L.F. D’Elia et al. / Electrochimica Acta 49 (2004) 4197–4203
4203
destabilization; this is compared to the system toluene-surface
Acknowledgements
oxide without interaction. It is necessary to consider that the
calculated energy values show the real qualitative tendency;
however, these are slightly overestimated.
It may be noted that attracting interactions increase with
the numbers of the metallic atoms involved. However, in-
teractions via atoms of oxygen are generally repulsive;
these are much higher for CeO2 than TiO2. Attractive in-
teractions lead to light changes in the Fermi level of TiO2
Luis F. D’Elia would like to thank to PDVSA Intevep
(Filial de Petróleos de Venezuela, PDVSA) for the finan-
cial support and technical assistance. Special mention to Dr.
Victor Báez (PDVSA-Intevep) for his interest and excellent
advice for the development of this work.
(14.0325 eV); nevertheless, for CeO2 these interactions do
References
not have important effects in EF. It must be also highlighted
that materials were prepared under oxygen atmosphere,
this is why the Me/O surface relation should be extremely
small. As a result, the repulsive interactions become more
important than the attractive ones; being this effect much
more stronger for CeO2 than TiO2.
On the other hand, if Me/O surface relation is experimen-
tally increased (i.e., using another method of preparation)
the stabilizing interactions will be stronger and the charge
transfer reaction would be favored. At the experimental con-
ditions, toluene does not interact with the oxide surface so
the electron transfer reaction does not take place.
YAeHMOP, as the majority of the molecular orbital
calculation methods, does not consider solvent effects;
since calculations are done taking account the hypothesis
of vacuum. In this particular work, toluene showed the
same electrochemical behaviour in supporting electrolytes
with very different chemical and physical properties (0.1 M
[1] K. Rajeshwar, J.G. Ibañez, Environmental Electrochemistry: Fun-
damentals and Applications Abatement, Academic Press, London,
1997.
[2] Ch. Comninellis, Electrochim. Acta 39 (1994) 1857.
[3] Ch. Comninellis, C. Pulgarin, J. Appl. Electrochem. 23 (1993) 108.
[4] M.E.G. Lyons, C.H. Lyons, A. Michas, J. Electroanal. Chem. 351
(1993) 245.
[5] C. Bock, B. MacDougall, Electrochim. Acta 47 (2002) 3361.
[6] S. Park, R.J. Gorte, J.M. Vohs, Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 200 (2000) 55.
[7] S. Park, M. Vohs, R.J. Gorte, Nature 404 (2000) 265.
[8] V. Báez, D. Pletcher, J. Electroanal. Chem. 377 (1994) 231.
[9] V.V. Guliants, Catal. Today 51 (1999) 255.
[10] F.A. Grant, Rev. Modern Phys. 31 (1959) 646.
[
[
11] V. Báez, D. Pletcher, J. Electroanal. Chem. 382 (1995) 59.
12] M.A. Fox, in: R.D. Little, N.L. Weinberg (Eds.), Electroorganic
Synthesis, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1991, p. 181.
13] C. Bock, B. MacDougall, J. Electroanal. Chem. 491 (2000) 48.
14] R.J. Gorte, H. Kim, J.M. Vohs, J. Power Sources 106 (2002) 10.
[15] J.H. Hirschenhofer, D.B. Stauffer, R.R. Engleman, Fuel Cells A
Handbook, third ed., US Department of Energy, EEUU, 1994.
16] N.L. Weinberg, H.R. Weiberg, Chem. Rev. 68 (1968) 449.
[
[
[
[
[
H2SO4 and 0.1 M But4NPF + CH3CN); which drive us
6
17] S.W. Feldberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 88 (1966) 390.
18] J.S. Clarke, R.E. Ehigamusoe, A.T. Kuhn, J. Electroanal. Chem. 70
to suppose that solvent is not an important parameter to be
considered.
(1976) 33.
[
[
[
19] L.F. D’Elia, R. Ort ´ı z, in preparation.
20] L.F. D’Elia, R. Ort ´ı z, in preparation.
21] S.E. Treimer, J. Feng, M.D. Scholten, D.C. Johnson, A.J. Davenport,
4
. Conclusions
[
22] V. Báez, J.E. Graves, D. Pletcher, J. Electroanal. Chem. 340 (1992)
The electrochemical activity of the oxides electrodes
273.
towards toluene electroxidation could be theoretically sup-
ported considering two important aspects: (i) the attractive
interactions, between toluene and the metal oxide surface,
lead small changes in the Fermi level of TiO2 (14.0325 eV);
however, for CeO2 these interactions do not have important
effects in the EF value; (ii) materials prepared under oxygen
atmosphere yields metal oxides with a very small Me/O
surface relation; which makes repulsive interactions more
important than the attractive.
At the experimental conditions TiO2 showed some activ-
ity since interactions favored the charge transfer reaction.
The Fermi level is stabilized and attractive interactions are
stronger than repulsive ones, even when interactions via
oxygen atoms are considered. On the contrary, interactions
do not have any positive effect in the energy parameters of
CeO2; in this case the repulsive interactions predominate
over stabilization.
[23] G.A. Landrum, YAeHMOP: Yet Another extended Hückel Molec-
ular Package, YAeHMOP is freely available on the www at URL:
[
[
[
24] M. Berndt, Inorganic Cambridge Structural Data Base
(ICSD)-Retrieve 2.01, 1997.
25] International Center for Difraction Data (ICDD), Podwer Difraction
Files (PDF) 2.02, 1999.
26] K. Branderburg, Diamond Visual Crystal Structure Information
System-Crystal Impact GbR., 1998.
[27] Perkin-Elmer, XPS Data Handbook, 1992.
[28] A.J. Bard, L.R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals
and Applications, second ed., Wiley, New York, 2001.
[29] R. Hoffmann, Solids and Surfaces. A Chemist’s Point of View of
Bonding in Extended Structures, VCH Publishers Inc., New York,
1988.
[30] T.A. Albright, J.K. Burdett, M. Whangbo, Orbital Interactions in
Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1985.
[31] R. Hoffmann, J. Chem. Phys. 39 (1963) 1397.
[32] G.V. Samsonov, The Oxide Handbook, second ed., IFL-Plenum, New
York, 1982.