Organic Letters
Letter
alized tetrasubstituted difluoroalkyl allenes using easily
available reaction partners is highly desirable.
a
Among the established methods to construct allenes, the
direct transformation of propargylic alcohols or their
derivatives represents one of the most efficient approaches
6
with great successes achieved. Great efforts have been devoted
to the preparation of challenging multisubstituted allene
derivatives by trapping the in-situ-generated allenic carboca-
tion intermediates from propargylic alcohols with different
7
types of nucleophiles. Usually, stronger nucleophiles are
b
yield (%)
required to inhibit the Meyer−Schuster rearrangement
7
a
byproduct. In sharp contrast, no attempt has been made
for the synthesis of multisubstituted fluorinated allenes with
fluorinated nucleophiles, which is mainly due to their relatively
low electron density and poor nucleophilicity. Therefore, the
rearrangement side reaction must be efficiently suppressed to
successfully obtain the targeted fluorinated allene product. In
our recent studies, we found for the first time that
hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) could act as an ideal catalyst
to form the fluorinated carbon−carbon bond with high
entry
catalyst
solvent
time (h)
3a
46
4a
39
29
34
42
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Cu(OTf)2
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
DCM
HFIP
DCE
12
12
12
12
12
12
24
48
48
48
48
48
BF ·OEt2
21
28
33
31
86
48
37
32
19
trace
0
3
A
B
C
HFIP
TFE
D
53
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
d
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
8
efficiency. Inspired by this interesting investigation, along
9
E
F
with our continuing interest in developing new strategies for
10
11
12
9
the synthesis of fluorine-containing molecules, we envisioned
G
PrOH
i
that the HFIP-catalyzed strategy would bring great oppor-
tunities to efficiently access structurally diverse tetrasubstituted
difluoroalkyl allenes with difluoroenoxysilanes as difluoroalky-
c
13
<1 min
12
12
87
58
67
16
14
15
16
HFIP
HFIP
HFIP
1
0
lating reagents (Scheme 1c). Additionally, the coexistence of
allene and difluoroketone multifunctional structural units in
the products could provide versatile handles for the further
synthesis of structurally interesting fluorine-containing mole-
cules.
MeNO2
toluene
12
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (1.05 equiv), and catalyst
(10 mol %) in solvent (3.0 mL) at room temperature. Isolated yields.
b
c
d
HFIP was used as a solvent. ND, not detected.
With the above understanding in mind, we first examined
the reaction between propargylic alcohol 1a and difluoroenox-
ysilane 2a by employing different Lewis acids (Cu(OTf) , BF ·
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we
2
3
investigated the substrate scope of the preparation of
tetrasubstituted difluoroalkyl allenes 3. As shown in Scheme
2, a series of propargylic alcohols and difluoroenoxysilanes with
both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents
proved to be compatible for this HFIP-catalyzed reaction.
First, propargylic alcohols bearing different substituents at the
γ-position were evaluated. It was found that propargylic
alcohols bearing electron-donating groups afforded the desired
products (3c, 3d, and 3g) in a higher yield than the substrates
bearing electron-withdrawing groups (3b and 3f). A
substituent at the ortho position of the phenyl ring gave a
lower yield (3e, 72% yield), indicating that the steric effect had
a great influence on the reaction. Then, the propargylic
alcohols derived from a range of substituted diaryl ketones
were used as the substrate (1h−1p). All of these propargylic
alcohols were well tolerated under standard conditions and
afforded the expected products (3h−3p) in moderate to good
yields (64−87% yields). Subsequently, difluoroenoxysilanes
with electron-donating or electron-deficient groups were
evaluated, and the corresponding products could be obtained
in good yields (3q−3u). Heteroaryl-substituted propargylic
alcohol was also well-tolerated for this method to afford the
desired allene product (3v). Unfortunately, propargylic
alcohols derived from fluorenone 3w were found to be
unsuitable for this reaction, and the propargylic alcohol was
recovered, which was probably due to the large steric
hindrance of the fluorenyl group. For the alkyl-substituted
OEt ) or a Brønsted acid (diphenyl phosphate A) as a
2
comparison (Table 1, entries 1−3). Under the action of these
catalysts, the reaction usually gave both the allene product 3a
and the rearrangement product 4a simultaneously. Changing
the catalyst to more mild hydrogen-bonding organocatalysts
such as urea B and thiourea C did not give better results
(
entries 4 and 5). Considering the remarkable ability of HFIP
11,12
to enhance the reaction efficiency
and its good catalytic
performance for the construction of a fluorinated carbon−
8
carbon bond in our previous study, HFIP was then employed
as a promising catalyst to access the desired tetrasubstituted
difluoroalkyl allene products with high selectivity. As expected,
the reaction proceeded smoothly to afford the allene product
3
a in 86% yield (entry 6). Other fluoroalcohols, such as
trifluoroethanol (TFE), hexafluoro-2-methylisopropanol D,
hexafluoro-2-phenylisopropanol E, and 2,2,3,3-tetrafluorobuta-
nediol F, could also promote the selectivity toward the target
allene product, although in lower yields (entries 7−10).
Furthermore, the strong hydrogen-bonding donor ability and
the unique effects of fluorine atoms in HFIP were
demonstrated by the obtained results when HFIP was replaced
by the corresponding ether G or isopropanol (entries 11 and
1
2). Interestingly, the reaction could proceed almost
instantaneously when using HFIP as a solvent (entry 13).
Further screening of other solvents did not give higher yields
(
entries 14−16). Thus the optimal reaction conditions were
1
2
established to be the use of HFIP (10 mol %) as the catalyst in
dichloromethane (DCM) at room temperature, as shown in
entry 6.
propargyl alcohol 1x (R = R = Me), both the allene product
3x (42% yield) and the direct hydroxyl-substituted product 3x′
(34% yield) were obtained. Unfortunately, the benzyl-
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX