Journal of Natural Products
ARTICLE
Advantage Max mass detector and Thermo Scientific LTQ-XL Orbitrap
mass spectrometer, respectively. LCMS analysis was carried out on a
Finnigan LCQ Advantage Max spectrometer with a Finnigan Surveyor
HPLC system equipped with Thermo Finnigan Surveyor PDA plus
detector. HPLC was performed using a Waters 515 pump and a Waters
most parsimonious tree. Bootstrap support was obtained from 1000
replicates.
Isolation and Structure Elucidation. Biomass of each cyano-
bacterial specimen was extracted exhaustively with CH Cl /MeOH
2 2
(2:1). The extracts were fractionated by silica gel VLC using a stepwise
gradient from 100% hexanes to 100% MeOH in nine fractions (AꢀI) of
increasing polarity. VLC fractions were purified over a 500 mg C-18 Sep-
Pak followed by RP-HPLC (Phenomenex Jupiter 10 μm C18, 300 Å,
996 photodiode array detector.
Sampling and Taxonomic Characterization. Cyanobacterial
strains were collected by scuba or snorkeling from the following four
sites along the leeward coast of Cura c- ao, Netherlands Antilles: NAC8-45
10 ꢁ 250 mm, 85% CH
3 2
OH/H O at 3 mL/min). For MALDI-TOF-
MS, each specimen (5ꢀ10 μg wet wt) was extracted with 1 μg/μL of
0
0
(
Marie Pampoen; harbor inlet; 12ꢀ05 47.22 N, 68ꢀ54 54.54 W; 2ꢀ3 m
0
0
depth), NAC8-46 (Caracas baii; coral reef; 12ꢀ04 31.48 N, 68ꢀ51 49.37
matrix solution (70 mg/mL alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid and
2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (1:1), 750 μL of CH CN, 248 μL of dH O,
2 μL of trifluoroacetic acid) in 96-well plastic plates for 20ꢀ30 s.
One microliter of matrix extract was deposited on the well of a Bruker
Microflex MSP 96 stainless steel target plate and run on a Bruker
Microflex mass spectrometer equipped with flexControl 3.0.
Ethyl Tumonoate A (1): pale yellow oil; [R]
IR (neat) νmax 1733, 1630 cm ; H, C, and 2D NMR data, see
Table 2; HRESIMS m/z [M + Na] 390.2617 (calcd for C21H37NO
4
390.2620).
Absolute Configuration of the Proline Residue in Ethyl
Tumonoate A (1) by Marfey’s Method (ref 24). Ethyl tumonoate
A (100 μg) was treated with 100 μL of 6 N HCl at 110 ꢀC for 30 min.
The reaction products obtained following lyophilization of the crude
reaction mixture were dissolved in 100 μL of H
The dried hydrolysate was dissolved in 100 μL of 1 M NaHCO
0
W; 8ꢀ10 m depth), NAC8-54 (Pierbaai reef; coral reef; 12ꢀ05 40.07 N,
3 2
0
6
8ꢀ54 47.55 W; 8ꢀ10 m depth), and NAC8-55 (Jan Theil baii; coral
0
0
reef; 12ꢀ04 33.80 N, 68ꢀ52 54.55 W; 3ꢀ4 m depth). Specimens were
cleaned from macroflora/fauna under a dissecting scope. Algal tissue (ca.
200 mg) was preserved for genetic analysis in 10 mL of RNAlater
2
5
(
Ambion), for chemical analysis in seawater/EtOH (1:1) at ꢀ20 ꢀC, and
D
ꢀ77.5 (c 1.0, CHCl
3
);
ꢀ1
1
13
in seawater filtered through 0.2 μm Acrodisc Syringe filters (PALL Life
Sciences) for culturing and morphological analysis. Morphological
characterizations were performed using an Olympus IX51 epifluorescent
microscope (100ꢁ) equipped with an Olympus U-CMAD3 camera.
Taxonomic identification of cyanobacterial specimens was performed in
+
Na,
10,17
accordance with modern phycological systems.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Cloning. Genomic
DNA was extracted using the Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit
O and relyophilized.
, and
2
(
Promega Inc.) following the manufacturer’s specifications. DNA con-
centration and purity were measured on a DU 800 spectrophotometer
Beckman Coulter). The 16S rRNA genes were PCR-amplified from
isolated DNA using the cyanobacteria-specific primers 106F and 1509R,
3
then 25 μL of 1% L-FDVA (1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrophenyl-5-L-valine amide)
in acetone was added. The solution was vortexed and incubated at 40 ꢀC
for 60 min. The reaction was quenched by the addition of 25 μL of 2 N
HCl and diluted with 100 μL of MeOH, and then a 10 μL aliquot was
analyzed by LC-MS using the following RP-HPLC conditions: [HP
Lichrosphere 100 RP-18 column, 5.0 μm, 4.0 ꢁ 125 mm, with a stepped
(
30
as previously described. The PCR reaction volumes were 25 μL
containing 0.5 μL (∼50 ng) of DNA, 2.5 μL of 10 ꢁ PfuUltra IV
reaction buffer, 0.5 μL (25 mM) of dNTP mix, 0.5 μL of each primer
(10 μM), 0.5 μL of PfuUltra IV fusion HS DNA polymerase, and 20.5 μL
gradient elution of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid in H
CH
2
O (eluent A) and 100%
of dH O. The PCR reactions were performed in an Eppendorf Master-
2
3
CN (eluent B); gradient program 0ꢀ5 min, B, 30%, 5ꢀ25 min; B,
cycler gradient as follows: initial denaturation for 2 min at 95 ꢀC, 25
cycles of amplification (20 s at 95 ꢀC, 20 s at 50 ꢀC, and 1.5 min at
30ꢀ70%, flow rate, 500 μL/min]. The Marfey derivatives of authentic
D- and L-Pro eluted at 15.88 and 13.74 min, respectively. The Marfey
derivative from acid hydrolysates of 1 was eluted at 13.47 min, and co-
injection with the authentic L-Pro derivative gave a single peak.
