Analytical Chemistry
Article
Author Contributions
results from some standard peptides or peptides from blood
proteins,16a resorufin, and naphthol AS-MX,3 many peptides
and proteins from cells,16c or proteins secreted from cells into
the experimental media.16b Taken together, the results with
small molecules, isotopic labels, and many peptides all indicate
that LC−ESI-MS is apparently log linear for some pure
compounds and thus may approach linearity for some
molecules after preseparation by chromatography. Linear signal
intensities that are only a small fraction of the total ion current
are consistent with the competitive nature of the electrospray
ionization process19 in which the presence of other analytes
may affect observed intensities in unpredictable ways. The
potentially confounding effects of competition for ionization
were apparently not a factor in this case in which relatively pure
analyte PA dissolved in a 1 mM tris buffer is efficiently resolved
by high-pressure liquid chromatography prior to ionization with
results closely approaching log linearity.
A.F.-M. screened the substrates, optimized the detection
conditions, performed most experiments and numerical
analysis, created the charts and graphs, and proofed the
manuscript. J.G.M. performed preliminary experiments, con-
ceived and designed the ELIMSA experiment, wrote the
proposal, performed the statistical analysis, created the final
figures, and wrote the paper.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This work was supported by a Discovery Grant from the
Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
to J.G.M.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Engvall, E.; Perlman, P. Immunochemistry 1971, 8 (9), 871−874.
(b) Van Weemen, B. K.; Schuurs, A. H. FEBS Lett. 1971, 15 (3), 232−
236.
CONCLUSION
■
The use of LC−ESI-MS to measure an enzyme activity with a
conjugated molecular probe provides a universal system for the
quantification of macromolecules including proteins, ligands,
and/or receptors at femtogram to picogram amounts or less
with good signal-to-noise values. The detection of yoctomoles
of the AP-SA probe and measurement of zeptomoles of PSA is
comparable to, or more sensitive than, other methods claimed
to date2,14,15,20 but requires only commonly available micro
electrospray and a simple ion trap. ELIMSA with the substrate
PA5P that releases pyridoxamine showed more symmetrical
peaks, baseline to baseline separation even at close injection
intervals, and a much flatter baseline compared to the previous
substrate naphthol AS-MX phosphate and was a major
improvement to the method. The experiments here with
external and internal standards and isotope dilutions clearly
demonstrate that LC−ESI-MS may provide a linear relationship
between intensity and quantity after log transformation. All of
the PSA samples in this study were within the robust
quantification range of the ELIMSA in the zeptomole range
on column and could be estimated by interpolation between
known amounts of PSA standard solutions that were log linear
with a high signal-to-noise ratio. Here pyridoxamine, AP-SA,
and PSA molecules were absolutely quantified by LC−ESI-MS
against external standards and the linearity and accuracy of the
PA was supported by the use of internal isotopic standards. The
log linearity and normality of mass spectral intensity after log
transformation opens up broad vistas for the direct
quantification of many molecules by classical linear models
and ANOVA statistical analysis.3,16 The experiments here
unambiguously demonstrate that enzyme labeled probes can
sensitively quantify proteins or receptor−ligand complexes to
zeptomole amounts by direct mass spectrometric analysis and
will have a broad application and utility for measuring
molecules at low concentrations that greatly extends the
practical sensitivity of ELISA biomolecular analysis.
(2) Kulasingam, V.; Smith, C. R.; Batruch, I.; Buckler, A.; Jeffery, D.
A.; Diamandis, E. P. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7 (2), 640−647.
(3) Florentinus-Mefailoski, A.; Safi, F.; Marshall, J. G. J. Proteomics
2014, 96, 343−352.
(4) Simopoulos, T. T.; Jencks, W. P. Biochemistry 1994, 33 (34),
10375−10380.
(5) Staros, J. V. Biochemistry 1982, 21 (17), 3950−3955.
(6) Chaiet, L.; Wolf, F. J. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1964, 106, 1−5.
(7) Bothner, B.; Chavez, R.; Wei, J.; Strupp, C.; Phung, Q.;
Schneemann, A.; Siuzdak, G. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275 (18), 13455−
13459.
(8) Pris, A. D.; Mondello, F. J.; Wroczynski, R. J.; Murray, A. J.;
Boudries, H.; Surman, C. M.; Paxon, T. L. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81 (24),
9948−9954.
(9) Hempen, C.; van Leeuwen, S. M.; Luftmann, H.; Karst, U. Anal.
Bioanal. Chem. 2005, 382 (1), 234−238.
(10) Banks, J. F., Jr.; Shen, S.; Whitehouse, C. M.; Fenn, J. B. Anal.
Chem. 1994, 66 (3), 406−414.
(11) Orsin, F.; Shulman, S. J. Exp Med. 1971, 134 (1), 120−140.
(12) Black, M. H.; Grass, C. L.; Leinonen, J.; Stenman, U. H.;
Diamandis, E. P. Clin. Chem. 1999, 45 (3), 347−354.
(13) Marshall, J.; Schmit, J. C.; Betsou, F. Clin. Proteomics 2014, 11
(1), 3.
(14) Diamandis, E. P. Clin. Biochem. 1988, 21 (3), 139−50.
(15) Chikkaveeraiah, B. V.; Bhirde, A. A.; Morgan, N. Y.; Eden, H. S.;
Chen, X. ACS Nano 2012, 6 (8), 6546−6561.
(16) (a) Bowden, P.; Thavarajah, T.; Zhu, P.; McDonell, M.; Thiele,
H.; Marshall, J. G. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11 (4), 2032−2047.
(b) Florentinus, A. K.; Bowden, P.; Sardana, G.; Diamandis, E. P.;
Marshall, J. G. J. Proteomics 2012, 75 (4), 1303−1317. (c) Florentinus,
A. K.; Jankowski, A.; Petrenko, V.; Bowden, P.; Marshall, J. G. J.
Proteomics 2011, 75 (2), 450−468.
(17) Chelius, D.; Huhmer, A. F.; Shieh, C. H.; Lehmberg, E.; Traina,
J. A.; Slattery, T. K.; Pungor, E., Jr. J. Proteome Res. 2002, 1 (6), 501−
513.
(18) (a) Schwartz, J. C.; Senko, M. W.; Syka, J. E. J. Am. Soc. Mass
Spectrom. 2002, 13 (6), 659−669. (b) Stafford, G., Jr. J. Am. Soc. Mass
Spectrom. 2002, 13 (6), 589−596.
(19) Fenn, J. B.; Mann, M.; Meng, C. K.; Wong, S. F.; Whitehouse,
C. M. Science 1989, 246 (4926), 64−71.
(20) (a) Salehpour, M.; Possnert, G.; Bryhni, H. Anal. Chem. 2008,
80 (10), 3515−3521. (b) Liu, G.; Wang, J.; Kim, J.; Jan, M. R.; Collins,
G. E. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76 (23), 7126−7130. (c) Lohmann, W.;
Hayen, H.; Karst, U. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 9714−9719. (d) Munge,
B.; Liu, G.; Collins, G.; Wang, J. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77 (14), 4662−
4666. (e) Rozet, E.; Morello, R.; Lecomte, F.; Martin, G. B.; Chiap, P.;
Crommen, J.; Boos, K. S.; Hubert, P. J. Chromatogr., B: Anal. Technol.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
■
S
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
10690
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac502572a | Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 10684−10691