8728 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 105, No. 37, 2001
Hallock et al.
N2 itself does not adsorb on the Pt(100) face at room
temperature.21 King et al.23,24 demonstrated that the sticking
probability for N2 on Pt(100) is zero for translational energies
up to 3 eV, and they concluded that recombinative desorption
on Pt(100) proceeds directly through a late barrier, without
trapping and equilibration to the surface temperature. This
mechanism results in vibrationally excited gaseous N2. In
agreement with this mechanism, Foner et al.25 found evidence
for excitation up to V ) 9 for N2 recombination after NH3
dissociative adsorption on polycrystalline platinum.
Conclusions
Our study shows that the NO + H2 and NO + NH3 reactions
behave in similar fashions but they reach their respective final
states through different intermediates. We base this conclusion
on the different distributions of energies in the N2 product.
Traditional methods for probing surface chemistry are blind to
this type of effect. The precise mechanism accounting for the
different intermediates still needs clarification, but the measure-
ment of N2 product internal energy distributions for NO + H2
and NO + NH3 on Pt(100) shows unequivocally the need for
further study of these reaction systems.
Vibrationally excited N2 has been observed in recombination
reaction on several other metals like sulfur covered polycrys-
talline iron,26 on Cu(111),27 Ru(001),28 and Ag(111).29 In each
of these systems, the vibrational temperatures are much higher
than the surface temperature. The transition states of these
reactions must feature atoms that are separated by distances
greater than equilibrium bond length. Furthermore, the very large
vibrational spacing in the N2 molecule (approximately 2360
cm-1) precludes rapid equilibration with the surface.
Acknowledgment. C.M.M. thanks the Hertz-Foundation,
and F.B. thanks the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ba 1858/
1-1 and Ba 1858/1-2) for financial support. This study was
supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant.
CHE-9900305.
References and Notes
Because the N atoms are thought to recombine for both
precursors as they might do in a simple recombination scenario
we expected to observe vibrationally excited N2 product in the
NO + H2 and the NO + NH3 reactions. We also expected to
observe rotationally excited N2 products because of the large
nitrogen-nitrogen distance in the transition state. For the
reaction between NO and NH3 these expectation were met for
this case, but for NO + H2 surprisingly they were not. Instead
the N2 seems to be completely equilibrated (at least rotationally)
with the surface. We conclude that two different mechanisms
are operative but presently we can only speculate what might
be the reasons for this behavior. It is obvious that the source of
N atoms on the Pt surface can be different for both systems.
For NO + H2 the N atoms stem solely from dissociation of
NO, but for NO + NH3 two possible origins exist. Imbihl et
al.16 studied the NO + NH3 reaction via isotopically labeled
adducts and demonstrated that the desorbing N2 is produced
entirely from NO only for temperatures above 500 K. For lower
temperatures, N2 stems either from dissociated NH3 alone, or
from NO and NH3. For this reaction we only could take REMPI
spectra to a surface temperature of 485 K due to decreasing N2
production and increasing backgrounds. This means we probe
N2 that is made of at least one nitrogen from dissociated NH3,
not entirely from NO. Consequently, the possibility exists that
the N2 we observe comes from another reaction like Na + NOa
f N2,g + Oa, which would account for the different internal
state distribution. For N2 formation during NO reduction at Pd-
(110)30 these two N2 forming reactions have been identified to
lead to different angular distributions of desorbing N2 and to
different state distributions, although on Pt(335) Na + NOa has
not been seen.31 Another possibility could be that different
coverages of the surface with reaction adducts or intermediates
as NHx, structural surface defects especially in the vicinity of
(1) Bent, S. F.; Michelsen, H. A.; Zare, R. N. Laser Spectroscopy and
Photochemistry on Metal Surfaces; World Scientific: Singapore, 1995.
(2) Hodgson, A. Prog. Surf. Sci. 2000, 1, 63.
(3) Lesley, M. W.; Schmidt, L. D. Surf. Sci. 1985, 155, 215.
(4) Lombardo, S. J.; Fink, T.; Imbihl, R. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98,
5526.
(5) Ellison, M. D.; Matthews, C. M.; Zare, R. N. J. Chem. Phys. 2000,
112, 1975.
(6) Matthews, C. M.; Balzer, F.; Hallock, A. J.; Ellison, M. D.; Zare,
R. N. Surf. Sci. 2000, 12, 460.
(7) Kuhnke, K.; Kern, K.; Comsa, G.; Moritz, W. Phys. ReV. B 1992,
45, 14388.
(8) Ritz, G.; Schmid, M.; Varga, P.; Borg, A.; Ronning, M. Phys. ReV.
B 1997, 56, 10518.
(9) Norton, P. R.; Davies, J. A.; Creber, D. K.; Sitter, C. W.; Jackman,
T. E. Surf. Sci. 1981, 108, 205.
(10) Hagstrom, S.; Lyon, H. B.; Somorjai, G. A. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1965,
15, 491.
(11) Norton, P. R.; Griffiths, K.; Bindner, P. E. Surf. Sci. 1984, 138,
125.
(12) Lykke, K. R.; Kay, B. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 2252.
(13) Hanisco, T. F.; Kummel, A. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 8565.
(14) Zakheim, D. S.; Johnson, P. M. Chem. Phys. 1980, 46, 263.
(15) Bray, R. G.; Hochstrasser, R. M. Mol. Phys. 1976, 31, 1199.
(16) Lombardo, S. J.; Esch, F.; Imbihl, R. Surf. Sci. Lett. 1992, 271,
L367.
(17) Madden, H. H.; Imbihl, R. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1991, 48/49, 130.
(18) Slinko, M.; Fink, T.; Lo¨her, T.; Madden, H. H.; Lombardo, S. J.;
Imbihl, R.; Ertl, G. Surf. Sci. 1992, 264, 157.
(19) Fink, T.; Dath, J. P.; Bassett, M. R.; Imbihl, R.; Ertl, G. Surf. Sci.
1991, 245, 96.
(20) Ibach, H.; Lehwald, S. Surf. Sci. 1980, 91, 187.
(21) Schwaha, K.; Bechthold, E. Surf. Sci. 1977, 66, 383.
(22) Miners, J. H.; Gardner, P. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 10265.
(23) King, D. A. Faraday Discuss. 1993, 96, 79.
(24) Bradley, J. M.; Hopkinson, A.; King, D. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1995,
99, 17032.
(25) Foner, S. N.; Hudson, R. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 518.
(26) Thorman, R. P.; Bernasek, S. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 74, 6498.
(27) Murphy, M. J.; Skelly, J. F.; Hodgson, A. J. Chem. Phys. 1998,
109, 3619.
(28) Murphy, M. J.; Skelly, J. F.; Hodgson, A.; Hammer, B. J. Chem.
Phys. 1999, 110, 6954.
(29) Carter, R. N.; Murphy, M. J.; Hodgson, A. Surf. Sci. 1997, 387,
102.
(30) Haq, S.; Hodgson, A. Surf. Sci. 2000, 463, 1.
(31) Wang, H.; Tobin, R. G.; DiMaggio, C. L.; Fisher, G. B.; Lambert,
D. K. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 9569.
16
adduct islands or the formation of complexes like NOa-NHx,a
influence the height of the barrier to the Na+ Na recombination.
This second possibility cannot be ruled out but seems to be
less attractive than the first.