M.R. Majidi et al. / Electrochimica Acta 52 (2007) 6248–6253
6253
4. Conclusion
Glassy carbon electrode coated with overoxidized polypyr-
role film was used for electrocatalytic determination of HZ. It
was shown that HZ can be determined using the cyclic voltam-
metry and amperometry techniques on the basis of its oxidation
process at an overoxidation polypyrrole glassy carbon mod-
ified electrode. The overall number of electrons involved in
the oxidation of HZ, the number of electrons involved in the
rate-determining step and the diffusion coefficient of HZ were
calculated.
Acknowledgement
Fig. 9. Calibration plot for concentrations of HZ from cyclic voltammograms.
Financial support from the University of Tabriz is gratefully
acknowledged.
bubbles at the surface of the modifier. Indeed, at low substrate
concentrations, gas formation is negligible, and has no effect
on the diffusion of HZ towards the electrode surface. While, at
high concentrations of HZ, gas evolution at the electrode surface
slackened to some extent the normal diffusion of substrate.
Under the optimum conditions, peak currents of cyclic
voltammograms linearly depended on HZ concentrations. The
cyclic voltammograms at different concentrations of HZ are
shown in Fig. 8. A plot of the peak current values as a func-
tion of the concentration was drawn. The plot was linear in the
concentration range of 1.3 × 10−6 to 2.1 × 10−3 M HZ. For the
regression plot of the peak current versus HZ concentration,
the slope was 14.68 A mM−1, the y-intercept was 0.0036 A
and the correlation coefficient was R2 = 0.9992 (see Fig. 9). The
detection limit calculated from the calibration graph was 36 M
HZ [32].
The stability and reproducibility of the OPPy–GC electrode
was studied by cyclic voltammetry and repetitive amperome-
try. Fig. 10 shows the repetitive amperogram of the OPPy–GC
electrode kept in 450 and 0 mV in 0.1 M ammonium buffer
solution (pH 9) in five levels of HZ concentrations. Also five
modified electrodes were prepared and their cyclic voltammo-
grams were recorded at 0.5 mM HZ (pH 9). The R.S.D. for ip
and Ep of voltammograms were less than 4%. Above results
showed that the modified electrodes have good stability and
reproducibility.
References
[1] A. Ramanavicius, A. Ramanaviciene, A. Malinauskas, Electrochim. Acta
51 (2006) 6025.
[2] D.M.T. O’Riordan, G.G. Wallace, Anal. Chem. 58 (1986) 128.
[3] G.G. Wallace, Y.P. Lin, J. Electroanal. Chem. 247 (1988) 145.
[4] K.-K. Shiu, S.K. Pang, H.K. Cheung, J. Electroanal. Chem. 367 (1994)
115.
[5] K.-K. Shiu, O.Y. Chan, J. Electroanal. Chem. 388 (1995) 45.
[6] K.-.K. Shiu, O.Y. Chan, S.K. Pang, Anal. Chem. 67 (1995) 2828.
[7] P.N. Bartlett, J.M. Cooper, J. Electroanal. Chem. 362 (1993) 1.
[8] A.M. Farrington, J.M. Slater, Electroanalysis 9 (1997) 843.
[9] L. Spurlock, A. Jaramillo, A. Praserthdam, J. Lewis, A. Brajter-Toth, Anal.
Chim. Acta 336 (1996) 37.
ˆ
[10] J.C. Vidal, E. Garco˜Aa, J.R. Castillo, Anal. Chim. Acta 385 (1999) 213.
[11] S.M. Golabi, H.R. Zare, J. Electroanal. Chem. 465 (1999) 168.
[12] P. Ardiles, E. Trollund, M. Isaacs, F. Armijo, J.C. Canales a, M.J. Aguirre,
M.J. Canales, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 165 (2001) 169.
[13] S.M. Golabi, H.R. Zare, M. Hamzehloo, Microchem. J. 69 (2001) 111.
[14] J.M. Pingarro´n, I. Ortiz Herna´ndez, A. Gonza´lez-Corte´s, P. Ya´n˜ez-Seden˜o,
Anal. Chim. Acta 439 (2001) 281.
[15] Y.D. Zhao, W.D. Zhang, H. Chen, Q.M. Luo, Talanta 58 (2002) 529.
[16] M.H. Pournaghi-Azar, R. Sabzi, J. Electroanal. Chem. 543 (2003) 115.
[17] X. Li, S. Zhang, C. Sun, J. Electroanal. Chem. 553 (2003) 139.
[18] A. Abbaspour, M.A. Kamyabi, J. Electroanal. Chem. 576 (2005) 73.
[19] M. Revenga-Parra, E. Lorenzo, F. Pariente, Sens. Actuators B 107 (2005)
678.
[20] K.I. Ozoemena, T. Nyokong, Talanta 67 (2005) 162.
[21] A.A. Ensafi, E. Mirmomtaz, J. Electroanal. Chem. 583 (2005) 176.
[22] H.R. Zare, N. Nasirizadeh, Electrochim. Acta 52 (2007) 4153.
[23] H.M. Nassef, A.E. Radi, C.K. O’Sullivan, J. Electroanal. Chem. 592 (2006)
139.
[24] J.W. Mo, B. Ogorevc, X. Zhang, B. Pihlar, Electroanalysis 12 (2000) 48.
[25] A. Salimi, R. Hallaj, Electroanalysis 16 (2004) 1964.
[26] C.C. Yang, A.S. Kumara, M.C. Kuo, S.H. Chien, J.M. Zena, Anal. Chim.
Acta 554 (2005) 66.
[27] M.R. Majidi, A. Jouyban, K. Asadpour-Zeynali, J. Electroanal. Chem. 589
(2006) 32.
[28] A. Guerrieri, G.E. De Benedetto, F. Palmisano, P.G. Zambonin, Biosens.
Bioelectron. 13 (1998) 103.
[29] J. Wang, Q. Chen, G. Cepria, Talanta 43 (1996) 1387.
[30] A.J. Bard, L.R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods, Fundamentals and
Applications, Wiley, New York, 1980.
[31] F. Pariente, E. Lorenzo, F. Tobalina, H.D. Abruna, Anal. Chem. 67 (1995)
3936.
[32] J.C. Miller, J.N. Miller, Statistics for Analytical Chemistry, second ed.,
Prentice Hall, New York, 1994.
Fig. 10. Repetitive amperogram of the OPPy–GC electrode kept in 450 and
0 mV in 0.1 M ammonium buffer solution pH 9 containing (a) background; (b)
1.71; (c) 3.88; (d) 6.70; (e) 17.81 and (f) 28.15 M from HZ.