than that of the corresponding amine for equal values of
hydrogen-bonding equilibrium constant.36 Moreover, the data
reported by Abraham et al. demonstrate that DMSO forms
stronger hydrogen-bonds than the much more basic pyridine
derivatives.37
Coupled electronÈproton movement was suggested to
promote the radiationless deactivation when a heterocyclic
molecule containing an aromatic p-electronic system is con-
nected to excited hydroxyarenes directly via a hydrogen-
bond.10 The extremely weak Ñuorescence for the
hydrogen-bonded complexes of benzoxazole and pyridine
with hydroxy-naphthalimides is probably due to a rapid inter-
nal conversion via a similar process. The proton shift toward
the hydrogen-bond acceptor induces efficient nonradiative
energy dissipation. However, the intensive emission as well as
the long lifetime (ca. 4È9 ns) of the excited hydrogen-bonded
complexes containing imidazole and pyrazole obviously indi-
Fig. 8 Fluorescence spectra of 3-HONI in the presence of 0.024 M
imidazole: (A) in CH Cl , (B) in CH Cl ] 0.17 M EtOH, (C) in the
2
2
2 2
presence of 0.052 M imidazole in acetonitrile and (D) in ethyl acetate.
cate slow internal conversion (k value of ca. 108 s~1 can be
IC
deduced from the experimental data). We did not Ðnd a corre-
lation between the aromaticity index of the hydrogen-bond
acceptor and the radiationless deactivation rate of the excited
hydrogen-bonded complex. This seems to indicate that the
energy dissipation mechanism suggested for the excited
hydroxyareneÈpyridine species does not play a dominant role
if other types of nitrogen heterocyclics serve as the hydrogen-
bond acceptor.
Comparison of the e†ects of the various hydrogen-bond
acceptors. It was demonstrated that the intermolecular
hydrogen-bonding with alcohols in the singlet excited state
acts as an e†ective accepting mode of radiationless deactiva-
tion for aromatic carbonyl compounds.2h6 We should
comment on the question of why hydroxy-naphthalimides,
which also contain carbonyl groups, are not quenched by the
strong hydrogen-bond donor TFE. For the example of 2-
substituted Ñuorenones we demonstrated that efficient
hydrogen-bonding induced internal conversion can occur only
if the carbonyl oxygen has high electron density in the excited
state.30 As stated above, the absorption and the Ñuorescence
spectra of hydroxy-naphthalimides exhibit small solvatochro-
mic shifts because excitation leads to minor change in the
dipole moment. Theoretical calculations also corroborated
that there is no signiÐcant di†erence in the electron density of
the carbonyl oxygen for the S and the S states of naphthali-
Acknowledgements
We very much appreciate the support of this work by the
Hungarian Science Foundation (OTKA, Grant T 023428) and
the scientiÐc exchange program between the French Ministry
of Foreign A†airs and the Hungarian Committee for Techno-
logical Development (Balaton Project F-10/97).
References
0
1
mides,12,31 therefore, hydrogen-bonding with TFE does not
accelerate the internal conversion process.
1
2
3
J. Herbich, C.-Y. Hung, R. P. Thummel and J. Waluk, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 3508 and references therein.
H. Inoue, M. Hida, N. Nakashima and K. Yoshihara, J. Phys.
Chem., 1982, 86, 3184.
Table 2 lists the hydrogen-bonding equilibrium constants
and the quenching rate constants obtained by di†erent
methods. The proton affinities32 and the Bird aromaticity
indices33 for the quenchers are also included. Katritzky et al.
showed that the Bird aromaticity index is the best measure of
the classical aromaticity,34 therefore, we chose this among the
various aromaticity parameters available in the literature. The
rate constant of the excited hydroxy-naphthalimide quenching
varies remarkably with the molecular structure of the
hydrogen-bond acceptor; no quenching takes place with iso-
xazole but the reaction is di†usion controlled in the case of
imidazole. A parallel change can be seen between the proton
R. S. Moog, N. A. Burozski, M. M. Desai, W. R. Good, C. D.
Silvers, P. A. Thompson and J. D. Simon, J. Phys. Chem., 1991,
95, 8466; J. Ritter, H. U. Borst, T. Lindner, M. Hauser, S. Brosig,
K. Bredereck, U. E. Steiner, D. Kuhn, J. Kelemen and H. E. A.
Kramer, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 1988, 41, 227; H. U. Borst, J.
Kelemen, J. Fabian, M. Nepras and H. E. A. Kramer, J. Photo-
chem. Photobiol. A, 1992, 69, 97.
4
L. Biczok, T. Berces and H. Linschitz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 11071.
5
6
T. Yatsuhashi and H. Inoue, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1997, 101, 8166.
T. Yatsuhashi, Y. Nakajima, T. Shimada, H. Tachibana and H.
Inoue, J. Phys. Chem. A, 1998, 102, 8657.
affinity and the k rate constants throughout the series of the
7
8
9
C. Turro, C. K. Chang, G. E. Leroi, R. I. Cukier and D. G.
Nocera, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 4013.
q
quenchers shown in Table 2. The reactants that have low
R. I. Cukier and D. G. Nocera, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 1998, 49,
proton affinity do not promote the deactivation of the singlet
excited hydroxy-naphthalimides. The hydrogen-bonding
power of the additives, as measured directly by the ground
state hydrogen-bonding equilibrium constants (K), does not
play a rate determining role because no correlation can be
337.
W. J. Liegh, E. C. Lathioor and M. J. St Pierre, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1996, 118, 12339.
10 N. Mataga and H. Miyasaka, Prog. React. Kinet., 1994, 19, 317
and references therein.
11 H. Miyasaka, K. Wada, S. Ojima and N. Mataga, Isr. J. Chem.,
found between the K and k quantities. For example, DMSO
q
1993, 33, 183.
does not quench the Ñuorescence of hydroxy-naphthalimides
12 V. Wintgens, P. Valat, J. Kossanyi, A. Demeter, L. Biczok and T.
Berces, New J. Chem., 1996, 20, 1149.
in spite of the fairly large hydrogen-bonding equilibrium con-
stant in the ground state. These results suggest that proton
displacement plays a crucial role in the interaction of excited
hydroxy-naphthalimides and hydrogen-bond acceptors.
It is not surprising that no correlation appears between the
ground state hydrogen-bonding equilibrium constants and the
proton affinities listed in Table 2. Gurka and Taft established
that hydrogen-bonding and basicity are unrelated.35 For
example, using a common hydrogen-bond donor, they showed
13 L. M. Tolbert and J. E. Haubrich, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112,
8163.
14 L. M. Tolbert and J. E. Haubrich, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116,
10593.
15 D. Huppert, L. M. Tolbert and S. Linares-Samaniego, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 1997, 101, 4602.
16 V. Wintgens, P. Valat, J. Kossanyi, L. Biczok, A. Demeter and T.
Berces, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans., 1994, 90, 411.
17 W. Adam, X. Quian and C. R. Saha-Moller, T etrahedron, 1993,
49, 417.
that the pK of a carbonyl compound is 13 powers of ten less
a
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999, 1, 4759È4766
4765