Syntheses, Modeling, and Biology of the Anguinomycins
A R T I C L E S
involves binding to the chromosome maintenance region 1
(CRM1) exportin through its R,ꢀ-unsaturated lactone moiety.9
This leads to selective inhibition of the protein/protein interac-
tion in the ternary CRM1-RAN-cargo protein complex10 and
thereby to efficient shutdown of CRM1-mediated nuclear protein
export. High specificity and efficiency made LMB a frequently
used tool compound in cell biology with over 1000 publications
reporting its use.11 This selective action also prompted the
synthetic community, and many total syntheses of LMB and
other members of this family have been reported.12 Although
initial studies on LMB were abandoned due to toxicity,7 renewed
clinical interest in LMB focused on its use in combination
therapy (e.g., with gleevec)13 and on the generation of less toxic
analogues with increased therapeutic windows by chemical
modification14 or conjugation to antibodies.15
Anguinomycins A-D were reported as selective agents
targeting immortalized cells,16 as they have been shown to
induce apoptosis in pRB-inactivated tumor cells, while only
inducing growth arrest in normal cells. This astonishing
selectivity caused us to prepare totally synthetic anguinomycin
C, and we were able to show that anguinomycin C is an inhibitor
of CRM1-mediated nuclear export.17 However, major questions
concerning the mode of action of these compounds remain open.
In particular, the role of the polyketide chain is unclear, as, for
example, Kudo et al. suggested either mimicry of the protein
cargo or induction of a conformational change of CRM1 by
LMB.9a,b We wanted to investigate if this chain mimics the
hydrophobic leucine-rich nuclear export signal of the cargo
protein. It has been shown that interactions between this leucine-
rich helical sequence and CRM1 are relatively weak, relying
on Coulomb protein/protein interactions of a single helical
fragment.11 Therefore, we hypothesized that the side chain of
LMB/anguinomycins can be either replaced by a simpler
hydrophobic analogue or completely omitted.
In this study, we investigate these hypotheses by a combina-
tion of synthetic chemistry, biological evaluation, and compu-
tational modeling. We report in full detail the total synthesis
and biological evaluation of anguinomycins C (1) and D (2) as
well as a series of analogues designed to probe these questions
(Figure 1). We show that replacement of the side chain by a
linear terpene is possible without strongly impacting biological
activity (compound 3), and we observed that analogue 4 with a
truncated polyketide chain (Figure 1) almost fully retains
biological activity. The structural basis for the biological activity
of these natural products on CRM1 binding could be rationalized
by atomistic modeling of LMB, anguinomycin, and general
lactones of type 5 to CRM1.
(6) Kobayashi, M.; Higuchi, K.; Murakami, N.; Tajima, H.; Aoki, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2859–2862.
(7) Newlands, E. S.; Rustin, G. J. S.; Brampton, M. H. Br. J. Cancer
1996, 74, 648–649.
(8) (a) Fornerod, M.; Ohno, M.; Yoshida, M.; Mattaj, I. W. Cell 1997,
90, 1051–1060. (b) Fukuda, M.; Asano, S.; Nakamura, T.; Adachi,
M.; Yoshida, M.; Yanagida, M.; Nishida, E. Nature 1997, 390, 308–
311. (c) Wolff, B.; Sanglier, J. J.; Wang, Y. Chem. Biol. 1997, 4,
139–147. (d) Nishi, K.; Yoshida, M.; Fujiwara, D.; Nishikawa, M.;
Horinouchi, S.; Beppu, T. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 6320–6324.
(9) (a) Kudo, N.; Wolff, B.; Sekimoto, T.; Schreiner, E. P.; Yoneda, Y.;
Yanagida, M.; Horinouchi, S.; Yoshida, M. Exp. Cell Res. 1998, 242,
540–547. (b) Kudo, N.; Matsumori, N.; Taoka, H.; Fujiwara, D.;
Schreiner, E. P.; Wolff, B.; Yoshida, M.; Horinouchi, S. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 9112–9117. (c) Daelemans, D.; Afonina,
E.; Nilsson, J.; Werner, G.; Kjems, J.; De Clercq, E.; Pavlakis, G. N.;
Vandamme, A. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 14440–
14445. (d) Van Neck, T.; Pannecouque, C.; Vanstreels, E.; Stevens,
M.; Dehaen, W.; Daelemans, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 9487–
9497.
(10) (a) Dong, X.; Biswas, A.; Suel, K. E.; Jackson, L. K.; Martinez, R.;
Gu, H.; Chook, Y. M. Nature 2009, 458, 1136–1141. (b) Dong, X.;
Biswas, A.; Chook, Y. M. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 558–560.
(c) Monecke, T.; Guttler, T.; Neumann, P.; Dickmanns, A.; Gorlich,
D.; Ficner, R. Science 2009, 324, 1087–1091.
(11) Review: Kutay, U.; Gu¨ttinger, S. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15, 121–
124.
