Speciation in the AlCl3/SO2Cl2 Catholyte System
reflections. Lattice determination and data collection were carried
out using SMART Version 5.054 software. Data reduction was
performed using SAINT Version 6.01 software. The structure
refinement was performed using XSHELL 3.0 software. The data
were corrected for absorption using the SADABS program within
the SAINT software package.
mix and flood the remaining chemical constituents of the
battery. The information garnered will assist in understanding
and improving battery performance over extended time
frames and in identifying storage protocols that extend battery
shelf life. This report details the observed chemical changes
the SO2Cl2/AlCl3 catholyte solution underwent as determined
by 27Al NMR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and single-
crystal X-ray diffraction, which identified a unique inter-
mediate species [Cl2Al(µ-O2SCl)]2 (1)8sthe first adduct ever
isolated for this catholyte system. The synthesis of this
compound and the other species characterized in this system
are discussed below.
Discussion
Due to the dearth of information concerning the species
present in the AlCl3/SO2Cl2 solution and our interest in using
this catholyte system, we undertook a series of analytical
investigations to elucidate the chemical speciation of this
system. Several key conditions were varied: (i) the amount
of water present, (ii) the AlCl3 concentration, (iii) solution
storage or aging temperature, and (iv) the solvent. The
changes in this system were analyzed using NMR and Raman
spectroscopies in conjunction with single-crystal X-ray
diffraction.
Precursor Materials. Our initial investigations focused
on the properties of the starting materials in solution. All
attempts to purify the precursors only resulted in the inclusion
of additional contaminants or no improvement in purity.
Double sublimation of an alternative source of AlCl3 (98%)
did not remove the fluorescent impurities that dominated the
region of the Raman spectrum of interest to us; however,
the as-received 99.99% pure materials did not possess these
fluorescent contaminants. During distillation of SO2Cl2,
corrosive attack by the solvent introduced organic species
(i.e., decomposition products of silicon grease, Tygon tubing)
into the distilled material. Therefore, the reagents were used
as received but opened and handled only under an argon
atmosphere.
Experimental Section
All compounds described below were handled with rigorous
exclusion of air and water using standard Schlenk line and glovebox
techniques. The SO2Cl2 (MCB Reagents), AlCl3 (99.999%, Aldrich),
and SO2(g) (TriGas, Inc.) were opened and used as received, in a
glovebox under an argon atmosphere. The various solution con-
centrations were prepared by dissolving preweighed AlCl3 into
measured amounts of SO2Cl2. Water was added via syringe to the
appropriate samples. All samples were prepared under argon
atmospheres by placing aliquots of the appropriate solutions into
Pyrex NMR tubes and then flame-sealing the tube under vacuum.
The solution 27Al NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker
DRX400 instrument operating at 104.2 MHz using a 5 mm broad
band probe operating at 298 K. Typical acquisition conditions
included between 16 and 64 scans averaging, 1 s recycle delay, 8
K complex points using a 600 ppm spectral width. Chemical shifts
were referenced to a secondary standard 1 M Al[H2O]63+, δ ) 0.0
ppm.
The Raman spectra were obtained using a triple spectrograph
and charge-coupled-device detector for dispersing and recording
the Raman-scattered light. A 90° scattering configuration and a 785
nm excitation laser were used to obtain Raman spectra from the
solutions sealed in NMR tubes. For gelled species in sealed
containers, we employed a 458 nm excitation laser and a microscope
accessory in a 180° scattering configuration.
[Cl2Al(µ-O2SCl)]2 (1). In a glovebox, AlCl3 (2.00 g, 14.9 mmol)
was added to a vial of SO2Cl2 (∼10 mL) to form an ∼1.5 M
solution. The yellow mixture was stirred for 12 h and became
progressively darker in color. After sitting for an extended period
of time, the resulting brown solution was placed into a freezer (-25
°C) for 2 days. Clear crystals were observed at low-temperature;
however, any attempt to isolate them at room temperature resulted
in their melting, which prevented obtaining bulk analytical data
for 1. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by
pouring off the mother liquor and placing the vial containing the
crystalline material in an ice bath prior to manipulating them on a
homemade, liquid nitrogen cooled coldfinger.
X-ray Crystal Structure Information.9 The crystal was mounted
onto a thin glass fiber under an atmosphere of flowing liquid N2,
and immediately placed under a liquid N2 stream, on a Bruker AXS
diffractometer. The radiation used was graphite-monochromatized
Mo KR radiation (λ ) 0.7107 Å). The lattice parameters were
optimized from a least-squares calculation on carefully centered
The 27Al NMR chemical shift is directly related to the
coordination of the Al metal centers. AlCl3 dissolved in
toluene-d8 revealed a broad 27Al singlet (250 Hz) at δ )
+102 ppm. This chemical shift is consistent with tetra-
hedrally (Td) bound Al metal centers.10-13 The large line
width suggests either changes in the electrical field gradient
or an increase in the correlation time of these field gradient
fluctuations due to solvent interactions, increased aggregation
of the molecular species, or chemical exchange with other
Al-containing species in solution. The observed signal in our
sample is consistent with a Td Al species found for AlCl3 in
nonpolar solvents and melted AlCl3, instead of the nominal
octahedral coordination Al species (δ ∼ 0 ppm) observed
for the room-temperature solid-state AlCl3 structure.10-13
Proposed Td species for this solution species include Al2Cl6
-
or AlCl4 , which are known to be relatively insensitive to
concentration and temperature but have a 27Al chemical shift
that is solvent-dependent.12,13 The 27Al chemical shift of the
-
Al2Cl7 dimer is reported to be δ ) +116 ppm.14 For
(10) Gray, J. L.; Maciel, G. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 7147.
(11) Legrand, L.; Heintz, M.; Tranchant, A.; Messina, R. Electrochim. Acta
1995 40, 1711.
(12) Cerny´, Z.; Macha´cek, J.; Fusek, J.; Ca´sensky´, B.; Kriz, O.; Tuck, D.
G. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1998, 1439.
(8) Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom,
2004).
(9) The listed versions of SAINT, SMART, XSHELL, and XPOW in
SHELXTL and SADABS Software from Bruker Analytical X-ray
Systems Inc., (Madison, WI) were used in the analysis.
(13) Cerny´, Z.; Macha´cek, J.; Fusek, J.; Ca´sensky´, B.; Kriz, O.; Tuck, D.
G. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 300, 556.
(14) Gray, J. L.; Maciel, G. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 7147.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 44, No. 16, 2005 5935