3
26
B.G. Bazarov et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 448 (2008) 325–330
eutectic systems, to be revealed. The revealed quasi-binary sections were inves-
tigated with stepsof5–10 mol%. The samples for the investigationwereprepared
3.3. Tl2MoO4–AMoO4 systems
◦
◦
by solid-phase synthesis. They were annealed from 350 C up to 500–550 C
for 100–150 h. Equilibration was controlled by X-ray diffraction.
The X-ray powder diffraction (XPD) analysis was carried out using an
Advance D8 diffractometer (Cu K␣ radiation). The unit-cell parameters were
refined using uniquely indexed lines of X-ray powder diffraction patterns (Poly-
crystal software [9]).
There are no compounds in the Tl2МоO4–CaМоO4 and
Tl2МоO4–SrМоO4 systems [11]. In the Tl2МоO4–BaМоO4
and Tl2МоO4–PbМоO4 systems, double molybdates of com-
positions Tl2Ba(MoO4)2 and Tl2Pb(MoO4)2 were found. These
compounds crystallize in the trigonal crystal system and are thus
isostructural to their potassium analogues.
A Tl5Pb0.5Hf1.5(MoO4)6 single crystal was grown by flux crystallization
with spontaneous nucleation and characterized by X-ray structural analysis
◦
(
XSA). The flux used for this purpose was Tl2Mo4O13 (tm = 616 C). Single
crystals were grown from a melt containing 33.3 wt.% Tl5Pb0.5Hf1.5(MoO4)6
3.4. Tl MoO –Hf(MoO ) system
2
4
4 2
◦
and 66.7 wt.% Tl2Mo4O13. The melt obtained was annealed at 700 C for
◦
◦
homogenization, and then cooled down to 500 C at a rate of 1.5 C/h.
In other to conduct the XSA, a colourless single crystal was investigated
According to previous results [12], there are two
compounds, Tl8Zr(MoO4)6 and Tl2Zr(MoO4)3, in the
Tl2MoO4–Hf(MoO4)2 binary system. These compounds are
isostructural to their rubidium analogues and crystallize in the
monoclinic crystal system.
◦
using a X8 APEX (Mo K␣ radiation, graphite monochromator, max. 2θ = 65 )
autodiffractometer. The structure-refinement calculations were performed using
the SHELX-97 program complex [10].
The differential thermal analysis (DTA) was carried out using a thermoan-
alytical set-up that allowed us to record heating (cooling) curves and to reveal
◦
DTA peaks up to 1000 C. The temperature was measured using a Pt–Pt/10%
Rh thermocouple, whose hot junction was placed into the thermowell of a quartz
crucible with a sample, while the cold junctions were thermostatted at 0 C. The
3.5. New Tl5A0.5Hf1.5(MoO4)6 compounds
◦
sample size was 0.1–0.3 g. Heating was carried out from room temperature to
As shown in Fig. 1, new triple molybdates of composition
5:1:3 were obtained in the given systems. The stoichiomet-
ric correlation of the initial components for the synthesis of
these new compounds was taken from existing data [1–8].
The compounds obtained are isostructural and belong to
the trigonal crystal system. Isostructural phases of the same
composition were also observed in the zirconium systems
◦
◦
1
±
000 C at a rate of 10 C/min. The temperature measurement was accurate to
10 C.
◦
Infrared (IR) spectra of the polycrystalline samples were measured in a field
−1
of 1000–400 cm with a Scimitar FTS 2000 spectrometer. The samples were
pressed into tablets with KBr. Raman spectra were registered on a Triplemate
Spex spectrometer. The wavelength of the excitation was 488 nm.
The density of the samples was measured pycnometrically in carbon tetra-
chloridebythestandardprocedure. Thepycnometervolumewas5 ml, thesample
◦
Tl MoO –AMoO –Zr(MoO ) (A = Ca, Sr, Pb).
weight was 0.5 g, and the temperature was maintained at 26 C.
2
4
4
4 2
As
a
result of XSA, the composition of the
compound is confirmed.
Tl Pb0.5Hf1.5(MoO4)6
5
3
. Results and discussion
¯
Tl Pb0.5Hf1.5(MoO4)6 crystallizes in the R3 trigonal space
5
group with the unit-cell parameters a = b = 10.6830(3),
3
.1. Subsolidus phase relations
3
3
˚
˚
c = 38.599(2)A, V = 3815.0(2)A , Z = 6andρ = 6.145 g/cm .
calc
According to the results of the XPD analysis, the subsolidus
The melting point of this compound was determined to be
570 C by DTA.
◦
phase relations in the Tl2MoO4–AMoO4–Hf(MoO4)2 (A = Ca,
Sr, Ba, Pb) systems are as shown in Fig. 1. Triple molybdates
with a 5:1:3 (S) mole ratio of starting reactants are formed in
these systems. The amount of three-phase regions in these sys-
tems depends on the number of double and triple molybdates
obtained, and varies within the range 5–6.
The crystal structure of the Tl5Pb0.5Hf1.5(MoO4)6 (I) molyb-
date consists of two kinds of consecutively alternating Mo
tetrahedrons and Pb and Hf octahedrons, connecting through
shared O-tops. Three kinds of thallium cations are situated in the
large cavities of the framework. A projection of this structure on
the plane (1 1 0) is shown in Fig. 2.
In the crystal structure of Tl Pb0.5Hf (MoO4) , both kinds
3
.2. AMoO4–Hf(MoO4)2 systems
5
1.5
6
of the somewhat distorted MoO4 tetrahedra are characterized by
˚
We investigated these systems by XPD analysis. They are
Mo–O distances within the ranges 1.74–1.83 and 1.71–1.81 A,
eutectic systems, and no double molybdates are formed at
respectively. The significant scatter of Mo–O distances is
accounted for by the different coordinations of oxygen atoms
◦
5
50–600 C.
Fig. 1. The subsolidus phase relations in the Tl2MoO4–AMoO4–Hf(MoO4)2 (A = Ca, Sr, Ba, Pb) systems.