TABLE 1. Metal Cocatalyst Effect on the [4+2] Cycloaddition
Reaction
TABLE 2. The Effect of Sc(OTf)3 Cocatalyst
no metal
10 mol % Sc(OTf)3
entry
MLn
% ee
% yielda
% ee % yielda
% yielda,b
entry
R1
% ee
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sc(OTf)3
Zn(OTf)2
In(OTf)3
AI(OTf)3
Cu(OTf)2
no metal
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
81
73
68
57
34
69c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
4a Me
4b Me
4c Et
4d i-Pr
4e Ph
4f Bn
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
>99
91
92
86
84
92
81
87
90
d
d
71
62
c
59
c,e
e
66
63
83
86
b
63
c
e
e
a
4g p-MeO-Ph
4h CH2Phthalimide >99
Reactions run with the quinone imide (0.12 mmol), dihydrocinnamoyl
chloride (0.12 mmol), H u¨ nig’s base (0.12 mmol), BQd (0.012 mmol), and
metal triflate (0.012 mmol), followed by addition of MeOH; percent yield
a
Reactions run with quinone imide (0.12 mmol), acid chloride (0.12
mmol), H u¨ nig’s base (0.12 mmol), and BQd (3a, 0.012 mmol), followed
by addition of MeOH; percent yield is for both steps. Reactions employed
cocatalyst Sc(OTf)3 (0.012 mmol). Previously reported yield, ref 5.
b
is for both steps. Previously reported yield, ref 5.
b
c
For guidance, we drew on our previous experience with
bifunctional catalytic systems, which focused on the cooperative
action of Lewis acids and cinchona alkaloid based nucleophilic
catalysts. One study screened Lewis acids for their ability to
activate imino esters toward nucleophilic attack by cinchona
alkaloid derived zwitterionic ketene enolates.2b This work
identified several Lewis acids that worked well in tandem with
our chiral nucleophilic catalyst, narrowing a range of metal co-
catalysts to complexes of Al(III), Zn(II), Sc(III), and In(III). In
another study, these same metals were found to activate o-benzo-
quinone diimides and improve their reaction with chiral ketene
d
Reactions employed BQ (3b, 0.012 mmol) instead of BQd and yielded
the opposite enantiomer. e Reactions required slow addition of a solution
of acid chloride over 6 h.
cycloaddition reaction (Table 2). The yields of the scandium
cocatalyzed reactions are universally high. Generally, the
addition of Sc(OTf)3 increased the reaction yields by an average
of 28%, and up to a 42% increase (Table 2, entry 4). Only two
reactions displayed less than a 29% increase: the reactions
involving p-methoxyphenylacetyl chloride and 3-phthalimi-
dopropionyl chloride each benefited from a scandium cocatalyst
by a modest 5% increase in yield. However, these were by far
the highest yielding no-metal reactions (Table 2, entries 7 and
).
Each reaction shown in Table 2 (entries 1 and 3-8) gave
the (R)-enantiomer in virtually enantiomerically pure form. The
S)-enantiomer can be obtained in similarly high enantioselec-
4
enolates. Though each reaction set prefers a different metal
complex, both reports demonstrated that the Lewis acid acts
through coordination with the respective electrophilic substrate.
On the basis of previous success, we tested the ability of these
metals to enhance the reaction between o-benzoquinone imides
and ketene enolates. We examined the effect of a metal
cocatalyst on the overall yield of a standard reaction. Several
metal triflates were screened in the reaction of the dichloroben-
zoquinone imide (1) and dihydrocinnamoyl chloride (Table 1).
Cocatalyst Sc(OTf)3 provided a nearly 30% increase in yield
relative to no metal. The strong Lewis acid activity of Sc(OTf)3
is expected because of its hard character and electron-delocal-
izing triflate group. Scandium has found considerable use in
catalysis of Diels-Alder-type reactions, and is particularly
known for catalyzing hetero-Diels-Alder cycloadditions. The
scandium complex promoted a faster, cleaner reaction than the
other metals tested, thereby making it the best overall Lewis
acid for this cycloaddition reaction.
Zinc(II) triflate was the second most efficient metal cocatalyst,
effecting a 16% increase in yield, and indium promoted a more
modest increase. It is not surprising that copper(II) triflate was
detrimental to the reaction; copper is known to have an affinity
for amines, and it is possible that this is an example of the self-
quenching catalytic system discussed previously. Most impor-
tantly, there was no erosion of ee when any of these metal
complexes were used as cocatalysts.
8
8
(
tivity and yield for every cycloaddition reaction when catalyst
pseudoenantiomer BQ (3b) is utilized (Table 2, entry 2). This
sense of induction is consistent with other asymmetric reactions
that have employed these cinchona alkaloids to catalytically
9
derive chiral ketene enolates. Importantly, the addition of the
scandium cocatalyst did not degrade or change the enantiose-
lectivity. In fact, in every chiral reaction assayed, the other
enantiomer was not detected by chiral phase HPLC. The
bifunctional catalytic system, employing scandium as a cocata-
lyst, provided faster, cleaner reactionssthey were generally
complete in less than half the time required for their no-metal
counterparts. By coordinating with the quinone imide function-
ality, scandium renders it more electrophilic and more suscep-
tible to nucleophilic attack by the catalytically derived chiral
ketene enolate; thus, scandium creates the bifunctional catalytic
system proposed in Scheme 3.
6
7
In conclusion, we have demonstrated an asymmetric, bifunc-
tional catalytic method that vastly improves the yield and
accessibility of non-natural R-amino acid precursors, 1,4-
Having established that the Sc(OTf)3 cocatalyst was the best
overall Lewis acid, we decided to screen several acid chloride
substrates to study the scope of scandium’s influence on the
(
8) Absolute configurations were determined previously by correlation
to several known R-amino acid derivatives; see ref 5.
9) (a) Bekele, T.; Shah, M. H.; Wolfer, J.; Abraham, C. J.; Weatherwax,
(
A.; Lectka, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (6), 1810-1811. (b) France,
S.; Weatherwax, A.; Taggi, A. E.; Lectka, T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37
(8), 592-600. (c) France, S.; Weatherwax, A.; Lectka, T. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 475-479. (d) Taggi, A. E.; Hafez, A. M.; Wack, H.; Young, B.;
Ferraris, D.; Lectka, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124 (23), 6626-6635.
(
6) Silvero, G.; Ar e´ valo, M. J.; Bravo, J. L.; AÄ valos, M.; Jim e´ nez, J. L.;
L o´ pez, I. Tetrahedron 2005, 61 (30), 7105-7111.
7) Kobayashi, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 15-27.
(
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 72, No. 14, 2007 5381