9
À1 À1
s , which is close to
The absorption band at l = 420 nm remained at 24 ms after
photoexcitation, on the other hand, the absorption bands at l =
linear plot in Fig. 4d to be 4.6 Â 10 M
1
the diffusion limited value. The second-order rate constant
2
ꢀ
+
ꢀ
+
6
90 nm and at around 1000 nm assigned to the NA and p-dimer
of electron transfer from oxalate to the NA
moiety was
À1 À1
s , which is only 1/300 of kred(O2). Thus, in the
10,11
radical cation, respectively,
7
disappeared in this period. This
1.6 Â 10 M
ꢀ
+
ꢀ
observation suggests that electron transfer from oxalate to the
+
reaction solution, the reduction of O by QuPh –NA
2
ꢀ
NA
moiety of the p-dimer radical cation occurs as predicted
is faster than the oxidation of oxalate even though the
concentration of O (1.3 mM) is smaller than the concen-
tration of oxalate (0–6 mM). These values support the reaction
ꢀ
+
by the higher one-electron reduction potential of the NA moiety
2
10
(Ered = 1.87 V vs. SCE) than the onset oxidation potential of
oxalate (0.80 V vs. SCE in a deaerated mixed solution of a buffer
and MeCN [1 : 1 (v/v)] as shown in Fig. S2 in ESIw).
2
mechanism shown in Scheme 1b, in which the O reduction by
ꢀ
QuPh occurs first and then the remaining electron transfer
À
ꢀ
+
ꢀ
+
to NA occurs to oxidize oxalate.
with oxalate using
The electron transfer from oxalate to the NA
moiety of
from (COO )
2
the p-dimer radical cation was monitored by the decay curves
of absorption at 690 nm at various concentrations of oxalate
as shown in Fig. 4a. The rate obeyed pseudo-first-order
2 2
This is the first report to produce H O
an electron donor–acceptor linked dyad as a robust photo-
catalyst. Oxalate acts as an efficient electron donor in the
photocatalytic two-electron reduction of O to produce H O
2
kinetics and the pseudo-first-order rate constant (kobs
)
2
2
increased linearly with increasing concentration of oxalate.
with a high F value (14%). Laser flash photolysis measurements
manifested that electron transfer from the photogenerated
The second-order rate constant (k ) of electron transfer from
ox
ꢀ
+
oxalate to the NA moiety of the p-dimer radical cation
was determined from the slope of a linear plot in Fig. 4b to be
ꢀ
ꢀ
+
+
+
p-dimer radical cation [(QuPh –NA )(QuPh –NA)] to O
2
+
ꢀ
occurs first to afford QuPh –NA , followed by electron
7
À1 À1
ꢀ
+
1
.6 Â 10 M
s
.
transfer from oxalate to NA
.
ꢀ
The electron transfer from QuPh to oxygen was monitored
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid (No. 20108010
to S.F. and 24350069 to Y.Y.) from the Ministry of Education,
Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan and NRF/
MEST of Korea through the WCU (R31-2008-000-10010-0)
and GRL (2010-00353) Programs.
by the decay curves of absorption at 420 nm shown in Fig. 4c
in the presence of various concentrations of oxygen. The rate
obeyed pseudo-first-order kinetics and the pseudo-first-order
rate constant (kobs) increased in proportion to concentration
of oxygen. The second-order rate constant (kred(O2)) of electron
ꢀ
Notes and references
transfer from QuPh to O was determined from the slope of a
2
1
(a) M. K. Tse, S. Bhor, M. Klawonn, G. Anilkumar, H. Jiao,
A. Spannenberg, C. Dobler, W. Magerlein, H. Hugl and M. Beller,
¨
¨
Chem.–Eur. J., 2006, 16, 1875; (b) Catalytic Oxidations with
Hydrogen Peroxide as Oxidant, ed. G. Strukul, Kluwer Academic,
Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1992.
