C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 3
Scheme 4
Scheme 5
Scheme 6
compound 14 also had NMR spectra that matched the synthetic
and natural product data exactly.10 However, preparation of both
(R)- and (S)-tetra-Mosher’s ester derivatives of 14 and comparison
with literature values confirmed that neither it nor its enantiomer
was the natural product. Conversely, the tetra-(R) and tetra-(S)
Mosher’s ester derivatives of 1 exhibited NMR data that matched
that reported in ref 4.
To conclude we have reported the first total synthesis of the
natural product cis-sylvaticin in a route that is exceptionally concise
(13 linear steps and 19 chemical operations in total). The key step
in our synthesis was a novel double oxidative cyclization of a tetraol
onto two pendant alkene units; this was promoted by catalytic
amounts of osmium and the reaction gave complete stereoselectivity
and stereospecificity for the double THF product.
Acknowledgment. We thank the EPSRC and AstraZeneca for
supporting this project. Merck, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Novartis
are thanked for unrestricted funding. N. Wagner is thanked for
assistance and J. L. McLaughlin is thanked for providing copies of
the NMR spectra of cis-sylvaticin.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
spectroscopic data for all new compounds. This material is available
References
(1) For a review see (a) Bermejo, A.; Figade´re, B.; Zafra-Polo, M.-C.;
Barrachina, I.; Estornell, E.; Cortes, D. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005, 22, 269.
For recent examples of syntheses see (b) Marshall, J. A.; Sabatini, J. J.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3557. (c) Narayan, R. S.; Borhan, B. J. Org Chem.
2006, 71, 1416. (d) Tominaga, H.; Maezaki, N.; Yanai, M.; Kojima, N.;
Urabe, D.; Ueki, R.; Tanaka, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 1422.
(2) (a) Marshall, J.; Jiang, H. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 7066. (b) Zhu, L.;
Mootoo, D. R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3154.
(3) (a) Makabe, H.; Tanaka, A.; Oritani, T. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 6329. (b)
Crimmins, M. T.; She, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12790. (c) Hoye,
T. R.; Eklov, B. M.; Jeon, J.; Khoroosi, M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3383.
(4) Shi, G.; Zeng, L.; Gu. Z.; MacDougal, J. M.; McLaughlin, J. L.
Heterocycles 1995, 41, 1785.
(5) (a) Donohoe T. J.; Butterworth, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2005,
44, 4766. A sacrificial alkene is added to these cyclizations to dihydroxy-
late Os(VIII) and form Os(VI), which is a more competent catalyst, in
situ. Cinnamic acid was used here because the diol formed from it is
polar and easy to separate. See also (b) Walba, D. M.; Stoudt, G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 727.
(6) The tetrol was analysed as its tetra Mosher’s ester and found to be >98%
ee; comparison with an authentic sample of a meso tetraol confirmed that
it was >95:5 dr in favour of the C2 symmetrical compound.
(7) Andersson, P. G.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7047.
We devised a computer programme which predicted that the maximum
yield attainable for double dihydroxylation of the two internal alkenes of
E,E-3 was 45%, which is close to our best yield of 37%. This model
assumes a 7:1 rate difference between the two classes of alkene and a
lack of cooperative effects upon rates after a single dihydroxylation.
(8) (a) Keum, G.; Hwang, C. H.; Kang, S. B.; Kim, Y.; Lee, E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 10396. (b) White, J. D.; Somers, T. C.; Reddy, G. N. J.
Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4991. (c) Schaus, S. E.; Brånalt, J.; Jacobsen, E.
N. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4876. (d) Avediaaian, H.; Sinha, S. C.; Yazbak,
A.; Sinha, A.; Neogi, P.; Sinha, S. C.; Keinan, E. J. Org. Chem. 2000,
65, 6035.
(9) Chatterjee. A. K.; Choi, T. L-.; Sanders, D. P.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11360.
(10) (a) Hoye, T. R.; Hanson, P. R.; Hasenwinkel, L. E.; Ramirez, E. A.;
Zhuang, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 8529. (b) Curran, D. P.; Zhang,
Q.; Lu, H.; Gudipati, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9943.
and selective deprotection 9, followed by oxidation and olefination
to furnish 10, Scheme 3.
The butenolide fragment of the target was prepared according
to the work of Lee, which transformed (R)-epichlorohydrin into
compound 11 in four steps, Scheme 4.8 After synthesizing 11, we
prepared 12 for cross-metathesis by introducing the butenolide
(thermal elimination) and deprotection of the OTBS group.
The union of the two halves was accomplished by a cross
metathesis reaction between 10 and 12, Scheme 5.9 Following the
work of Lee,8 we required a 4-fold excess of compound 12 to
eradicate homodimerization of bis-THF 10 (at the expense of
homodimerization of 12). Here, our rationale for early removal of
the TBS group from 11 becomes clear, because the homodimer of
12 is more polar than the desired compound 13 and thus easy to
separate. In addition, the dimerized derivative of 12 can be reused
in the cross-metathesis reaction to give 13 in 54% yield.
The synthesis was completed by a diimide reduction of the more
symmetrical alkene within 13 and acid promoted deprotection of
the three OTBS groups, to furnish cis-sylvaticin 1 in 69% yield
from 13. The synthetic material had spectroscopic data (1H and
13C NMR, [R]D, HRMS) identical to that reported.4
As part of final studies to confirm the structure of the natural
product and relate the stereochemistry of the bis-THF portion to
that of the butenolide, we prepared a series of diastereoisomers of
the structure 1, varying stereochemistry of the butenolide at both
C-4 and C-36, Scheme 6.10 Of the four possible stereoisomers,
JA0660148
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 42, 2006 13705