6
994
Y. K. Rao et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 18 (2010) 6987–6994
5
.8. Soft agar colony formation assay
Anchorage-independent growth assay of A549 cells was per-
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by National Science Council of Taiwan
(NSC 98-2811-M-324-001 and NSC 99-2811-M-324-003).
15
formed by the method as we described previously.
5
.9. Fluorescence immunocytochemistry and confocal
microscopy
Supplementary data
4
A549 cells were seeded (1 ꢁ 10 cells per chamber) onto an
eight-chamber slide (Nunc 177402, Naperville, IL). Cells were ren-
dered quiescent, followed by treatment with HTMC for the indi-
cated concentration. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for
2
2
0 min and permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for
0 min. Washed cells was incubated in 1% BSA in PBS for 1 h. For
co-immunostaining, cells were first incubated with an antibody
against hTERT (rabbit, 1:250; 1 h, room temperature; Rockland,
Gilbertsville, PA), and tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate goat
anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) conjugate was used as a secondary antibody
References and notes
1.
Philippi, C.; Loretz, B.; Schaefer, U. F.; Lehr, C. M. J. Controlled Release 2010, 146,
28.
2
2. O’Sullivan, R. J.; Karlseder, J. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 171.
3. Shay, J. W.; Keith, W. N. Br. J. Cancer 2008, 98, 677.
4
.
Ueno, T.; Takahashi, H.; Oda, M.; Mizunuma, M.; Yokoyama, A.; Goto, Y.;
Mizushina, Y.; Sakaguchi, K.; Hayashi, H. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 5995.
Togashi, K.; Kakeya, H.; Morishita, M.; Song, Y. X.; Osada, H. Oncol Res. 1998, 10,
449.
(
1:100, 1 h; ZyMax™ Grade, Invitrogen, Carlsboad, CA). Slides were
mounted with mount medium and dried at room temperature. Nu-
5
.
0
6. Noguchi, M.; Yokoyama, M.; Watanabe, S.; Uchiyama, M.; Nakao, Y.; Hara, K.;
clei were counterstained with 0.2
l
g of DAPI (4 ,6-diamidino-2-
Iwasaka, T. Cancer Lett. 2006, 234, 135.
phenylindole) per mL. Computer-assisted image analysis of fluo-
rescence was performed using a confocal microscopy scanning la-
ser microscope (Leica TCS, wavelength excitation 488 nm, emission
7.
Shchekotikhin, A. E.; Glazunova, V. A.; Dezhenkova, L. G.; Luzikov, Y. N.;
Sinkevich, Y. B.; Kovalenko, L. V.; Buyanov, V. N.; Balzarini, J.; Huang, F. C.; Lin, J.
J.; Huang, H. S.; Shtil, A. A.; Preobrazhenskaya, M. N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009,
1
7, 1861.
5
25 nm for FITC; 540/570 nm for TRITC).
8
.
.
Huang, H. S.; Chen, T. C.; Chen, R. H.; Huang, K. F.; Huang, F. C.; Jhan, J. R.; Chen,
C. L.; Lee, C. C.; Lo, Y.; Lin, J. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 7418.
Huang, H. S.; Huang, K. F.; Li, C. L.; Huang, Y. Y.; Chiang, Y. H.; Huang, F. C.; Lin, J.
J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 6976.
9
5
.10. Intracellular free calcium measurement
1
1
1
0. Franceschin, M.; Alvino, A.; Casagrande, V.; Mauriello, C.; Pascucci, E.; Savino,
M.; Ortaggi, G.; Bianco, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 1848.
1. Franceschin, M.; Lombardo, C. M.; Pascucci, E.; D’Ambrosio, D.; Micheli, E.;
Bianco, A.; Ortaggi, G.; Savino, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 2292.
2. Micheli, E.; D’Ambrosio, D.; Franceschin, M.; Savino, M. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem.
2009, 9, 1622.
A549 cells were grown on poly-
L
-lysine coated glass coverslips
at 5 ꢁ 10 cells in 35 mm dish, and then treated with 25 M HTMC
for 24 h. Other cells were pretreated for 1 h with MEK inhibitor
U0126 (10 M), or ERK inhibitor PD98059 (20 M), or MAPK
inhibitor SB203580 (50 M), or intracellular calcium chelator
BAPTA-AM (20 M), or 26S proteasome inhibitor MG132 (20 M),
or nuclear export inhibitor leptomycin B (20 nM), or PI3 K inhibitor
LY294002 (50 M) and then treated with 25 M HTMC for 24 h.
