G Model
CATTOD-8912; No. of Pages8
ARTICLE IN PRESS
S. Sterchele et al. / Catalysis Today xxx (2014) xxx–xxx
7
addition of 0.25% (w/w) platinum, or more, suppressed the induc-
tion times for the production of both H O and H O . As the former
was longer than the latter, this made the bimetallic Pd-Pt cata-
lysts less selective. The related bimetallic Pd-Pt catalysts obtained
from the reduction of the precursors with formaldehyde were ini-
tially somewhat more productive, but even less selective (<40%)
for the latter set of catalysts to compare with, it can be appreciated
that 1Pd05AuK2621 is featured by the presence of some Au(I) in the
nanostructured metal phase and this could be also connected to the
selectivity decrease. On the other hand 1Pd1AuK2621 is practically
as selective as 1Pd025AuK2621. The presence of larger nanoclusters
in 1Pd1AuK2621, which has larger size and broader size distri-
bution than 1Pd025AuK2621, could at least in part explain this
recovery of selectivity upon increasing the gold content from 0.5
to 1% (w/w) [9].
To summarize, our data show that the addition of platinum to
the polymer-supported Pd catalysts yielded more active, but less
selective, materials when the platinum amount is 0.25% (w/w)
or higher. It is not clear, however, why the changes in the metal
composition of Pd-Pt catalyst, in the size and size distribution of
the metal nanoparticles did not influence appreciably the selectiv-
ity. We also found some differences between the catalysts (both
monometallic Pd and bimetallic Pd-Pt) obtained upon reduction of
2
2
2
[
9] than their counterparts reduced with H2 described herein. Also
the monometallic catalyst reduced with formaldehyde was pretty
less selective than 1PdK2621. From the point of view of the selec-
tivity, H2 seems therefore to be better than formaldehyde as the
agent for the reduction of the precursors of Pd and Pt. Also in the
case of the formaldehyde reduction route the bimetallic catalysts in
general were never more selective than the related monometallic
one, with the only exception of the material with 0.1% Pt [9]. This
relatively low level of Pt was not used in the present work; never-
theless the selectivity data of the new catalysts obtained from the
H2 reduction route confirm that platinum is useful to improve the
catalytic performance only in very little amount, in agreement with
our own [9] and other previous literature findings [12].
In comparison with platinum, the addition of gold has a similar
effect on the activity, which was higher than in the monometal-
lic catalyst, as shown by the kinetic plots of Fig. 6 (lower panel).
However the productivities are smaller than those of the bimetal-
lic Pd-Pt. This is reflected also in the values of t1/2, which are
intermediate between those of the Pd-Pt catalysts and the one
of the monometallic catalyst. In comparison with 1PdK2621, only
the metal precursors with H , described in this work, and related
2
materials which were obtained upon formaldehyde reduction of
the same precursors [9]. Whereas the catalysts reduced with H2
are less active, but generally more selective, at the highest Pt
contents, the bimetallic catalysts from the formaldehyde reduc-
tion route are practically as selective as the related monometallic
material. Moreover, the differences in the catalytic performance of
the Pd-Pt catalysts from the formaldehyde reduction route were
comparatively larger and were tentatively explained by product
poisoning (in particular by H O ). In the case of the H -reduced
1
Pd025AuK2621 was somewhat more selective. In fact its selectiv-
2
2
2
ity at 50% H2 conversion was higher and inspection of Fig. 6 (upper
panel) shows that it was likely just a bit more selective also in the
first 10–15 min of the reaction. With higher Au amounts, the Pd-
Au bimetallic catalysts described herein are never more selective
than 1PdK2621, unless relatively long reaction time are considered.
This is in line with the observation that relatively little amounts
of gold are required to have an effective promotion of palladium,
although positive effects have been observed up to a molar Pd:Au
ratio of 2:1 (corresponding approximately to 1% (w/w) for both
in the catalyst) [4,5,7,16]. As pointed out above, the conversion of
H2 over these Pd-Au catalysts is never quantitative and some pro-
duction of H O in the final stage still balanced its dismutation,
catalysts differences are too small to provide either further sup-
port or disputation of this hypothesis. These circumstances are in
agreement with previous reports [6,12,30] that the overall catalytic
performance seems to be much more dependent by the preparative
method used for synthetize the metal nanoparticles compared to
their size and size-distribution. This could be related to changes
in the topology or other features of the surface, when different
protocols of reduction are employed, possibly arising from differ-
ent morphological properties of the nanostructured metal phase.
To unravel these properties an in-depth investigation, which was
beyond the scope of this work, is required and will be the subject
of future work.
2
2
hence no final decrease of its concentration was observed. As the
consequence, 1Pd025AuK2621 and 1Pd1AuK2621 were apprecia-
bly more selective than 1K2621 when t > 60 min. In this respect,
the plots in the upper panel of Fig. 6 show that the selectivity of
The bimetallic Pd-Au catalysts described herein are even more
different from those obtained with formaldehyde as the reducing
agent of the (same) metal precursors. In the latter case, the catalyst
with 0.25% (w/w) Au added was appreciably less active than
the related monometallic catalyst, but much more selective. By
contrast 1Pd025AuK2621 is more active than 1PdK2621, but only
slightly more selective. Moreover, in the formaldehyde reduced
catalysts the activity and the selectivity underwent a steady
increase and decrease, respectively, as the gold content was
increased. As shown above this was not the case with the catalysts
1
PdK2621 decreased faster than that of all the Pd-Au catalysts. The
result is that by the time that H O2 reached its respective top con-
2
centrations over 1PdK2621, 1Pd025AuK2621 and 1Pd1AuK2621,
the selectivity of the bimetallic catalysts had surpassed that of
the monometallic one. With the Pd-Au catalysts too there is not
a clear correlation between the size and size distribution of the
metal nanoparticles and the catalytic performance. Also in the case
of Pd-Au bimetallic catalysts obtained upon reduction of the metal
precursors with formaldehyde [9] we did not find compelling evi-
dence that the nanoparticle size was distinctly more important
than other factors in directing the catalysts’ performance, in spite
of the fact that they had sizes and size distributions pretty much
reduced with H described in this work. It is not clear at the moment
2
why different reducing agents give catalysts performing differ-
ently, starting from the same support and the same precursors.
TEM characterization did not provide useful information and again
the reasons could be connected to differences in the structures
of the metal nanoparticles, which could arise, for instance, from
different reduction rates of the precursors with different reducing
agents with different ability to diffuse inside the support [31].
different from those of the H -reduced catalysts investigated in the
2
present work. However, we argued there that the presence of large
aggregates could have beneficial effects on the selectivity [9].
This could help in explaining, at least in part, some differences
in the behavior of the Pd-Au catalysts obtained with H (this work)
4. Conclusion
2
and with formaldehyde [9] as the reducing agent. With the latter,
we observed a steady decrease of the initial selectivity with the
increase of the Au amount. In line with this, 1Pd05AuK2621 is also
less selective than 1Pd025AuK2621. The difference in selectivity
here is higher than in the case of the related catalysts from the
formaldehyde reduction route. Although we do not have XPS data
Two sets of bimetallic Pd-Pt (Pd: 1.0; Pt: 0.25–1.0%, w/w) and
Pd-Au (Pd: 1.0; Au: 0.25–1.0%, w/w) catalysts supported on the
suitable precursors and reduction under hydrogen pressure (5 bar)
Please cite this article in press as: S. Sterchele, et al., The effect of the metal precursor-reduction with hydrogen on a library of bimetallic
2
2