ORGANIC
LETTERS
2
002
Vol. 4, No. 8
287-1289
Synthesis of Disubstituted
Cucurbit[6]uril and Its Rotaxane
Derivative
1
Hiroyuki Isobe, Sota Sato, and Eiichi Nakamura*
Department of Chemistry, The UniVersity of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Hongo,
Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Received February 20, 2002
ABSTRACT
Synthesis of diphenyl cucurbit[6]uril (CB[6]) has been achieved via co-oligomerization of diphenyl glycoluril and unsubstituted glycoluril. The
unsymmetrically substituted CB[6], Ph CB[6], was further converted to a rotaxane incorporating bis(dinitrophenyl)spermine.
2
6
Almost a century has passed since the first synthesis of
cucurbit[n]uril (CB[n]) was reported.1,2 CB[n] is a cyclic
oligomer of n units of glycoluril (GU, 4) linked by 2n
methylene bridges derived from formaldehyde. Several
symmetrical homologues of CB[n] have been synthesized
by homo-oligomerization of unsubstituted GU 4 or substi-
use in molecular machines. Our interest in the development
of chemical substances that control biological activities
7
,8
through DNA targeting directed us to investigate the
synthesis of substituted CB[6]. After unsuccessful attempts
to synthesize the cyclic homohexamer, dodecasubstituted
CB[6], from disubstituted GU, we envisioned that the
persubstituted homohexamer may suffer from steric strain
between substituents. Indeed, recently Kim showed that
although a symmetrical persubstituted CB[6] is obtainable
in a certain case, the yield of the product is far less than
satisfactory. In addition, it has not been demonstrated
whether this cyclic homo-oligomer can form a rotaxane by
inclusion of a polyamine molecule. As the result of extensive
optimization studies, we found that the disubstituted cyclic
hexamer forms more readily than unsubstituted CB[6]. We
report herein the first synthesis of unsymmetrically substi-
3
,4
tuted GU. Cyclic hexamer CB[6] (1, n ) 6, R ) H) is
uniquely important because of its ability to take up a
molecule of linear polyamine in the internal cavity. The result
is the formation of pseudorotaxane,2 which is interesting
not only purely for its intriguing shape but also for possible
,5
4
b
(
1) Behrend, R.; Meyer, E.; Rusche, F. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1905, 339,
1
-37.
(
2) (a) Freeman, W. A.; Mock, W. L.; Shih, N.-Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1
981, 103, 7367-7368. (b) Mock, W. L. In ComprehensiVe Supramolecular
Chemistry; V o¨ gtle, F., Ed.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1996; Vol. 2, p 477.
(3) (a) Kim, J.; Jung, I.-S.; Kim, S.-Y.; Lee, E.; Kang, J.-K.; Sakamoto,
S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kim, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 540-541. (b)
Day, A. I.; Blanch, R. J.; Arnold, A. P.; Lorenzo, S.; Lewis, G. R.; Dance,
I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 275-277.
(6) Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 409-522 (Molecular Machines special
issue).
(7) Isobe, H.; Tomita, N.; Lee, J. W.; Kim, K.; Nakamura, E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4257-4260.
(8) (a) Nakamura, E.; Isobe, H.; Tomita, N.; Sawamura, M.; Jinno, S.;
Okayama, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4254-4257. (b) Isobe, H.;
Sugiyama, S.; Fukui, K.-i.; Iwasawa, Y.; Nakamura, E. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2001, 40, 3364-3367. (c) Isobe, H.; Tomita, N.; Jinno, S.; Okayama,
H.; Nakamura, E. Chem. Lett. 2001, 1214-1215.
(
4) (a) Flinn, A.; Hough, G. C.; Stoddart, J. F.; Williams, D. J. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 1475-1477. (b) Zhao, J.; Kim, H.-J.; Oh,
J.; Kim, S.-Y.; Lee, J. W.; Sakamoto, S.; Yamaguchi, K.; Kim, K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4233-4235.
(
04.
5) Jeon, Y.-M.; Whang, D.; Kim, J.; Kim, K. Chem. Lett. 1996, 503-
5
1
0.1021/ol025749o CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 03/16/2002