Cells were rinsed twice with HBSS (20 mM HEPES, 10 mM glucose,
50 mM NaCl, 1.2 mM CaCl , 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl , pH 7.4). They
were then loaded with 3 M Fura-3/AM dissolved in HBSS from a
working solution and 0.02% pluronic acid F-127, at 37 °C for
0 min and then rinsed twice with HBSS. Next, the cells were incu-
4
l
l
l
l
13. Liao, C. H.; Hsiao, Y. M.; Hsu, C. P.; Lin, M. Y.; Wang, J. C.; Huang, Y. L.; Ko, J. L.
Mol. Carcinog. 2006, 45, 220.
l
l
14. Liao, C. H.; Hsiao, Y. M.; Sheu, G. T.; Chang, J. T.; Wang, P. H.; Wu, M. F.; Shieh, G.
J.; Hsu, C. P.; Ko, J. L. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007, 74, 1541.
l
l
15. Liao, C. H.; Hsiao, Y. M.; Lin, C. H.; Yeh, C. S.; Wang, J. C.; Ni, C. H.; Hsu, C. P.; Ko,
J. L. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 1851.
16. Hsin, I. L.; Sheu, G. T.; Chen, H. H.; Chiu, L. Y.; Wang, H. D.; Chan, H. W.; Hsu, C.
1
2
2
P.; Ko, J. L. Mutat. Res. 2010, 688, 72.
l
17. Male, K. B.; Rao, Y. K.; Tzeng, Y. M.; Montes, J.; Kamen, A.; Luong, J. H. Chem. Res.
Toxicol. 2008, 21, 2127.
18. Yeh, C. T.; Rao, Y. K.; Yao, C. J.; Yeh, C. F.; Li, C. H.; Chuang, S. E.; Luong, J. H.; Lai,
6
G. M.; Tzeng, Y. M. Cancer Lett. 2009, 285, 73.
bated in HBSS for an additional 30 min to allow complete de-ester-
ification of the dye. Calcium imaging was accomplished using an
LSM 410 invert confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss Jena,
Germany). Excitation was done by the 488 nm line of an argon laser,
emission was collected using a 505–550 band pass filter, and pin-
hole was set at 1.87 airy units. Confocal imaging was performed
with a resolution of 512 ꢁ 512 pixel at 256 intensity. The frame rate
was 1 frame/min. Several cells were viewed together through 20ꢁ
plan-Neofluar Zeiss objective (0.5 NA) using a factor-2 computer
zoomed image. Detailed images were also collected using a 40ꢁ
plan-Neofluar Zeiss objective (1.3 NA).
19. Geethangili, M.; Fang, S. H.; Lai, C. H.; Rao, Y. K.; Lien, H. M.; Tzeng, Y. M. Food
Chem. 2010, 119, 149.
20. Hsieh, Y. C.; Rao, Y. K.; Wu, C. C.; Huang, C. Y.; Geethangili, M.; Hsu, S. L.; Tzeng,
Y. M. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2010, 23, 1256.
21. Rao, Y. K.; Fang, S. H.; Tzeng, Y. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 2679.
22. Fang, S. H.; Rao, Y. K.; Tzeng, Y. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 2381.
23. Rao, Y. K.; Fang, S. H.; Tzeng, Y. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 6850.
24. Rao, Y. K.; Geethangili, M.; Fang, S. H.; Tzeng, Y. M. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45,
1770.
25. Fang, S. H.; Rao, Y. K.; Tzeng, Y. M. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 116, 333.
2
2
6. Rao, Y. K.; Fang, S. H.; Tzeng, Y. M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 7909.
7. Berletch, J. B.; Liu, C.; Love, W. K.; Andrews, L. G.; Katiyar, S. K.; Tollefsbol, T. O.
J. Cell. Biochem. 2008, 103, 509.
28. Srinivas, K. V.; Rao, Y. K.; Mahender, I.; Das, B.; Krishna, K. V. R.; Kishore, K. H.;
Murty, U. S. Phytochemistry 2003, 63, 789.
2
9. Maritz, M. F.; Napier, C. E.; Wen, V. W.; MacKenzie, K. L. Future Oncol. 2010, 6,
5
.11. Statistics
769.
30. Bellon, M.; Nicot, C. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2008, 100, 98.
3
1. Li, Z.; Zhao, J.; Du, Y.; Park, H. R.; Sun, S. Y.; Bernal-Mizrachi, L.; Aitken, A.;
Khuri, F. R.; Fu, H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 162.
2. Puceat, M.; Jaconi, M. Cell Calcium 2005, 38, 383.
The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation of tripli-
cate experiments. Statistical comparisons were made by means
of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a Duncan
3
33. Rosenberger, S.; Thorey, I. S.; Werner, S.; Boukamp, P. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282,
*
6126.
multiple-comparison test. The symbol ( ) indicates p <0.05 when
compared with untreated controls.