Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
from ADP and AMP under physiologically relevant conditions
renders it an attractive candidate for direct monitoring of
enzymatic reactions involving ATP hydrolysis such as those of
kinases and ATPases. We are currently investigating its
application in high-throughput screening and kinetic studies
of inhibition of kinases.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
S
Detailed experimental procedures, characterization of Tb-
DOTAm-Phen (1), and fluorescence spectra of Tb-DOTAm-
Phen·ATP titration. This material is available free of charge via
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Notes
Figure 3. Stern−Volmer plot of the time-delayed luminescence of Tb-
DOTAm-Phen (1) by the adenosine nucleotides ATP (filled circles),
ADP (open triangles), and AMP (gray diamonds). Experimental
conditions: excitation at 346 nm, emission integrated from 450 to 650
nm, time-delay = 0.1 ms, [Tb-DOTAm-Phen] = 10 μM, water, [Tris]
= 10 mM, pH 7.0, T = 20 °C, error bars represent SD, n = 3.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
This work was supported by Institutional Research Grant No.
118198-IRG-58-001-52-IRG80 from the American Cancer
Society and the University of Minnesota.
Table 1. Stern−Volmer Constants of Tb-DOTAm-Phen (1)
a
with Adenosine Nucleotides
REFERENCES
■
(1) Imming, P.; Sinning, C.; Meyer, A. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5,
821.
adenosine nucleotide
KSV
ATP
ADP
AMP
1.28 0.05
0.85 0.02
0.397 0.005
(2) Overington, J. P.; Al-Lazikani, B.; Hopkins, A. L. Nat. Rev. Drug
Discov. 2006, 5, 993.
(3) Garber, K. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 127.
(4) Comley, J. Drug Discov. World 2006, Winter 2006/7, 27.
(5) Kleman-Leyer, K. M.; Klink, T. A.; Kopp, A. L.; Westermeyer, T.
A.; Koeff, M. D.; Larson, B. R.; Worzella, T. J.; Pinchard, C. A.; van de
Kar, S. A. T.; Zaman, G. J. R.; Hornberg, J. J.; Lowery, R. G. Assay
Drug Dev. Technol. 2009, 7, 56.
a
Experimental conditions: excitation at 346 nm, emission integrated
from 450 to 650 nm, time-delay = 0.1 ms, [Tb-DOTAm-Phen] = 10
μM, water, [Tris] = 10 mM, pH 7.0, T = 20 °C, error represents SD, n
= 3.
(6) Warner, G.; Illy, C.; Pedro, L.; Roby, P.; Bosse, R. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2004, 11, 721.
quenches 59.7% of Tb-DOTAm-Phen’s time-gated lumines-
cence. At that same concentration, ADP quenches 47.4% of the
probe’s phosphorescence, whereas AMP quenches only 31.0%.
The Stern−Volmer relationship observed does not curve
upward as the concentration of nucleotide increases. This
indicates that quenching is either purely dynamic or purely
static in nature, but not both.27 Since quenching involves the
adenosine moiety (phosphates and sugars do not quench
terbium luminescence), a purely dynamic (collisional) mech-
anism would have resulted in identical Stern−Volmer constants
for each nucleotide. The significantly different Stern−Volmer
constants of the linear plots, however, strongly suggests
formation of 1:1 complexes between the probe and the
nucleotides, likely involving stacking of the purine base on the
aromatic antenna in a manner similar to that observed by
Lehn.17−20 Differentiation between the three nucleotides is
likely the result of electrostatic interactions between the
positively charged terbium probe and the negatively charged
nucleotides: the greater the negative charge of the nucleotide,
the higher its Stern−Volmer constant. A similar terbium probe
which is instead charged neutral is also efficiently quenched by
adenosine nucleotides, but it does not differentiate ATP from
ADP and AMP. Electrostatic interactions, albeit weak, have
already been used in molecular recognition in water.17−20,26
In conclusion, Tb-DOTAm-Phen (1) is an efficient
molecular probe for the time-gated molecular detection of
adenosine nucleotides. Its ability to readily distinguish ATP
(7) Koresawa, M.; Okabe, T. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 2004, 2, 153.
(8) Jin, G. X.; Aulabaugh, A.; Pocas, J.; Liu, H.; Kriz, R.; Sampath, D.
Anal. Biochem. 2006, 358, 59.
(9) Jia, Y.; Quinn, C. M.; Clabbers, A.; Talanian, R.; Xu, Y. J.;
Wishart, N.; Allen, H. Anal. Biochem. 2006, 350, 268.
(10) Degorce, F.; Card, A.; Soh, S.; Trinquet, E.; Knapik, G. P.; Xie,
B. Curr. Chem. Genomics 2009, 3, 22.
(11) Jia, Y.; Quinn, C. M.; Gagnon, A. I.; Talanian, R. Anal. Biochem.
2006, 356, 273.
(12) D’Souza, P. C. G.; Ally, N.; Agarwal, A.; Rani, P.; Das, M.;
Sarma, D. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2008, 40, 89.
(13) Carlson, C. B.; Robers, M. B.; Vogel, K. W.; Machleidt, T. J.
Biomol. Screen. 2009, 14, 121.
(14) Beis, I.; Newsholme, E. A. Biochem. J. 1975, 152, 23.
(15) New, E. J.; Parker, D.; Smith, D. G.; Walton, J. W. Curr. Opin.
Chem. Biol. 2010, 14, 238.
(16) Thibon, A.; Pierre, V. C. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2009, 394, 107.
(17) Hosseini, M. W.; Blacker, A. J.; Lehn, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1990, 112, 3896.
(18) Dhaenens, M.; Lehn, J.-M.; Vigneron, J.-P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1993, 1379.
(19) Cudic, P.; Zinic, M.; Tomisic, V.; Simeon, V.; Vigneron, J.-P.;
Lehn, J.-M. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 1073.
(20) Baudoin, O.; Gonnet, F.; Teulade-Fichou, M.-P.; Vigneron, J.-P.;
Tabet, J.-C.; Lehn, J.-M. Chem.−Eur. J. 1999, 5, 2762.
(21) Bobba, G.; Dickins, R. S.; Kean, S. D.; Mathieu, C. E.; Parker,
D.; Peacock, R. D.; Siligardi, G.; Smith, M. J.; Gareth Williams, J. A.;
Geraldes, C. F. G. C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 1729.
16101
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja304373u | J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 16099−16102