Angewandte Chemie International Edition
10.1002/anie.201808085
COMMUNICATION
very high in energy (see Fig. 4). Thus in the absence of any low
established for oxido-metal complexes,[17] may also provide a
framework for understanding the reactivity of superoxido-metal
species.
lying excited states, the reactivity of 2 likely occurs solely at the
2
2
ground 2als state. Furthermore, the oxygen atoms in the 2als
2
state carry higher negative charge than in the 1als state, as
evident from the Natural Population Analysis (Fig. S13). This
explains the higher nucleophilicity of 2 relative to 1 in presence of
added electrophiles.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (UniCat;
EXC 314-2 and Heisenberg Professorship to KR) and
European Research Council (ERC CoG No. 682275) for
financial support. CP and TC gratefully acknowledge the
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation for postdoctoral
fellowships. XAS experiments were performed at SSRL
beamline 4-1 (SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory,
USA) benefited from support of the US DOE Office of
Science (DE ‐ AC02 ‐ 76SF00515) and the US NIH
(
P30‐EB‐009998 and P41‐GM‐103393). TC also
thanks the COST Action CM1305 (ECOSTBio) for a STSM
grant (COST-STSM-CM1305-39979).
Keywords: β-diketiminate • biuret • oxido-metal species
•nucleophilic oxidation • two state reactivity
[
[
1] a) K. Ray, F. F. Pfaff, B. Wang, W. Nam, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136,
3942-13958; b) W. Nam, Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 465-465 (and
1
references therein).
-
1
Figure 4. Relative energies (kJ mol ) of the DFT-derived ground- and excited-
states of 1 and 2, respectively, along with the optimized geometries and spin-
2] a) S. Yao, M. Driess, Acc. Chem. Res. 2012, 45, 276-287; b) A. Bakac,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 2046-2058; c) M. Costas, M. P. Mehn, M.
P. Jensen, L. Que, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 939-986; d) C.-W. Chiang, S. T.
Kleespies, H. D. Stout, K. K. Meier, P.-Y. Li, E. L. Bominaar, L. Que, E.
Münck, W.-Z. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 10846-10849; e) J.
Shearer, R. C. Scarrow, J. A. Kovacs, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
density (positive: black, negative: grey) plots of 21als ( 1ahs) and 2als ( 2ahs
2
2
2
)
states (see also Fig. S12).
11709-11717; f) S. Hong, K. D. Sutherlin, J. Park, E. Kwon, M. A. Siegler,
E. I. Solomon, W. Nam, Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5440; g) J. Cho, J. Woo,
W. Nam, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5958-5959; h) J. Cho, J. Woo, W.
Nam, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11112-11115; i) T. Devi, Y.-M. Lee, W.
Nam, S. Fukuzumi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 8372-8375; j) T. Devi,
Y.-M. Lee, J. Jung, M. Sankaralingam, W. Nam, S. Fukuzumi, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3510-3515.
In conclusion, the contrasting reactivity of putative
superoxido-nickel(II) intermediates in bio-relevant oxidation
reactions is strongly dependent on subtle electronic changes as
shown for 1 and 2. The unexpected nucleophilicity of the
II
superoxido-Ni core in 2 suggests that such a reactivity may also
[3] S. Kundu, E. Matito, S. Walleck, F. F. Pfaff, F. Heims, B. Rábay, J. M. Luis,
A. Company, B. Braun, T. Glaser, K. Ray, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 2787-
play a role in catalytic cycles of Ni-containing oxygenases and
oxidases. Furthermore, the contrasting reactivity of 1 and 2 can
be explained by results of DFT calculations. Notably, an identical
GS has been predicted for both 1 and 2 in spite of their different
charges; this is also reflected in the experimentally determined
comparable O-O vibrational energies, Ni-N/O bond distances,
EPR g-tensors, and Ni K-edge/pre-edge energies for 1 and 2.
However, the nature of the ES differs in the two cases. The
observed electrophilic reactivity of 1 is most probably due to the
2791.
[
4] a) J. P. Klinman, J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 3013-3016; b) S. C. Peck, W.
A. van der Donk, Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2013, 17, 580-588; c) L. M. Mirica,
J. P. Klinman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 1814-1819.
5] J. M. Bollinger, J. C. Price, L. M. Hoffart, E. W. Barr, C. Krebs, Eur. J. Inorg.
Chem. 2005, 2005, 4245-4254.
6] P. Pirovano, A. M. Magherusan, C. McGlynn, A. Ure, A. Lynes, A. R.
McDonald, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5946-5950.
7] J.-H. Jeoung, D. Nianios, S. Fetzner, H. Dobbek, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2016, 55, 3281-3284.
8] a) J. Cho, R. Sarangi, J. Annaraj, S. Y. Kim, M. Kubo, T. Ogura, E. I.
Solomon, W. Nam, Nat. Chem. 2009, 1, 568; b) M. T. Kieber-Emmons, J.
Annaraj, M. S. Seo, K. M. Van Heuvelen, T. Tosha, T. Kitagawa, T. C.
Brunold, W. Nam, C. G. Riordan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14230-
[
[
[
[
2
2
availability of two closely lying spin states, 1als GS and 1ahs ES,
2
wherein the spin-polarized 1ahs state has a much lower reaction
14231; c) S. Yao, E. Bill, C. Milsmann, K. Wieghardt, M. Driess, Angew.
barrier than the 21als state. In contrast, the 22ahs state is
energetically not accessible for 2, which shuts down the
electrophilic reactivity pathway. Strong-electron donation by the
dianionic biuret ligand L then results in a single-state nucleophilic
Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7110-7113; d) J. Cho, H. Y. Kang, L. V. Liu, R.
Sarangi, E. I. Solomon, W. Nam, Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 1502-1508.
[
9] A. Company, S. Yao, K. Ray, M. Driess, Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 9669-
9675.
[10] X. Engelmann, I. Monte-Pérez, K. Ray, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55,
2
II
7632-7649.
d
reactivity on the 2als surface. The higher availability of the T Ni -
[
11] B. Ramdhanie, J. Telser, A. Caneschi, L. N. Zakharov, A. L. Rheingold, D.
P. Goldberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2515-2525.
[12] M. T. Kieber-Emmons, C. G. Riordan, Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 618-625.
hs state in 1 compared to 2 is plausibly reflected in the
appearance of more intense broad absorptions in the 800-1100
nm region in the electronic spectra of 1 (Fig. S14). These bands
are presumably originating from the ligand-field (LF) transitions
[
13] a) J. Roithová, A. Gray, E. Andris, J. Jašík, D. Gerlich, Acc. Chem. Res.
016, 49, 223-230; b) J. Jašík, J. Žabka, J. Roithová, D. Gerlich, Int. J.
2
Mass Spectrom. 2013, 354-355, 204-210; c) J. Jašík, D. Gerlich, J.
Roithová, J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 2532-2542.
8
II
arising from a d -Ni center, which is expected to be spin and
symmetry allowed (and hence more intense) in a Td geometry
and forbidden (with zero-intensity) in a pure SqP geometry.[ To
conclude, this study provides evidence that the TSR theory, well
[
14] G. J. Colpas, M. J. Maroney, C. Bagyinka, M. Kumar, W. S. Willis, S. L.
Suib, P. K. Mascharak, N. Baidya, Inorg. Chem. 1991, 30, 920-928.
16]
[15] A. Ansari, P. Jayapal, G. Rajaraman, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 564-
68.
16] C. A. L. Filgueiras, F. Carazza, J. Chem. Educ. 1980, 57, 826-827.
5
[
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.