2
(a) Y. Yamada, S. Yoshida, T. Honda and S. Fukuzumi, Energy
Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 2822; (b) A. E. Sanli and A. Aytac,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36, 869; (c) S. Fukuzumi, Y. Yamada
and K. D. Karlin, Electrochim. Acta, 2012, DOI: 10.1016/
j.electacta.2012.03.132, in press.
3
4
(a) E. Santacesaria, M. D. Serio, R. Veloti and U. Leone, Ind. Eng.
Chem. Res., 1994, 33, 277; (b) D. Hancu and E. J. Beckman, Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res., 1999, 38, 2833; (c) D. Hancu and E. J. Beckman,
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2000, 39, 2843.
(a) Standard Potentials in Aqueous Solution, ed. A. J. Bard, R. Parsons
and J. Jordan, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1985; (b) D. B. Haytowitz
and R. H. Matthews, Agriculture Handbook No. 8–11, Science and
Education Administration, USDA, Washington, D.C., 1984.
A. Hodgkinson, Oxalic Acid in Biology and Medicine, Academic
Press, London, 1977.
5
6
(a) M. Teranishi, S. Naya and H. Tada, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010,
1
32, 7850; (b) D. Tsukamoto, A. Shiro, Y. Shiraishi, Y. Sugano,
S. Ichikawa, S. Tanaka and T. Hirai, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 599;
c) V. Maurino, C. Minero, G. Mariella and E. Pelizzetti, Chem.
Commun., 2005, 2627.
(
Fig. 4 (a) Decay time profile of absorption at 690 nm due to
+
7 (a) M. Fukushima, K. Tatsumi, S. Tanaka and H. Nakamura,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 1998, 32, 3948; (b) S. Fukuzumi, S. Kuroda
and T. Tanaka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 3020.
8 (a) A. J. Hoffman, E. R. Carraway and M. R. Hoffmann, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 1994, 28, 776; (b) T. R. Rubin, J. G. Calvert,
G. T. Rankin and W. MacNevin, J. Phys. Chem., 1953, 75, 2850.
ꢀ
ꢀ
QuPh –NA
at various concentrations of oxalate (0.38 mM, red;
1
.50 mM, blue; 2.3 mM, green; 3.0 mM, black) in the presence of
+
+
QuPh –NA (0.056 mM). QuPh –NA
ꢀ
ꢀ
was produced by the laser
excitation (l = 355 nm) of a deaerated mixed solution of a phosphate
buffer (pH 7.0) and MeCN [1 : 1 (v/v)]. (b) Plot of the pseudo-first-
order rate constant (kobs) for electron transfer from oxalate to
9
S. Yamazaki, Y. Yamada, N. Fujiwara, T. Ioroi, Z. Shiroma,
H. Senoh and K. Yasuda, J. Electroanal. Chem., 2007, 602, 96.
ꢀ
ꢀ
+
QuPh –NA
vs. [oxalate]. (c) Decay time profile of absorption at
10 H. Kotani, K. Ohkubo and S. Fukuzumi, Faraday Discuss., 2012,
155, 89.
ꢀ
ꢀ
+
20 nm due to QuPh –NA with various concentrations of O
4
2
(red,
1
1 Y. Yamada, T. Miyahigashi, H. Kotani, K. Ohkubo and
S. Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 16136.
0
.0081 mM; blue, 0.016 mM; green, 0.024 mM; pink, 0.033 mM;
+
purple, 0.049 and gray, 0.065 mM) in the presence of QuPh –NA
1
2 (a) S. Fukuzumi, H. Miyao, K. Ohkubo and T. Suenobu, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 2005, 109, 3285; (b) S. Fukuzumi and S. Kuroda, Res.
Chem. Intermed., 1999, 25, 789.
(
0.056 mM). (d) Plot of the pseudo-first-order rate constant (kobs) for
+
ꢀ
ꢀ
2 2
electron transfer from QuPh –NA to O vs. [O ].
This journal is c The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 8329–8331 8331