Page 3 of 4
RSC Advances
DOI: 10.1039/C4RA16479B
In conclusion, we have successfully developed a simple
naphthaleneꢀbased fluorescense probe for Hg2+ based on
mercury triggered cleavage reaction under mild conditions.
35 The probe has the unique advantage of easyꢀpreparation, good
water solubility, and excellent selectivity and sensitivity
response towards Hg2+ in aqueous solution. We anticipate that
the experimental results of this study will inspire the future
design of metalꢀion sensors in water for a variety of chemical
40 and biological applications.
800
600
400
200
0
This work was supported by the Zhejiang Provincial
Natural Science Foundation of China (LY14B020016 and
LQ13B020006) and the Program for Innovative Research
45 Team of Zhejiang SciꢀTech University (13060052ꢀY).
Fig. 4 Fluorescence responses of MS1 to various metal ions. Black bars
represent the addition of 5.0 equiv. of Hg2+ and 10.0 equiv. of the other
appropriate metal ion to a 10 ꢀM solution of MS1. Red bars represent the
addition of 5.0 equiv. of Hg2+ to the solutions containing MS1 (10 ꢁM)
and the appropriated metals (10.0 equiv.).
Notes and references
5
Department of Chemistry, The Key Laboratory of Advanced Textile
Materials and Manufacturing Technology, Zhejiang SciꢁTech University,
50 Hangzhou, 310018, China.
Eꢁmail: zstuchem@gmail.com; Tel: +86ꢁ571ꢁ86843550;
Eꢁmail: xiamin@zstu.edu.cn.
competing ions (Fig. 4). Therefore, these results suggest that
MS1 displays high selectivity toward Hg2+ in neutral aqueous
solution.
10
Moreover, the Hg2+ꢀsensing ability of MS1 at a wide range
of pH values was investigated. As depicted in Fig. 5, MS1
alone is inert to pH in the range of 4.0ꢀ11.0. But in the
presence of Hg2+, MS1 have no fluorescence response in the
highly basic environment (pH ≥ 9) due to the reaction rate of
† Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Experimental
55 details, synthetic details of MS1, additional spectroscopic data, and copies
of NMR spectra. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
1
(a) L. Magos, Met. Ions Biol. Syst., 1997, 34, 321ꢀ370; (b) M. F.
Wolfe, S. Schwarzbach and R. A. Sulaiman, Environ. Toxicol.
Chem., 1998, 17, 146ꢀ160; (c) P. B. Tchounwou, W. K. Ayensu, N.
Ninashvili and D. Sutton, Environ. Toxicol., 2003, 18, 149ꢀ175; (d)
P. Grandjean, P. Weihe, R. F. White and F. Debes, Environ. Res.,
1998, 77, 165ꢀ172.
15 mercury ionꢀpromoted hydrolysis of vinyl enol ether becomes
slow at high pH value.6 However, satisfactory Hg2+ꢀsensing
abilities were exhibited in the range of pH from 4.0 to 8.0,
indicating that MS1 could be used in neutral natural systems,
or a mildly acidic or basic environment.
20 For practical purposes, the detection limit of MS1 for the
analysis of Hg2+ was also an important parameter. The
fluorescence titration curve revealed that the fluorescence
intensity of MS1 at 470 nm increased linearly with the amount
of Hg2+ in the range of 0ꢀ5.0 ꢀM (R2 = 0.994) (Fig. S1, ESI†).
25 Thus, the detection limit of MS1 for Hg2+ was calculated to be
4.31×10ꢀ8 M (Hg content = 8.8 ppb), which reveals the high
sensitivity for the analysis of the mercury ions.
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
2
(a) C. R. Baum, Curr. Opin. Pediatr., 1999, 11, 265ꢀ268; (b) E. K.
Silbergeld, I. A. Silva and J. F. Nyland, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.,
2005, 207, S282ꢀS292; (c) R. K. Zalups and S. Ahmad, J. Am. Soc.
Nephrol., 2004, 15, 2023ꢀ2031; (d) Z. Zhang, X. Guo, X. Qian, Z.
Lu and F. Liu, Kidney Int., 2004, 66, 2279ꢀ2282; (e) J. Huang, X.
Ma, B. Liu, L. Cai, Q. Li, Y. Zhang, K. Jiang and S. Yin, J. Lumin.,
2013, 141, 130ꢀ140.
3
(a) M. Y. Berezin and S. Achilefu, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 2641ꢀ
2684; (b) K. P. Carter, A. M. Young and A. E. Palmer, Chem.
Rev., 2014, 114, 4564ꢀ4601; (c) E. M. Nolan and S. J. Lippard,
Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3443ꢀ3480; (d) X. Chen, T. Pradhan, F.
Wang, J. S. Kim and J. Yoon, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1910ꢀ1956;
(e) M. Kaur and D. H. Choi, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 58ꢀ77; (f)
Z. Guo, S. Park, J. Yoon and I. Shin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 16ꢀ
29; (g) L. Yuan, W. Lin, K. Zheng, L. He and W. Huang, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 622ꢀ661; (h) J. Fan, M. Hu, P. Zhan and X.
Peng, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 29ꢀ43; (i) J. Du, M. Hu, J. Fan and
X. Peng, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 4511ꢀ4535; (j) W. Xuan, C.
Chen, Y. Cao, W. He, W. Jiang, K. Liu and W. Wang, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 7292ꢀ7294; (k) M. Vedamalai and S. P. Wu,
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 5410ꢀ5416; (l) J. Liu, Y. Q. Sun, P.
Wang, J. Zhang and W. Guo, Analyst, 2013, 138, 2654ꢀ2660; (m) F.
Song, S. Watanabe, P. E. Floreancig, and K. Koide, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2008, 130, 16460ꢀ16461; (n) H. Jiang, J. Jiang, J. Cheng, W.
Dou, X. Tang, L. Yang, W. Liu and D. Bai, New J.Chem., 2014, 38,
109ꢀ114; (o) L. Chen, L. Yang, H. Li, Y. Gao, D. Deng, Y. Wu and
L. Ma, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50, 10028ꢀ10032; (p) M. Saleem, R.
Abdullah, A. Ali, B. J. Park, E. H. Choi, I. S. Hong and K. H. Lee,
Anal. Methods, 2014, 6, 3588ꢀ3597.
MS1
MS1+Hg2+
800
600
400
200
0
4
6
8
10
12
pH
4
(a) M. Tian and H. Ihmels, Chem. Commun., 2009, 3175ꢀ3177; (b)
N. Kumari, N. Dey, S. Jha and S. Bhattachary, ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces, 2013, 5, 2438ꢀ2445; (c) S. Madhu, R. Kalaiyarasi, S. K.
Basu, S. Jadhav and M. Ravikanth, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2014, 2,
30 Fig. 5 Effect of the pH on the fluorescence emission of MS1 (10 ꢀM)
alone and MS1 (10 ꢀM) reacted with Hg2+ (3.0 equiv.).
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry [year]
Journal Name, [year], [vol], 00–00 | 3