Angewandte Chemie International Edition
10.1002/anie.201803543
COMMUNICATION
Afterwards, the combined electrochemical results of CoSe
electrodes for overall water electrolysis in KOH with and without
hydrazine electrolyte are compared (Figure 4d). The comparable
2
Acknowledgements
This work is financial supported by National 1000 Young Talents
Program of China. The National Natural Science Foundation of
China (51702213), the Innovation Foundation of Shenzhen
Government (JCYJ20160408173202143), the Fundamental
Research Funds for the Central University (2017KFXKJC002 and
GK201602002), and the Innovation Research Funds of HUST
HER performance is observed for CoSe
2
electrodes, similar
potentials of -84 mV (with hydrazine) and -90 mV (without
hydrazine) vs. RHE are required to achieve a cathodic current
-2
density 10 mA cm . For the anodic oxidation, CoSe
2
electrode
exhibits an excellent oxygen evolution performance, 1.513 V vs.
RHE to achieve an anodic current density of 10 mA cm . But even
though, the full cell voltage of an assembled cell for water splitting
-2
(
2017KFYXJJ164) are also acknowledged. The authors also
acknowledge the support of the Analytical and Testing Center of
Huazhong University of Science and Technology for XRD, XRF,
ICP-OES, SEM, TEM, Raman, XPS and Nitrogen sorption
measurements.
by CoSe
to afford the considerable current density of 10 mA cm (Figure
S17, SI). However, CoSe electrodes demonstrates an impressive
electrochemical HzOR activity at -17 mV and 170 mV vs. RHE to
2 2
electrodes or Pt║IrO couple may be higher than 1.5 V
-2
2
-2
afford the anodic current density of 10 and 100 mA cm ,
respectively. It endows an ultralow voltage for a complete water
electrolysis assembled by anodic HzOR and cathodic HER. Such
a full cell design reveals that the sluggish anodic oxidation is
mainly responsible for the energy consumption for
electrochemical hydrogen production. Fortunately, the hydrazine
oxidation can replace the cathode water oxidation reaction, and
thus remarkably reduce the full cell voltage and achieve the
energy-saving purpose in water electrolysis technologies.
Keywords: Cobalt perselenide • Bifunctional electrocatalyst •
Hydrogen evolution • Hydrazine oxidation • Water electrolysis
[
1]
(a) S. Chu, A. Majumdar, Nature 2012, 488, 294-303; (b) B. Y. Xia,
Y. Yan, N. Li, H. B. Wu, X. W. D. Lou, X. Wang, Nat Energy 2016,
1, 15006; (c) N. Armaroli, V. Balzani, Angew Chem Int Ed 2007,
46, 52-66.
[
2]
K. K. Sakimoto, A. B. Wong, P. Yang, Science 2016, 351, 74-77.
(a) J. Liu, Y. Liu, N. Liu, Y. Han, X. Zhang, H. Huang, Y. Lifshitz, S.-
T. Lee, J. Zhong, Z. Kang, Science 2015, 347, 970-974; (b) C.
Tang, R. Zhang, W. Lu, L. He, X. Jiang, A. M. Asiri, X. Sun, Adv
Mater 2017, 29, 1602441.
(a) O. Khaselev, J. A. Turner, Science 1998, 280, 425-427; (b) J. A.
Turner, Science 2004, 305, 972-974; (c) X. Wang, K. Maeda, A.
Thomas, K. Takanabe, G. Xin, J. M. Carlsson, K. Domen, M.
Antonietti, Nat Mater 2009, 8, 76.
[3]
[4]
2
Moreover, the cathodic CoSe electrode displays a high hydrogen
production faradic efficiency of 98.3% (Figure 4e), suggesting the
complete electron utilization during the hydrogen production.
Figure 4f shows the potential response of two-electrode
[
5]
(a) Z. W. Seh, J. Kibsgaard, C. F. Dickens, I. Chorkendorff, J. K.
Nørskov, T. F. Jaramillo, Science 2017, 355, eaad4998; (b) Y. T.
Xu, X. Xiao, Z. M. Ye, S. Zhao, R. Shen, C. T. He, J. P. Zhang, Y.
Li, X. M. Chen, J Am Chem Soc 2017, 139, 5285-5288; (c) T. Liu,
L. Xie, J. Yang, R. Kong, G. Du, A. M. Asiri, X. Sun, L. Chen,
ChemElectroChem 2017, 4, 1840-1845.
(a) H. Wang, H.-W. Lee, Y. Deng, Z. Lu, P.-C. Hsu, Y. Liu, D. Lin, Y.
Cui, Nat Commun 2015, 6, 7261; (b) I. Roger, M. A. Shipman, M.
D. Symes, Nat Rev Chem 2017, 1, 0003.
(a) A. J. Esswein, Y. Surendranath, S. Y. Reece, D. G. Nocera,
Energy Environ Sci 2011, 4, 499-504; (b) S. Cobo, J. Heidkamp,
P.-A. Jacques, J. Fize, V. Fourmond, L. Guetaz, B. Jousselme, V.