72 ꢀC), and final elongation for 3 min at 72 ꢀC. PCR products were
purified using a MinElute PCR purification kit (Qiagen) before sub-
cloned using the Zero Blunt TOPO PCR cloning kit (Invitrogen)
following the manufacturer’s specifications. Plasmid DNA was isolated
using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep kit (Qiagen) and sequenced with M13
primers. The gene sequences are available in the DDBJ/EMBL/Gen-
Bank databases under acc. nos. GU724196, GU724197, GU724207, and
GU724208.
Absolute Configuration of the 3-Hydroxy Group of Ethyl
Tumonoate A (1) by Mosher’s Method (ref 25). Dried com-
pound 1 (1 mg) was dissolved in 200 μL of anhydrous pyridine, and a
catalytic amount of DMAP (4-dimethylaminopyridine) and an excess
amount of (R)-MTPA-Cl were added. The reaction vial was maintained
at room temperature for 24 h, and the reaction progress was monitored
by normal-phase thin-layer chromatography (NP TLC). The (S)-
MTPA ester of 1 was isolated by preparative NP TLC with a developing
solvent of hexanes/EtOAc (1:1) and an eluent of 100% EtOAc. Using
the same procedure with (S)-MTPA-Cl, the (R)-MTPA ester of 1 was
also obtained. The absolute configuration of the 3-hydroxy group was
Phylogenetic Inference. Gene sequences were aligned bidirec-
tionally using the L-INS-i algorithm in MAFFT 6.717. A total of 1378 bp
(310 parsimony informative sites) of the 16S rRNA gene were analyzed
without data exclusion. The evolutionary distant unicellular cyanobac-
T
terium Gloeobacter violaceus PCC 7421 (NC005125) was included as
T
1
an outgroup. Representative type-strains ( ) were selected from Bergey’s
determined by H NMR analysis of the (R)/(S)-MTPA esters (see
17
Manual. Phylogenetic analyses were compared using the maximum
likelihood, Bayesian inference, and maximum parsimony methods.
Appropriate nucleotide substitution models were compared and se-
lected using uncorrected/corrected Akaike information criterion (AIC/
AICc), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and the decision-theoretic
Supporting Information).
3-(S)-MTPA ester of ethyl tumonoate A (1): pale yellow oil; H
1
3 H
NMR (CDCl , 600 MHz) δ 5.79 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz, H-5), 5.61 (1H, d,
0
0
0
J = 10.6 Hz, H-3), 4.15 (2H, m, H-1 ), 4.14 (1H, m, H-2 ), 3.56 (1H, m,
0
0
H-5 a), 3.47 (1H, m, H-5 b), 2.96 (1H, dq, J = 10.6, 6.9 Hz, H-2), 2.07
0
0
(
DT) in jModelTest 0.1.1. Bayesian analysis was conducted using
(2H, m, H-6), 1.94 (1H, m, H-4 a), 1.93 (1H, m, H-3 a), 1.86 (1H, m,
31
0
0
MrBayes 3.1. The AIC1, AIC2, DIC, and BIC criteria all selected
GTR+I+G as the optimum model. The Markov chains, one cold and
three heated, were run for 3 000 000 generations. The maximum like-
lihood inference was performed using PhyML v2.4.4. The analysis was
run using the GTR+I+G model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The
maximum parsimony analysis was performed in PAUP* 4.0b10 using a
heuristic search through the branch-swapping tree-bisection-reconnec-
tion algorithm with the addition of 10 000 random replicates to find the
H-3 b), 1.77 (1H, m, H-4 b), 1.64 (3H, s, 4-Me), 1.37 (2H, dd, J = 13.3,
6.9 Hz, H-7), 1.32ꢀ1.21 (8H, m, H-8, H-9, H-10, H-11), 1.25 (3H, t,
0
0
J = 7.1 Hz, H-2 ), 1.01 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2-Me), 0.87 (3H, t, J = 7.1 Hz,
32
+
+
3H); LR ESIMS m/z 583.94 [M + H] , 606.17 [M + Na] .
3-(R)-MTPA Ester of Ethyl Tumonoate A (1): pale yellow oil;
H NMR (CDCl , 600 MHz) δ 5.72 (1H, t, J = 6.9 Hz, H-5), 5.50 (1H,
3 H
1
0
00
d, J = 10.6 Hz, H-3), 4.36 (1H, dd, J = 7.9 Hz, H-2 ), 4.18 (2H, m, H-1 ),
0
0
3.59 (1H, m, H-5 a), 3.52 (1H, m, H-5 b), 2.95 (1H, dq, J = 10.7, 6.9 Hz,
1
741
dx.doi.org/10.1021/np200236c |J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 1737–1743