Results
(12) For callystatin, see: (a) Murakami, N.; Wang, W.; Aoki, M.; Tsutsui,
Y.; Sugimoto, M.; Kobayashi, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2349–
2352. (b) Crimmins, M. T.; King, B. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 9084–9085. (c) Smith, A. B., III; Brandt, B. M. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 1685–1688. (d) Kalesse, M.; Quitschalle, M.; Khandavalli, C. P.;
Saeed, A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3107–3109. (e) Marshall, J. A.; Bourbeau,
M. P. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 2751–2754. (f) Vicario, J. L.; Job, A.;
Wolberg, M.; Mu¨ller, M.; Enders, D. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1023–1026.
(g) Lautens, M.; Stammers, T. A. Synthesis 2002, 1993–2012. (h)
Langille, N. F.; Panek, J. S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3203–3206. (i) Dias,
L. C.; Meira, P. R. R. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 4762–4773. (j) Reichard,
H. A.; Rieger, J. C.; Micalizio, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008,
47, 7837–7840. (k) For leptomycin B, see: Kobayashi, M.; Wang,
W.; Tsutsui, Y.; Sugimoto, M.; Murakami, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998,
39, 8291–8294. (l) For ratjadone, see: Christmann, M.; Bhatt, U.;
Quitschalle, M.; Claus, E.; Kalesse, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000,
39, 4364–4366. (m) Williams, D. R.; Ihle, D. C.; Plummer, S. V. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 1383–1386. (n) For leptofuranin D, see: Marshall, J. A.;
Schaaf, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7428–7432. (o) For (-)-
kazusamycin, see: Arai, N.; Chikaraishi, N.; Omura, S.; Kuwajima, I.
Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2845–2848. (p) For leptostatin, see: Marshall, J. A.;
Mikowski, A. M.; Bourbeau, M. P.; Schaaf, G. M.; Valeriote, F.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 320–323.
Total Syntheses of Anguinomycins C and D. The synthesis
of anguinomycins C (1) and D (2) started with the preparation
of dihydropyran 9 via a hetero Diels-Alder reaction between
known aldehyde 618 and commercially available 1-methoxy-
1,3-butadiene (7) (Scheme 1). The reaction was catalyzed by
the Cr(III) catalyst (8) developed by Jacobsen and co-workers19
and was carried out under solvent-free conditions and in the
presence of 4 Å molecular sieves.20 The dihydropyran 9 was
obtained in high yield (86%), enantioselectivity (96% ee), and
as a 5:1 diastereomeric mixture due to epimerization at the
anomeric center under the reaction conditions. Attempts to
directly use the MeO-protected lactol 9 for the continuation of
the synthesis proved to be problematic. The diastereoisomers
could be easily separated by chromatography, but after depro-
tection of the silyl group with TBAF, the resulting terminal
alkyne 10 was volatile and difficult to handle. Therefore, we
(13) (a) Kancha, R. K.; Von Bubnoff, N.; Miething, C.; Peschel, C.; Go¨tze,
K. S.; Duyster, J. Haematologica 2008, 93, 1718–1722. (b) Aloisi,
A.; Di Gregorio, S.; Stagno, F.; Guglielmo, P.; Mannino, F.; Sormani,
M. P.; Bruzzi, P.; Gambacorti-Passerini, C.; Saglio, G.; Venuta, S.;
Giustolisi, R.; Messina, A.; Vigneri, P. Blood 2006, 107, 1591–1598.
(14) (a) Santi, D. V.; Zhou, Y. WO Patent 2005086944, 2005. (b) Santi,
D. V.; Myles, D. C.; Dong, S.; Brian, H. U.S. Patent 2005272727,
2005. (c) Dong, S.; Santi, D. V. WO Patent 2007033214, 2007. (d)
Dong, S.; Myles, D. C.; Santi, D. V.; Brian, H. CN Patent 1964718,
2008. (e) Mutka, S. C.; Yang, W. Q.; Dong, S. D.; Ward, S. L.; Craig,
D. A.; Timmermans, P. B. M. W. M.; Murli, S. Cancer Res. 2009,
69, 510–517.
(15) Bouchard, H.; Commercon, A.; Chari, R. V. J. E. WO Patent
2007144709, 2007.
(16) (a) Hayakawa, Y.; Sohda, K. Y.; Shin-Ya, K.; Hidaka, T.; Seto, H. J.
Antibiot. 1995, 48, 954–961. (b) Hayakawa, Y.; Adachi, K.; Ko-
meshima, N. J. Antibiot. 1987, 40, 1349–1352.
(17) Bonazzi, S.; Gu¨ttinger, S.; Zemp, I.; Kutay, U.; Gademann, K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8707–8710.
(18) Plater, M. J.; Aiken, S.; Bourhill, G. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 2415–
2422.
(19) Chavez, D. E.; Jacobsen, E. N. Org. Synth. 2005, 82, 34–42.
(20) Jarvo, E. R.; Lawrence, B. M.; Jacobsen, E. N. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 6043–6046.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 4, 2010 1433