Paper
RSC Advances
could be adjusted and used in ML dehydration reaction. 72% AA
selectivity was achieved over 6 : 4 ratio of K HPO and Al (SO )
4 3
2
4
2
and 45 wt% supported MCM-41 catalyst. The higher selectivity
for acrylic acid should be correlated to the synergistic effect of
the weaker acid site density and moderate basic site density as
well as the acidic–basicity ratio. The catalyst showed a good
stability and could be regenerated aer air treatment.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Science
and Technology, PR China for the nancial support of Project
2013CB733600. We would also thank China Postdoctoral
Science Foundation (2013M530515).
Fig. 11 XRD patterns of modified catalyst of fresh, reaction and recycle
sample.
References
1
L. F. Boesel and R. L. Reis, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2008, 33, 180–
90.
were examined with XRD (Fig. 11). It could be seen that the
main peaks of the three samples were quite similar except the
new peak centered at 26.6 belonging to graphite appeared for
the reaction one. Aer the regeneration, the graphite peak
disappeared and the prole became the same as the fresh one,
indicating that the catalyst could be totally regenerated.
Besides, it was proved that the dehydration reaction and the
regeneration process had little effect on the catalyst structure,
indicating that the samples could be promising industrial
catalysts with its good stability.
1
ꢀ
2 C. M. Tang, Y. Zeng, X. G. Yang, Y. C. Lei and G. Y. Wang, J.
Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2009, 314, 15–20.
3
X. Xu, J. Lin and P. Cen, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2006, 14, 419–
27.
4
4
V. Grabovac, D. Guggi and A. B. Schn u¨ rch, Adv. Drug Delivery
Rev., 2005, 57, 1713–1723.
M. M. Lin, Appl. Catal., A, 2001, 207, 1–16.
5
6
X. J. Yang, R. M. Feng, W. J. Ji and C. T. Au, J. Catal., 2008,
253, 57–65.
7
M. M. Lin, Appl. Catal., A, 2003, 250, 305–318.
4
. Discussion
8 P. Botella, J. M. L. Nieto, B. Solsona, A. Mifsud and
F. M ´a rquez, J. Catal., 2002, 209, 445–455.
It has been known that the catalytic dehydration rate of alcohol
over catalyst would be dependent on the catalyst surface acid–
base property. An attempt is made to correlate the rates of ML
conversion and AA formation with the surface acidity and
basicity of the modied catalysts. The acidic amounts and
basicity amounts calculated by NH (CO )-TPD as well as the
9
X. Tong, Y. Ma and Y. Li, Appl. Catal., A, 2010, 385, 1–13.
1
1
1
1
1
1
0 P. Sun, D. H. Yu, Z. C. Tang, H. Li and H. Huang, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res., 2010, 49, 9082–9087.
1 P. Sun, D. H. Yu, K. M. Fu, M. Y. Gu, Y. Wang, H. Huang and
H. H. Ying, Catal. Commun., 2009, 10, 1345–1349.
2 M. H. Gao, M. Hiratu, E. Toorisaka and T. Hano, Bioresour.
Technol., 2006, 97, 2414–2420.
3 M. A. Abdel-Rahman, Y. Tashiro and K. Sonomoto,
Biotechnol. Adv., 2013, 31, 877–902.
4 M. A. Abdel-Rahman, Y. Tashiro and K. Sonomoto, J.
Biotechnol., 2011, 156, 286–301.
5 M. Jarvinen, L. Myllykoski, R. Keiski and J. Sohlo,
Bioseparation, 2000, 9, 163–166.
3
2
ratio between acidic and basicity were shown in Table 1. MCM-
1 showed the lowest AA selectivity due to its strong acidic sites.
4
For the other three samples, the AA selectivity was negatively
related to the acidic density and 45% sample showed the lowest
acidic density and highest AA selectivity. Basic sites should play
an important role in the dehydration reaction since it can
dissociate H–C bond and enhance the dehydration reaction. In
our study, the best AA selectivity appeared when the acid–basic
1
1
6 Y. Fan, C. Zhou and X. Zhu, Catal. Rev., 2009, 51, 293–324.
7 Y. Matsuura, A. Onda, S. Ogo and K. Yanagisawa, Catal.
Today, 2014, 226, 192–197.
¼
1.91 on the 45% sample, which was different from the result
of Xu (acidic–basicity ¼ 4) and Loridant (acidic–basicity ¼ 1).
The difference may come from different catalysts and the
precursors between LA and ML. In general, specic to this
catalyst, the acid–basic z 1.9 was best for the AA selectivity. The
best acidic–basicity ratio varied on catalysts may attribute to the
ML adsorption or consecutive reactions.
1
1
2
2
8 Y. Matsuura, A. Onda and K. Yanagisawa, Catal. Commun.,
2014, 48, 5–10.
9 C. M. Tang, J. S. Peng, G. C. Fan, X. L. Li, X. L. Pu and W. Bai,
Catal. Commun., 2014, 43, 231–234.
0 J. Yan, D. H. Yu, P. Sun and H. Huang, Chin. J. Catal., 2011,
3
2, 405–411.
1 J. Yan, D. H. Yu, H. Li, P. Sun and H. Huang, J. Rare Earths,
010, 28, 803–806.
ratio, 22 J. F. Zhang, Y. L. Zhao, M. Pan, X. Z. Feng, W. J. Ji and
5
. Conclusion
2
By modifying the loading amount and K
2
HPO
4
–Al
2
(SO
4
)
3
the surface acid–basic properties of MCM-41 based catalyst
C. T. Au, ACS Catal., 2011, 1, 32–41.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 45679–45686 | 45685