Ivanova, H. Dau, S. Palacin, Nat Mater 2012, 11, 802; (c) J.
Staszak-Jirkovský, Christos D. Malliakas, Pietro P. Lopes, N.
Danilovic, Subrahmanyam S. Kota, K.-C. Chang, B. Genorio, D.
Strmcnik, Vojislav R. Stamenkovic, M. G. Kanatzidis, N. M.
Markovic, Nat Mater 2015, 15, 197; (d) C. You, Y. Ji, Z. Liu, X.
Xiong, X. Sun, ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2018, 6, 1527-1531.
X. Xiong, Y. Ji, M. Xie, C. You, L. Yang, Z. Liu, A. M. Asiri, X. Sun,
Electrochem Commun 2018, 86, 161-165.
HER/HzOR electrolyzer utilizing the bifunctional CoSe
2
electrode.
The paired CoSe electrode only requires 0.164 V to generate a
2
current density of 10 mA cm-2 for 14 hours stable hydrogen
production, which is very little value compared to the theoretically
thermodynamical potential of water splitting (1.23 V). Moreover,
vigorous gas bubbles are produced from the both electrodes
when the assembled cell is driven by a commercial 1.5 V AA
battery (Movie S3, SI), demonstrating the promising potential for
future practical application.
[6]
[
7]
In summary, we demonstrate an effective approach for energy-
efficient hydrogen production by a substituted anodic hydrazine
oxidation to replace the sluggish oxygen evolution based on a
bifunctional tubular CoSe
2
nanosheet electrode. In the presence
[
8]
of hydrazine, CoSe electrode exhibits an excellent activity even
2
better than Pt/C electrode, as evidenced by low potentials of -84
mV for HER and -17 mV for HzOR. The assembled HER/HzOR
electrolyzer system merely requires an ultralow voltage of 0.164
V to drive a current density of 10 mA cm-2 for hydrogen generation
during a stable 14h electrolysis operation. This work not only
provides an efficient and robust electrocatalyst for water splitting,
[9]
(a) Y. P. Zhu, T. Y. Ma, M. Jaroniec, S. Z. Qiao, Angew Chem Int
Ed 2017, 56, 1324-1328; (b) S.-H. Yu, C. Gu, S. Hu, X. Zheng, M.-
R. Gao, Y.-R. Zheng, L. Shi, Q. Gao, X. Zheng, W. Chu, Angew
Chem Int Ed 2018, 57, 1-6.
[10]
(a) J. Zhang, Z. Zhao, Z. Xia, L. Dai, Nat Nanotechnol 2015, 10,
444-452; (b) J. Pan, Y. Y. Xu, H. Yang, Z. Dong, H. Liu, B. Y. Xia,
Adv Sci 2018, 5, 1700691; (c) X. Xiong, C. You, Z. Liu, A. M. Asiri,
X. Sun, ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2018, 6, 2883-2887.
L. Zhou, M. Shao, C. Zhang, J. Zhao, S. He, D. Rao, M. Wei, D. G.
Evans, X. Duan, Adv Mater 2017, 29, 1604080.
C. Tang, R. Zhang, W. Lu, Z. Wang, D. Liu, S. Hao, G. Du, A. M.
Asiri, X. Sun, Angew Chem Int Ed 2017, 56, 842-846.
(a) T. Asset, A. Roy, T. Sakamoto, M. Padilla, I. Matanovic, K.
Artyushkova, A. Serov, F. Maillard, M. Chatenet, K. Asazawa,
Electrochim Acta 2016, 215, 420-426; (b) M. Sun, Z. Lu, L. Luo, Z.
Chang, X. Sun, Nanoscale 2016, 8, 1479-1484.
[
[
[
11]
12]
13]
but also delivers
a philosophy for the energy-saving full
electrolysis cell design by integrating both corresponding anodic
oxidation and cathodic reduction reactions, thus grasps great
potentials in the future energy conversion and storage
technologies, sustainable environmental issues and beyond.
[
14]
(a) M. A. Oturan, J.-J. Aaron, Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2014,
44, 2577-2641; (b) Y. Kuang, G. Feng, P. Li, Y. Bi, Y. Li, X. Sun,
Experimental Section
Angew Chem Int Ed 2016, 55, 693-697; (c) J. Huang, S. Zhao, W.
Chen, Y. Zhou, X. Yang, Y. Zhu, C. Li, Nanoscale 2016, 8, 5810-
5
814; (d) G. Feng, Y. Kuang, P. Li, N. Han, M. Sun, G. Zhang, X.
Experimental Details, DFT calculations, SEM, TEM, XPS, Raman and
other electrochemical measurements.
Sun, Adv Sci 2017, 4, 1600179.
(a) B. You, X. Liu, N. Jiang, Y. Sun, J Am Chem Soc 2016, 138,
[15]
13639-13646; (b) G. Yu, H. Wang, X.-B. Li, L. Gao, H.-L. Wu, J.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.