaneous frequency
response analysis is the application of wavelets [14,15].
Wavelets are small waves terminated on the time scale. Due
to the termination, each frequency can be treated individu-
ally in streams composed of many wavelets, and this gives
the benefit of better response protection from the effects of
nonlinearity and noise. However, frequency scanning with
wavelets requires sophisticated real-time virtual instruments
capable of precise positioning of the probing and analysis in
the streams of responses (in the wavelet approach the fre-
quency response is analysed locally in different parts of the
time series, unlike the case with FFT, when the whole signal
is analysed simultaneously).
thousand times during the potential scan (the scan may be
either unidirectional or cyclic) with real-time representation
of the variation of the frequency response and dc current on a
computer screen. The EEC analysis in PDEIS is implemented
in the virtual spectrometer subroutine that utilises three dif-
ferent minimisation algorithms in order to provide reliable
fitting. PDEIS was used for characterisation of Cu upd on
gold [16], Pb upd on Te [17] and Ag upd on Pt [18].
In this work PDEIS was applied to systems of various
kind: (i) reversible, (ii) locally reversible but irreversible in
a wider potential range, and (iii) completely irreversible. In
each of the cases PDEIS provided different but substantial
opportunity for diversified fast characterisation of objects
under investigation. The combination of impedance spec-
troscopy, which is originally a stationary technique, with
the intrinsically non-stationary approach of potentiodynamic
techniques, appears to be constructive and helpful, despite
some self-contradiction of joining seemingly opposite ap-
proaches. The contradiction is actually just seeming, as the
impedance itself is not a stationary characteristic but just a
relation of the ac voltage to the ac current, which makes sense
both for stationary and nonstationary systems. The stationar-
ity in common EIS is required mainly for measurements in
infralow frequencies, therefore the latter have to be cut off in
potentiodynamic measurements. As a trade-off, the EECs ob-
tained by PDEIS can be incomplete. PDEIS does not attempt
to derive a complete EEC for an object under investigation.
Unlike common EIS, PDEIS investigates just a part of a trans-
fer function and concentrates on the evolution of the acquired
part of frequency response in the potential scan. The situation
with EIS and PDEIS is similar to the situation with station-
ary and potentiodynamic, in particular cyclic, voltammetry.
Both the voltammetries have different applications, and only
in certain cases they can be interchangeable. The main desti-
nation of PDEIS is the characterisation of variable interfaces.
This aspect of PDEIS was considered recently [17] on the ex-
ample of irreversible Pb upd on Te, the system complicated
by a spontaneous interaction of Pb monolayer with the sub-
strate. By applying PDEIS in this work to systems of various
kinds, we tried to present a wider view of the possibilities
of the versatile potentiodynamic response characterisation in
the systems with different extent of irreversibility.
2. Experimental
The potentiodynamic electrochemical impedance spec-
troscopy (PDEIS) [15] uses a common potentiostat and vir-
tual instruments on a personal computer for electrochem-
ical system probing with streams of mutually coordinated
wavelets and real-time analysis of the response. Similarly
to the Fourier transform electrochemical instrumentation,
PDEIS superimposes ac probing on the staircase potential
scan for the acquisition of frequency response variation. Due
to high power of modern computers and low-level optimi-
sation of virtual instruments, the snapshots of the frequency
response can be taken in PDEIS for hundreds or even several
PDEIS spectra were recorded using a technique that was
described in [15]. PDEIS virtual spectrometer is a computer
program that acquires ac and dc responses by means of a com-
mon potentiostat. The control of the PDEIS spectra record-
ing is very similar to the control of CV acquisition in com-
mon computerised potentiostats. The potential and frequency
ranges, periodicity of frequency response snapshots, scan
rate, number of cycles of the potential scan, ac amplitude
and several other parameters were set from the interface of
PDEIS 1.4 program before the scan. Ac amplitude of the